On September 7th, 2022, Indiana University unveiled a bronze sculpture memorializing Alfred Kinsey, a biologist, and sexologist whose works sparked a profound shift in American culture. Sitting on the Bloomington campus, the sculpture marks the 75th anniversary of The Kinsey Institute which is touted as “the world’s leading sexual research institute”.

During the dedication ceremony, Indiana University President Pamela Whitten stated:

“Around the nation and around the world, the Kinsey Institute is the trusted source for information on critical issues in human sexuality, relationships, gender and reproduction. And its reputation for excellent, relevant scholarship bolsters Indiana University’s reputation.”

Justin Garcia, executive director of the Kinsey Institute said:

“Dr. Kinsey left us with the extraordinary legacy of his endless scientific curiosity, his unwavering commitments to academic freedom and his passion for understanding humanity’s sexual diversity.”

Right.

That’s a weird way of describing a man whose “research” included counting the number of orgasms a 4-year-old boy could have in 24 hours. Apparently, the answer is 26. In case you wondered, this “data” was obtained by a pedophile who systematically abused over 300 children and communicated his findings to Kinsey.

Of course, none of these facts were mentioned when Kinsey’s sculpture was unveiled. In fact, mass media has been whitewashing Kinsey’s past and highly questionable methods for decades.

Kinsey on the cover of Time magazine, 1953.

In an age where figures of the past are scrutinized and “canceled” for all kinds of reasons, Kinsey gets a statue. Why is that?

The short answer: Kinsey was part of an elite-backed agenda that is still highly relevant today. Everything that is happening today regarding sex, genders, and the normalization of everything abnormal (including pedophilia) can be traced back to Kinsey’s seminal works. Here’s a look at this highly influential figure.

Funded by the Elite

During the 1940s, Kinsey obtained research funding from the Rockefeller Foundation. This fact alone is enough to understand the forces behind Kinsey’s work.

A quick refresher course about the Rockefellers: They’re nothing less than America’s royal family. John D. Rockefeller is still considered the wealthiest American of all time and the richest person in modern history.

In the past decades, this powerful elite dynasty used its enormous resources to create the Rockefeller Foundation which shaped American society in ways we cannot even fathom. The foundation created entire fields of study and threw billions of dollars at research that aligned with its agenda.

What agenda am I referring to? In his own memoirs, David D. Rockefeller wrote:

“Some believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
-David Rockefeller, “Memoirs of David Rockefeller”

While it might not be obvious at first, Kinsey’s works on sexuality play an important role in the globalist agenda. Last year, I published an article titled The 1963 List “Current Communist Goals” is Becoming a Reality Right Before Our Eyes which lists the numerous ways America can be weakened from within. The ultimate goal: To integrate it into a global world order. Here are three of these objectives:

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

Alfred Kinsey played a major role in making these objectives a reality.

Redefining Sexuality

Kinsey’s two books revolutionized how sexuality is taught and perceived in America and the world.

In 1948, Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and, a few years later, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. The books quickly became best-sellers and made Kinsey a celebrity. More importantly, they sparked a great shift in American morals and values.

During the 1950s, Kinsey teamed up with Mary Calderone (medical director for Planned Parenthood) to create the sex education curriculum that is still taught in schools today.

Hugh Hefner, the founder of Playboy magazine considered himself “Kinsey’s pamphleteer”. In the inaugural issue of his magazine, Hefner wrote:

“If you are a man between 18 and 80, Playboy is for you… we believe… we are filling a publishing need only slightly less important than the one taken care of by the Kinsey report.”

Needless to say, Kinsey’s work was highly controversial.

“While a set of people hailed the American biologist for revolutionising sexual customs, breaking taboos about the discussion of sex and challenging centuries of beliefs about human appetites and capacities, another set of people considered Kinsey as a paedophile, adulterer, attention-seeker, pornographic “filmmaker” and an addict, whose sole objective in carrying out research on sexology was to normalise and legitimise his many illegal fetishes.”
– Jinit Jain, Death anniversary of Alfred Kinsey: ‘Father of sexual revolution’

John Bancroft, a former director of Kinsey’s Institute stated that he “rebelled against what he regarded as the destructively repressive sexual mores of his time.” Kinsey believed that there were only three kinds of sexual abnormalities: abstinence, celibacy, and delayed marriage.

Indeed, Kinsey wrote:

“All orgasms are “outlets” and equal between husband and wife, boy and dog, man and boy, girl, or baby. For there is no abnormality and no normality.”

By including “boy and dog” in the quote above, Kinsey included bestiality in what is “normal”. And, according to his “data”, 50% of men  (mainly farm boys) had engaged in sex with an animal. Kinsey wrote:

“There are histories of farm-bred males who have risen to positions of importance in the business, academic, or political world in some large urban centre, and who have lived for years in constant fear that their early histories will be discovered. The clinician who can reassure these individuals that such activities are biologically and psychologically part of the normal mammalian picture, and that such contacts occur in as high percentage of the farm population as we have already indicated, may contribute materially toward the resolution of these conflicts.”

Yes, Kinsey wrote that bestiality is “part of the normal mammalian picture”.

But it gets much worse. Kinsey went out of his way to portray children as “sexual beings”. Bancroft stated that Kinsey was “particularly interested in the observation of adults who had been sexually involved with children”. That’s an understatement.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Kinsey stated that his findings were “an important substantiation of the Freudian view of sexuality as a component that is present in the human animal from earliest infancy.”

To support his claims, Kinsey obtained “data” that was compiled in the infamous Table 34, which is one of the worst things that ever happened in the history of science.

Found in the book Sexual Behavior of the Human Male, Table 34 documents the “sexual responses” of children from infants through teens as recorded by their adult male abusers. These pedophiles conducted sexual experiments on hundreds of children by bringing them to what the experimenters called “orgasm” (screaming, weeping, fighting the sexual “partner”) and timing these responses with a stopwatch.

Table 34.

The book states:

“We have now reported observation on such specifically sexual activities as erection, pelvic thrusts, and several other characteristics of true orgasm in a list of 317 pre-adolescent boys ranging between infants of five months and adolescence in age.”

Table 34 records nothing less than the systematic abuse of over 300 children aged between 5 months to 14 years old. The data it contains is simply horrifying. How can an 11-month-old baby have 14 orgasms in 38 minutes unless it was the result of outright torture?

When asked how he obtained this “data”, Kinsey blatantly lied and claimed that it came from various sources. But that wasn’t true. All of this “data” was obtained by one (insane) pedophile.

“His most infamous research subject was the 1944 interview of a sexual omnivore, who had a history of having sexual encounters with men, women, boys, girls, animals and family members, and which took about 17 hours to be recorded.”
– Op. Cit. Jain

In 1995, John Bancroft, director of the Kinsey Institute stated:

“The material in the tables came from one man, an extraordinary man with incredible numbers of sexual experiences on which he kept very careful notes.”
– Washington Post, Kinsey Report, Fast And Loose?

You’ve read correctly. The director of the Kinsey Institute called the monster who abused over 300 children “an extraordinary man”.

Just think about it for a second. How can one “extraordinary” man have access to over 300 children (some literal babies) to experiment on? In what conditions did he make a 4-year-old child have 26 orgasms in 24 hours? Were these children kidnaped and forced into MKULTRA-style sexual experiments?

Pat Trueman, a former US Attorney for the US Justice Department’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Unit stated:

“If these experiments took place, they involved acts to which no child could provide consent and for which no parent or guardian could provide consent on behalf of the child. Therefore we are talking about criminal behavior, the criminal sexual abuse of children.”

Throughout the years, the Kinsey Institute refused to reveal this “extraordinary” pedophile’s name. He’s cataloged at the Institute under a pseudonym and all investigations were cut short.

In short, Kinsey used this “data” to normalize child sexuality. But that’s not all. In Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, he even attempted to normalize incest by claiming that “children are sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth (womb to tomb), unharmed by incest, adult/child sex, and often benefit thereby.”

Yes, he said that children that are raped by their own family can “benefit” from it.

To prove his claims, Kinsey and his associates interviewed 4,441 female children who were abused. The conclusion: Only one of them experienced harm.

“There are, of course, instances of adults who have done physical damage to children with whom they have attempted sexual contacts, and we have the histories of a few males who had been responsible for such damage. But these cases are in the minority, and the public should learn to distinguish such serious contacts from other adult contacts which are not likely to do the child any appreciable harm if the child’s parents do not become disturbed…among the 4,441 females on whom we have data, we have only one clear-cut case of serious injury done to the child, and a very few instances of vaginal bleeding which, however, did not appear to do any appreciable damage.”

The least one can say is that Kinsey’s conclusions are questionable. That’s because his entire methods are questionable.

Flawed and Fraudulent Methods

In the years that followed the publication of his books, some facts emerged regarding Kinsey’s methods that completely discredited his findings. First, it was discovered that, among the 17,000 people that were interviewed for his research, prostitutes and prison inmates (mainly sex offenders) were grossly overrepresented.

It was also discovered that Kinsey interviewed a disproportionate number of homosexual men which completely distorted his studies. For instance, his book claimed that “37% of males and 13% of females had at least some overt homosexual experience to orgasm”. These numbers did not represent American society at all.

Kinsey claimed that humans are naturally bisexual but are forced into heterosexuality and monogamy due to social and religious pressures. Considering the fact that Kinsey was bisexual himself (and involved in an open marriage) one question begs to be asked: Did Kinsey distort facts to fit personal biases and a wider agenda?

One thing is for sure: His methods were completely unscientific.

“But was he a scientist – or a voyeur and latent paedophile? He observed and filmed men and women having sex in various combinations. He had sex with some of his subjects and with his researchers and so, too, did his wife, Mac. He exchanged lewd, locker-room limericks with his students and got his young researchers to discuss their wives’ masturbatory habits. Once, when he had set up a sado-masochistic session involving two men, the researchers had to step aside occasionally when Mac came in to change the blood-stained sheets. He interviewed young children about their ideas on sex and incorporated the research of a self-confessed paedophile into his own work.”
– Irish Times, Everything you ever wanted to know about Kinsey

As stated above, Kinsey’s “research” included filming his coworkers having sex in his attic. Why is this person still considered credible in any shape or form?

In Conclusion

Alfred Kinsey’s research was deeply flawed. It was motivated by an obvious agenda and tainted with his own perversions. As if that wasn’t enough, his books contained the “findings” of an anonymous pedophile who sexually tortured hundreds of children. These facts should be enough to completely discredit this man and throw all of his “research” in the garbage.

But that is not what is happening. His story was whitewashed in the 2004 Hollywood movie Kinsey. In 2019, Kinsey was one of the inaugural fifty American “pioneers, trailblazers, and heroes” inducted on the National LGBTQ Wall of Honor. And, in 2022, Indiana University unveiled a statue of him to honor his memory.

The only reason why Kinsey is celebrated (and not canceled) is because his works are aligned with the elite’s agenda. And that is why a pedophilia apologist was honored with a statue.