On September 7th, 2022, Indiana University unveiled a bronze sculpture memorializing Alfred Kinsey, a biologist, and sexologist whose works sparked a profound shift in American culture. Sitting on the Bloomington campus, the sculpture marks the 75th anniversary of The Kinsey Institute which is touted as “the world’s leading sexual research institute”.

During the dedication ceremony, Indiana University President Pamela Whitten stated:

“Around the nation and around the world, the Kinsey Institute is the trusted source for information on critical issues in human sexuality, relationships, gender and reproduction. And its reputation for excellent, relevant scholarship bolsters Indiana University’s reputation.”

Justin Garcia, executive director of the Kinsey Institute said:

“Dr. Kinsey left us with the extraordinary legacy of his endless scientific curiosity, his unwavering commitments to academic freedom and his passion for understanding humanity’s sexual diversity.”

Right.

That’s a weird way of describing a man whose “research” included counting the number of orgasms a 4-year-old boy could have in 24 hours. Apparently, the answer is 26. In case you wondered, this “data” was obtained by a pedophile who systematically abused over 300 children and communicated his findings to Kinsey.

Of course, none of these facts were mentioned when Kinsey’s sculpture was unveiled. In fact, mass media has been whitewashing Kinsey’s past and highly questionable methods for decades.

In an age where figures of the past are scrutinized and “canceled” for all kinds of reasons, Kinsey gets a statue. Why is that?

The short answer: Kinsey was part of an elite-backed agenda that is still highly relevant today. Everything that is happening today regarding sex, genders, and the normalization of everything abnormal (including pedophilia) can be traced back to Kinsey’s seminal works. Here’s a look at this highly influential figure.

Funded by the Elite

During the 1940s, Kinsey obtained research funding from the Rockefeller Foundation. This fact alone is enough to understand the forces behind Kinsey’s work.

A quick refresher course about the Rockefellers: They’re nothing less than America’s royal family. John D. Rockefeller is still considered the wealthiest American of all time and the richest person in modern history.

In the past decades, this powerful elite dynasty used its enormous resources to create the Rockefeller Foundation which shaped American society in ways we cannot even fathom. The foundation created entire fields of study and threw billions of dollars at research that aligned with its agenda.

What agenda am I referring to? In his own memoirs, David D. Rockefeller wrote:

“Some believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
-David Rockefeller, “Memoirs of David Rockefeller”

While it might not be obvious at first, Kinsey’s works on sexuality play an important role in the globalist agenda. Last year, I published an article titled The 1963 List “Current Communist Goals” is Becoming a Reality Right Before Our Eyes which lists the numerous ways America can be weakened from within. The ultimate goal: To integrate it into a global world order. Here are three of these objectives:

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

Alfred Kinsey played a major role in making these objectives a reality.

Redefining Sexuality

In 1948, Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and, a few years later, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. The books quickly became best-sellers and made Kinsey a celebrity. More importantly, they sparked a great shift in American morals and values.

During the 1950s, Kinsey teamed up with Mary Calderone (medical director for Planned Parenthood) to create the sex education curriculum that is still taught in schools today.

Hugh Hefner, the founder of Playboy magazine considered himself “Kinsey’s pamphleteer”. In the inaugural issue of his magazine, Hefner wrote:

“If you are a man between 18 and 80, Playboy is for you… we believe… we are filling a publishing need only slightly less important than the one taken care of by the Kinsey report.”

Needless to say, Kinsey’s work was highly controversial.

“While a set of people hailed the American biologist for revolutionising sexual customs, breaking taboos about the discussion of sex and challenging centuries of beliefs about human appetites and capacities, another set of people considered Kinsey as a paedophile, adulterer, attention-seeker, pornographic “filmmaker” and an addict, whose sole objective in carrying out research on sexology was to normalise and legitimise his many illegal fetishes.”
– Jinit Jain, Death anniversary of Alfred Kinsey: ‘Father of sexual revolution’

John Bancroft, a former director of Kinsey’s Institute stated that he “rebelled against what he regarded as the destructively repressive sexual mores of his time.” Kinsey believed that there were only three kinds of sexual abnormalities: abstinence, celibacy, and delayed marriage.

Indeed, Kinsey wrote:

“All orgasms are “outlets” and equal between husband and wife, boy and dog, man and boy, girl, or baby. For there is no abnormality and no normality.”

By including “boy and dog” in the quote above, Kinsey included bestiality in what is “normal”. And, according to his “data”, 50% of men  (mainly farm boys) had engaged in sex with an animal. Kinsey wrote:

“There are histories of farm-bred males who have risen to positions of importance in the business, academic, or political world in some large urban centre, and who have lived for years in constant fear that their early histories will be discovered. The clinician who can reassure these individuals that such activities are biologically and psychologically part of the normal mammalian picture, and that such contacts occur in as high percentage of the farm population as we have already indicated, may contribute materially toward the resolution of these conflicts.”

Yes, Kinsey wrote that bestiality is “part of the normal mammalian picture”.

But it gets much worse. Kinsey went out of his way to portray children as “sexual beings”. Bancroft stated that Kinsey was “particularly interested in the observation of adults who had been sexually involved with children”. That’s an understatement.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Kinsey stated that his findings were “an important substantiation of the Freudian view of sexuality as a component that is present in the human animal from earliest infancy.”

To support his claims, Kinsey obtained “data” that was compiled in the infamous Table 34, which is one of the worst things that ever happened in the history of science.

Found in the book Sexual Behavior of the Human Male, Table 34 documents the “sexual responses” of children from infants through teens as recorded by their adult male abusers. These pedophiles conducted sexual experiments on hundreds of children by bringing them to what the experimenters called “orgasm” (screaming, weeping, fighting the sexual “partner”) and timing these responses with a stopwatch.

The book states:

“We have now reported observation on such specifically sexual activities as erection, pelvic thrusts, and several other characteristics of true orgasm in a list of 317 pre-adolescent boys ranging between infants of five months and adolescence in age.”

Table 34 records nothing less than the systematic abuse of over 300 children aged between 5 months to 14 years old. The data it contains is simply horrifying. How can an 11-month-old baby have 14 orgasms in 38 minutes unless it was the result of outright torture?

When asked how he obtained this “data”, Kinsey blatantly lied and claimed that it came from various sources. But that wasn’t true. All of this “data” was obtained by one (insane) pedophile.

“His most infamous research subject was the 1944 interview of a sexual omnivore, who had a history of having sexual encounters with men, women, boys, girls, animals and family members, and which took about 17 hours to be recorded.”
– Op. Cit. Jain

In 1995, John Bancroft, director of the Kinsey Institute stated:

“The material in the tables came from one man, an extraordinary man with incredible numbers of sexual experiences on which he kept very careful notes.”
– Washington Post, Kinsey Report, Fast And Loose?

You’ve read correctly. The director of the Kinsey Institute called the monster who abused over 300 children “an extraordinary man”.

Just think about it for a second. How can one “extraordinary” man have access to over 300 children (some literal babies) to experiment on? In what conditions did he make a 4-year-old child have 26 orgasms in 24 hours? Were these children kidnaped and forced into MKULTRA-style sexual experiments?

Pat Trueman, a former US Attorney for the US Justice Department’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Unit stated:

“If these experiments took place, they involved acts to which no child could provide consent and for which no parent or guardian could provide consent on behalf of the child. Therefore we are talking about criminal behavior, the criminal sexual abuse of children.”

Throughout the years, the Kinsey Institute refused to reveal this “extraordinary” pedophile’s name. He’s cataloged at the Institute under a pseudonym and all investigations were cut short.

In short, Kinsey used this “data” to normalize child sexuality. But that’s not all. In Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, he even attempted to normalize incest by claiming that “children are sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth (womb to tomb), unharmed by incest, adult/child sex, and often benefit thereby.”

Yes, he said that children that are raped by their own family can “benefit” from it.

To prove his claims, Kinsey and his associates interviewed 4,441 female children who were abused. The conclusion: Only one of them experienced harm.

“There are, of course, instances of adults who have done physical damage to children with whom they have attempted sexual contacts, and we have the histories of a few males who had been responsible for such damage. But these cases are in the minority, and the public should learn to distinguish such serious contacts from other adult contacts which are not likely to do the child any appreciable harm if the child’s parents do not become disturbed…among the 4,441 females on whom we have data, we have only one clear-cut case of serious injury done to the child, and a very few instances of vaginal bleeding which, however, did not appear to do any appreciable damage.”

The least one can say is that Kinsey’s conclusions are questionable. That’s because his entire methods are questionable.

Flawed and Fraudulent Methods

In the years that followed the publication of his books, some facts emerged regarding Kinsey’s methods that completely discredited his findings. First, it was discovered that, among the 17,000 people that were interviewed for his research, prostitutes and prison inmates (mainly sex offenders) were grossly overrepresented.

It was also discovered that Kinsey interviewed a disproportionate number of homosexual men which completely distorted his studies. For instance, his book claimed that “37% of males and 13% of females had at least some overt homosexual experience to orgasm”. These numbers did not represent American society at all.

Kinsey claimed that humans are naturally bisexual but are forced into heterosexuality and monogamy due to social and religious pressures. Considering the fact that Kinsey was bisexual himself (and involved in an open marriage) one question begs to be asked: Did Kinsey distort facts to fit personal biases and a wider agenda?

One thing is for sure: His methods were completely unscientific.

“But was he a scientist – or a voyeur and latent paedophile? He observed and filmed men and women having sex in various combinations. He had sex with some of his subjects and with his researchers and so, too, did his wife, Mac. He exchanged lewd, locker-room limericks with his students and got his young researchers to discuss their wives’ masturbatory habits. Once, when he had set up a sado-masochistic session involving two men, the researchers had to step aside occasionally when Mac came in to change the blood-stained sheets. He interviewed young children about their ideas on sex and incorporated the research of a self-confessed paedophile into his own work.”
– Irish Times, Everything you ever wanted to know about Kinsey

As stated above, Kinsey’s “research” included filming his coworkers having sex in his attic. Why is this person still considered credible in any shape or form?

In Conclusion

Alfred Kinsey’s research was deeply flawed. It was motivated by an obvious agenda and tainted with his own perversions. As if that wasn’t enough, his books contained the “findings” of an anonymous pedophile who sexually tortured hundreds of children. These facts should be enough to completely discredit this man and throw all of his “research” in the garbage.

But that is not what is happening. His story was whitewashed in the 2004 Hollywood movie Kinsey. In 2019, Kinsey was one of the inaugural fifty American “pioneers, trailblazers, and heroes” inducted on the National LGBTQ Wall of Honor. And, in 2022, Indiana University unveiled a statue of him to honor his memory.

The only reason why Kinsey is celebrated (and not canceled) is because his works are aligned with the elite’s agenda. And that is why a pedophilia apologist was honored with a statue.

Warning: This article contains elements that might be disturbing to some readers.

Elizabeth Bathory was a Hungarian noblewoman born in the 16th century. She was beautiful, highly educated and she spoke several languages. She lived in lavish castles. Her family lineage was illustrious and owned land in the Kingdom of Hungary. She was the niece of Stephen Bathory, the king of Poland, the grand duke of Lithuania, and the prince of Transylvania. She did good deeds for local peasants who admired her. In short, she had everything going for her.

Then, rumors began circulating that she was a vampiric witch who abducted girls and tortured them in her castle. Later, these rumors were proven true … and then some. In fact, Bathory’s cruelty and depravity were so shocking that they inspired legends that we still hear about today.

Known as the “Blood Countess” or “Countess Dracula”, Bathory holds the Guinness record for “most prolific female murderer in the Western world”. She is alleged to have killed over 600 virgins in order to drink their blood and bathe in it, ostensibly to preserve her youth.

A deeper look at Elizabeth Bathory’s life provides a rare glimpse into the true mindset of the occult elite – one that remained the same to this day. While these grim yet revealing stories are usually erased from history or dismissed as “hoaxes” by the powers that be, substantial documentation about Bathory’s life, crimes, and trial remained intact. Despite this fact, we’ve seen efforts to whitewash Bathory’s story, dismiss many of her actions as exaggerations and even portray her as some sort of “strong independent woman”.

While she was most likely strong and independent, she was a mass murderer of young women. Bathory was also obsessed with satanism, witchcraft, and draining blood from common people.

She did not come up with any of this herself, those practices were rampant amongst nobles and aristocrats of the day. Nothing has changed. Here’s a look at Bathory’s life.

Elite Family

Bathory was born in Transylvania in 1560. She was the product of inbreeding between Baron George Bathory and Baroness Anna Bathory. Her family included kings, cardinals, knights, and judges. It also included cruel, violent, and deranged psychopaths.

During her childhood, Bathory witnessed numerous acts of cruelty committed by her family.

“At her family’s estate in Ecsel, she was rumored to have witnessed her family’s officers dole out every form of cruelty in the name of justice. At the age of ten, Elizabeth watched them sew a gypsy, accused of larceny, into the belly of a dying horse; his head was exposed, and he was left to die. She was also said to be epileptic, and that, possibly from inbreeding, rendered her prone to fits of rage”.
– The Toast, “Yes, We Can Now Talk About Elizabeth Báthory”

From a young age, Bathory was surrounded by people with dark interests.

“Bathory’s aunt Klara, a distinguished lady at the court, was reputed to be a lesbian and witch. An uncle was an alchemist and devil-worshiper, and her brother was a reprobate around whom no woman or female child was considered safe. To make matters worse, her nurse from childhood, Ilona Jooone was steeped in the practice of black magic that reportedly required the sacrifice of children for their bones and blood.”
– Ibid.

At the age of 15, Bathory was married to Count Ferenc Nadasdy who became a powerful general. The arranged marriage turned out to be a good match as both of them had heavy sadistic tendencies.

“During the summer, they doused servants in honey and watched as bees swarmed. Torture supposedly became a common interest for the couple, and they sought out instruction from occultists and Satanists.”
– Ibid.

Not unlike today’s elite, Elizabeth knew how to hide her family’s dark side with good deeds.

“As well as being capable of managing and defending their vast territories, Elizabeth was very generous to the poor and needy. She gave lots of money to charity and often intervened on behalf of impoverished or disadvantaged women and children…in order to keep the family reputation up and to hide their satanic traditions. However, even though she acted nice, her true colors showed when she was alone.”
– Ibid.

To please Elizabeth, her husband reportedly built a torture chamber to her exact specifications. And, while he was away waging war against the Turks, Elizabeth kept busy with dark activities.

“Aunt Klara began popping over to school her niece in her preferred methods of entertainment: flagellation, lesbian orgies, and various forms of sadomasochism. Klara was abetted by a loyal retainer named Thorko who introduced the beautiful Erzsébet (Elizabeth) to the occult, piquing her interest in mixology. Erzsébet grew adept of concocting sundry drugs, brews, and potions; and in her husband’s absence her various houseguests included self-proclaimed sorcerers and seers, warlocks, witches, and alchemists.”
– Leslie Carol, Royal Pains

Monster

As years went by, Elizabeth’s taste for blood became monstrous. Peasant girls from nearby towns regularly went missing, never to be seen again. Some were handed over by trusting parents who were eager to gain favor with the countess.

Once in Bathory’s castle, the girls were locked up and subjected to the worse torture imaginable.

“Everyone in Hungary, regardless of rank or proximity, lived in terror of the powerful Bàthorys. Still only an adolescent herself when she began torturing peasant girls, Erzésbet took advantage of a serving wench’s merest misstep, using it as an excuse to punish her. She often devised tasks that were nearly impossible to accomplish, just so she could torture someone. But rebukes and slaps were for sissies. If a girl was suspected of theft, she was commanded to strip naked and was then tortured by the application of red-hot coins pressed against her bare skin. Sometimes the countess opted to go organic; The girls were whipped with stinging nettles after being beat with some other device. And even if a servant girl hadn’t misbehaved she might still end up as the day’s entertainment. Mutilation was frequently on the menu. Girls were placed into cages fitted with internal spikes that impaled them everywhere as the cage tightened, resulting in agonizing and bloody death. Pincers and tongs, heated until they glowed, were used to tear off bits of flesh. Scalding irons branded their tender skin. Erzsébet even perfected a technique of tearing a girl’s head apart by tugging the sides of her mouth until they ripped and her neck snapped in two.

The countess was said to have achieved sexual exstasy during these torture session, squealing in girlish delight at the sights and sounds of her victim’s agony. She enjoyed whipping them from the front, just so she could see the pain and terror on their faces. Sometimes, for kicks and giggles Erzsébet would slather a girl with honey and tie her to a tree, leaving her to the mercy of insects and other wildlife with a sweet tooth.”
– Ibid.

When her husband died, Elisabeth took things to another level.

“Although the count participated in his wife’s cruelties, he may have also restrained her impulses; when he died in the early 1600s, she became much worse. With the help of her former nurse, Ilona Joo, and local witch Dorotta Szentes, Bathory began abducting peasant girls to torture and kill. She often bit chunks of flesh from her victims, and one unfortunate girl was even forced to cook and eat her own flesh. Bathory reportedly believed that human blood would keep her looking young and healthy.”
– History, Hungarian countesses’ torturous escapades are exposed

From a young age, Bathory was obsessed with her looks. She reportedly spent hours staring at the mirror while mumbling strange incantations. After her husband’s death, Bathory became a single mother of eight in her forties. And she was willing to do anything to preserve her youthful looks. Anything.

“Erzsébet now convinced herself that torture and mutilation had an additional, and healthful, benefit. One day, a hapless servant accidentally pulled the countess’s hair while she was drawing a section of her tresses through a mesh hairnet studded with pearls. The girl received such a resounding slap that her nose bled, splashing on Erzsébet’s hand (or face, depending on the source of the anecdote). After regarding herself in a mirror, Erzsébet was convinced that her skin looked much more youthful where the virgin girl’s blood had spattered her.

A self-proclaimed local sorceress who called herself Darvulia (real name Anna), and was known as “the witch of the forest,” had by then become one of Erzsébet’s cohorts. Darvulia suggested to the countess that bathing in the blood of virgins would be as beneficial as a fountain of youth. So Erzsébet lured as many peasant girls as she could to Castle Csejthe, as well as to her other properties, including a town house in Vienna, to ensure that her new beauty regimen, as well as her preferred form of entertainment, remained uninterrupted. According to historian Margaret Nicholas, Darvulia and her confederate procuresses (aging widows who were well paid for their services) roamed the region after dark in search of fresh victims.

At the castles the girls were systematically slaughtered, their blood collected in vars and buckets for the courtesan’s ritual bath, taken at the mystical hour of four a.m. If a victim was particularly beautiful, Ezsébet was reputed to have imbibed her blood.”
– Op cit., Carol

Downfall

Although rumors about the horrors happening at the castle were rampant, the peasantry remained silent. However, when Elizabeth began recruiting girls from minor noble families, her downfall began.

“Elizabeth became brazen and careless towards the end of her killing career. While staying in Vienna, she ordered a renowned choir singer from the Church of Holy Mary, Ilona Harczy, to perform privately for her at her apartments in the city on Augustinian Street. The girl was never seen again and witnesses claimed Elizabeth killed her when she could not sing for her either out of fright or shyness.”
– Peter Vronsky, The True Story of Elizabeth Báthory “The Blood Countess”

After lots of political negotiations involving the entire Hungarian elite, the King of Hungary finally ordered Bathory’s arrest. Her castle was raided during the Christmas holidays of 1610. Accounts of the raid are nothing less than horrifying.

“When they reached the castle on a blustery, winter night, they found the front door slightly ajar. They were greeted not by a servant, but by a corpse splayed on the cold, stone floor. Pale from bloodletting and partially clothed from torture, the young woman in the entryway was just the first body they found in the Castle Cachtice; others were half-dead, awaiting their fate in the dungeon. Elizabeth, along with her accomplices and servants, were allegedly found upstairs, in the throes of holiday orgy. She watched as all around her were arrested, but she was spared such an indignity.
– Op. Cit. The Toast

During Bathory’s trial, testimonies from witnesses, accomplices, and survivors horrified the judges.

“Testimony revealed that the kidnapped girls had been chained to walls in the dungeons and fattened up, because the Countess believed this increased the blood in their bodies was critical to her moonlit sorcery. They were also forced into deviant sexual activities with her. If they reacted with displeasure, they received torture and possibly death. Yet, even those who did well eventually bored her and they, too, were dispatched. Sometimes, depending on the countesss whim, her favorite girls got the worst treatment. One had been forced to strip a piece of flesh off her own arm. A few were shoved into small cages full of spikes.”
– Op. Cit., Vronsky

Inside her castle, authorities found a ledger containing the names of over 600 victims. As the search went on, bodies were discovered everywhere on the premises, from shallow graves to hidden chambers inside the castle.

Despite the overwhelming proof against Bathory, she was relatively spared. While her accomplices were tortured and promptly executed by the authorities, Bathory did not attend the trial and was not executed.

“Pressure was on to keep her fortune in the family, so in the end Erzsbet Bthory was imprisoned for life, with no formal sentencing, locked in a small set of rooms in her own castle at Cahtice. She was confined to her rooms, with the entrances and windows walled up, save for tiny slits for food and air.”
– Ibid.

After four years of confinement in her castle, died at the age of 54.

In Conclusion

The story of Elizabeth Bathory was nearly erased from history. It easily could have morphed into a fictionalized legend, like many other stories involving the occult elite. Her trial was held in secret in a remote Slovakian town in 1611 and her powerful family immediately sealed its records. There were no newspapers to report on it. None of the ruling families wanted grim details against their relatives released to public scrutiny. Elizabeth was not even allowed to appear at the trial. Instead of public execution, she was walled in alive inside one of her remote castles.

In many ways, Bathory’s life and downfall are highly reminiscent of a modern equivalent: Jeffrey Epstein. Like Epstein, Bathory had connections with some of the world’s most powerful people. And, like Epstein, Bathory lured young girls with promises of wealth and prestige. However, like Epstein, Bathory became too brazen and her depravity fueled rumors across the land. Her incessant kidnappings became a source of concern for the elite as its dark secrets were threatened to be revealed. So, like Epstein, Bathory was incarcerated until death, with no opportunity for her to say another word to anyone else. Finally, like Epstein, all of her accomplices were silenced in one way or another.

About 500 years after Bathory’s death, today’s occult elite remains obsessed with the same horrific practices. Numerous articles on The Vigilant Citizen have documented the elite’s taste for the depraved, the abhorrent, and the outright evil. Today’s mass media is filled with abuse, satanism, cannibalism, blood rituals, and every debased practice one can think of. This is all by design.

The elite’s insanity used to be hidden. Now it is being normalized.