Connect with us


Latest News

New Film Shows Diana “Very Much Alive” After Car Crash

Published

on

New Film Shows Diana “Very Much Alive” After Car Crash

One of the first articles I’ve published on Vigilant Citizen was “Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning” which describes the  events and the symbolism relating to the ritual sacrifice of Lady Di. While most people still buy the official “accident” story, evidence mounts that an accident was not the cause of Diana’s death, but was actually a set up leading to her murder.

A new film entitled Unlawful Killing (to be released everywhere except the UK) will apparently be showing a pictures of Diana right after the accident…still alive and not dying. Furthermore, the movie will show Diana predicting the circumstances of her death.The movie is backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, the father of Diana’s fiancé who also died that night.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

Unlawful Killing will probably not dwell on the occult and ritualistic side of things. It remains, after all, a mass media production. When cover-ups are too sloppy and evidence begin piling disproving them, limited concessions are made to quell the public’s questions. This movie might be a limited concession, where part of the big ugly truth is revealed in order to protect the “bigger uglier truth”. We’ll see.

From the London Telegraph:

The film sets out to prove a cover-up by the “establishment” over the death of Princess Diana. It has caused outrage in sections of the British press and is not scheduled for a UK release.

Directed by actor Keith Allen and backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, father of Dodi, the film is being screened at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival on Friday.

Mr Allen describes his film as an “inquest into the inquest” of Princess Diana’s death. Of the controversial photo, Mr Allen wrote in the Daily Mail: “The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock.

“It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.”

Director Keith Allan about his documentary in The Guardian

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won’t get to see
My documentary about the Diana inquest will be shown everywhere but the UK. Here’s why

The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My “inquest of the inquest” film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I’d half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn’t hold an inquest into his son’s death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run “Was Diana Murdered?” pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer’s note that the Windsors were planning an “accident” to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who’d sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are “a safe pair of hands”. Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state’s interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed “biologically inexplicable” by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana’s seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of “unlawful killing” by unidentified “following vehicles”; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury’s troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we’re showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Loading...

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Get an e-mail notification as soon as a new article is published on The Vigilant Citizen.
169 Comments

169
Leave a Comment

10000
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
janie's gunn

I was 16 when Diana died. I distinctly remembered watching the breaking events on ABC.. I also remember ABC reporting that Diana had suffered a leg injury and was being rushed into surgery…moments later she was pronounced dead. I always wondered how did she pass from a leg injury. Now that I am older..things make more sense. This woman was murdered..

Anila

I obviously think that Diana was rather murdered in this fatal car accident. I felt bad for her since

she was being put through this pressure of having had to be like one of the Royals. She was a beautiful and honest woman, she was herself and she went against everything that the Royals established. After doing tons of research on her, I learned that she was brought up just to marry Prince Charles.On August 31st 2005, which was the eighth anniversary of Diana’s death, the major questions still have not been answered, in fact the public now believe overwhelmingly that the biggest conspiracy theory, is the establishment view she was not murdered at all.

DJ

I will be watching. I have always believed she was murdered too. Diana was a threat to the Royal Family because she was her own woman and went against everything the establishment represented. Didn't this "accident" happen shortly after she divorced Charles?

Tee

I remember this! The media reported the crash and I remember thinking how convenient because she had been extremely vocal about her unhappiness with the royal family and I believe she had won custody of her kids plus a settlement from Charles. Anyway, none of the news outlets reported any kind of fatal injuy. In fact they said the opposite, they said she was just being taken to hospital with minor injuries, some said she might need surgery. I went to bed. By the next morning she was dead! WTF?? I knew then she was murdered! Her death did not jibe with the reports from the night before and I thought once again. How convenient! Bastards, I loved Princess Di!

Edge Of Glory

I bet Charles set it up. He's been a self-serving liar since day one. He had his own wife bumped off just so he could parade around with that Horse faced floozy for the benefit of the paps.

Hot to Trot

'Horse faced floozy' I love that line, I'm gonna have to use that one some time.

Me!

diana was an obvious sacrifice and it's sad what happened but she's not been the only one!

what about what is happening right now in israel…this could eventually be big…I've experienced personally the hate arabs around the world have for israel and this could turn epic quickly!! PEOPLE PRAY FOR ISRAEL!

Chipper

Candy is right on this one, and history supports the claims made. There is a great reason why things have happened and somethings are of long term planning and design. Israel was created to be a secular state to cause divide between the major monotheistic religions. WW3 is being primed right now and all the media hype is a lot of yellow journalism and dark propaganda to promote fear, anger, and hatred among the religions pitted against each other. At the same time, this gives greater credance to the atheist's position that "religion is the root of all evil', that monotheism is a psychiatric disorder "The God Delusion", and to expose the hypocrisy of blind religious followers who drop the Love of neighbor and instead become the wicked mob under a rallying cry of anger, fear and under the false pretense of God. Israel is a secular state. Zionism and Judaism are entirely two different things, but if you ever watch the news they are always linked. In the USA mainstream if one speaks anything negative towards Israel (Zionism), they are immediately labled 'antisemitic' (if non-jewish) or 'self hating jew' (if jewish). Once that person is labled- they are discredited… Read more »

candy

Well said, I couldn't agree more, they plan on deviding us to conquer by using fear, suffering and more importently hat…after creating racism, they created neoracism : hate based on culturel origins and religious beliefs which can be spred easly and quickly via mass medias to communicate and hype the population on delusional fears as well as dumping it down…

We can only delay the unavoidable at best, at least that is what we think but it was written for us long before we existed to experience things we can't stop nor prevant from appening such as NWO. Beside, Everything has an end same goes for their plans. After all, those idiots will experience some joy down here creating the chaos they are doing however, what awaits them after life isn't pretty the least…

candy

You have to understand that the hate is born from israel gouvernement, they kill and destroy lives of million palestiniens for the sake of what ? Claiming they deserve the land in the name of the Tora ? Is this really a good justification ?

Palestine has always been a country or should I say an ex- province of the Ottoman empire, once the Empire collapsed after World War1, all the provinces were promised to be independent and internationaly known as Country. However, that didn't happen, some countries regain their freedoms after many years, while other didn't.

Did you know, jews, christians and muslims were all living peacefully in Palestine before Occidental jews were put there by UNO ? Israel could have been created anywhere around the world even in Canada, yet they decided to create the land of Israel in Palestine for many reasons such as : controlling the oil coming from Middle-East countries to restrain the economical power and political influance of China and India.

And many more reasons…but yeah, hate won't get us no where, saddly we can't change people minds

Amontyy

I would have to disagree.. minds are the ONLY thing we can change and the only thing that by changing, will make a difference.

V

I had the displeasure of bumping into the picture of di after the crash. It's seriously traumatic. Her face completely disfigured and i mean completely. I don't even want to describe. If you plan on watching this movie be prepared – the picture will never leave your mind. Now everytime I think if diana I see that picture.

not that I don't buy that it was an accident but it's hard for me to believe someone remained alive after that crash. she practically smashed her entire face in. It's just not possible to sray ali.ve after that

Please be adviced, these pictures are awful.

Livi

I honestly believe Princess Diana was murdered. Lets look at the evidence shall we? The note, the explosion heard at the site, the cameras that were mysteriously off or not working, the mysterious white Fiat that was at the scene, according to eyewitness accounts that has mysteriously disappeared. The fact that it took a little over an hour to get to the hospital when it should have taken MUCH LESS than that. Coincidence? I THINK NOT! The paparazzi were not even there at the crash site. They chased Diana's car, then the car got away from them, then the paparazzi showed up after the "accident." I wonder if Prince William and Prince Harry know the truth or if they believe whatever lies Charles and the Queen have told them. RIP Diana.

CHRIS

DO NOT WORRY MY FRIEND UNLAWFUL KILLING WILL BE SHOW TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC I WILL AS MANY OTHERS HAVE POST IT ON MY YOUTUBE AND FACEBOOK VIDEOS AND PUT LINKS TO IT EVERYWHERE I CAN, BTW IT IS A BRILLIANT DOCUMENTARY SO ANYONE THAT READS THIS WATCH IT SHOULD BE AIRED ON MAINSTREAM TV BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT WILL EVER HAPPEN, WAS DIANA MURDERED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT, DAM RIGHT SHE WAS THE COVER UP, AND SUBSEQUENT INQUEST WAS A CIRCUS AFFAIR, SHAME ON BRITISH JUSTICE

heath

i remember it very well , it was early in the morning and i was talking to my girlfriend on the phone when it popped up on the news , i saw her alive and smoking a cigerete with a small ambulance lady , they where walking in and out the back of the ambulance and checking on dodi in the back of the car , the news said dodi was dead and diana had a bad cut on her thigh , but i saw her walking about ? did anybody else see this ? i know my girlfiend did . i new it wasnt an accident at the time

the watchful

wow i wonder if the same will happen to kate middleton,

and what a coincidence that dodi and is father died on the same night??i never knew that..

Jack

Whether or not she died in that car accident I truly believe the queen (I refuse to capitalize the q) had something to do with her death, and people go around bowing and worhiping her, it's disgusting to watch.

Allan

I've known people at crash sites who were alert and talking after the crash, but then died. In those cases, it was internal bleeding.

lee mack

the minute she died i knew she had been murdered. a beautiful girl, naive and lost in an old established FIRM….from the start she was made to feel insignificant, she became/was a loose cannon as she hurtled through fog…..i dont believe she was murdered by royalty but by fanatical loyalists…(Echo's and reminiscent of : 'WHO WILL RID ME OF THIS TURBULANT PEST") reverberate in my ears

Darling Di rest in peace ….THEY didnt want a muslim so close to the british throne and future king!e

severalminds

learnsomething23 thank you for consideration. I do agree with your comments answering to the people who try to help the conflict between the one-god religions. Actually this is a part of illuminati plans – ro devide and empire, create conflicts between the one god religions in order to make confusion and feed the hate – the best food of evil… as i said before it is not about islam or christianism apart, but THEY are against all the motheistic religions…there is no problem for christians in islamic countries, furthermore, the christians are respected a lto by muslim people as those 2 religions have the same doctrine and origin. i see that the last years there a re a lot of new steretypes created on purpose by the evils servants which try to make appear the one God believers as stupid, ignorant, barbaric or dangerous. In movies, music videos, books and etc. they try to idolise the vampirism, darkness, magics and other bullshit of this category and by other side they attack badly the one God believers, religious, good, honest people. It is started almost by a long time, see the movie "grease" for example…the message of this movie is: if… Read more »

Voice of Reason

I agree…and what's up with all of the 'May 21st is Doomsday' crap? Who's funding all of that? I'm not sure how many people are part of that group, but their new vans look very expensive, and their extensive billboard/ad campaign can't have been cheap. Yet, from what I've read, most of these people didn't sell their homes and belongings to finance this…they just walked away from their stuff.

This makes me wonder if the whole mess was financed by the Illuminati, in yet another attempt to discredit Christianity; by portraying Christians as delusional, egotistical weirdos.

Bella

There's no question she was murdered. Royalty, hollywood, the social elite are just one dark sinister group. Unless they repent, they will have to answer to Jesus for the sins they committed. No one guess away with sin. No one.

Alba Douek

It is a fact that Diana's family had a better lineage than Charle's. Now, we all know that the terrible "puzzle" regarding her death still remains unfinished. There are still far too many pieces which did not fall into places- not even by pushing here or stretching there! Not one of the important questions has been answered in a satisfactory way…and we should NOT STOP until we get those answers! Charles and Camila, in other circumstances, have what I could call a forbidden, beautiful and maybe true/undying love… My romantic side could even find excuses for their lives apart (she was married, not a suitable candidate, etc.) and their love seems to have remained strong and alive throughout the years… But the fact that everything was a "sordid plan" (specially by Camilla who acted as a mastermind, choosing the perfect bride for Charles), makes me feel sick to my stomach! How can someone possible have used a very young, innocent and emotionally fragile girl, full of aspirations, in such a cold and cruel manner??? I have no words to express my feelings towards all those involved in the HELL that they turned Diana's life into. Diana was the one who… Read more »

Amii

I wonder why the boys Willy and Harry don't ever question their mother's death. Are they not exposed to the information out there available to them? If they have come across some sort of evidence or info that relates to their mother's death then why not question it, how can they know that knowledge and live with it!….Sometimes I wonder how much these boys even love or miss their mother. But that's a bit irrelevant, I think the old git by the title of 'our queen' must have brain washed them with a few lies!

Also in an article written here previously on a memorial that was done for Diana and Dody in Harrods, in which there were Free Masonic belongings all over…makes you wonder is Mohammed Al Fayed not aware of the illuminati behind his sons death if he allowed such Free Masonic objects to be present at their memorial OR is he not even aware that these are Free Masonic?…..Hmmm very thought provoking.

initsed

I remember the day that Diana died. My dad (RIP) who was working for the Ministry of Defence at the time said to me "It wasn't an accident, she was killed by M15/M16…"He was deadly serious. I think once she was started going out with Dodi and became pregnant by him…the establishment had had enough. It was time for her to go

ThirdEyeAwake

Princess Diana was killed for mainly two reasons: First, because she had millions of followers and the world loved her. Whatever she (could) have said would have turned the tied for the NWO Agenda. Secondly, she was going to marry a Muslim. It is widely known that the Illuminati HATES Muslims, hence why the "War In Iraq" pile of garbage and the psychological war against the Middle East (Whenever you think of 9/11, which was planned by the government, who do you think of? That's right, Muslims).

Also, she would have given birth to a Muslim baby, and again we all know the Illuminati take genetics and blood very seriously so what did they do to prevent ALL of this from happening?

They killed her. End of story.

Popular Now