Connect with us

Music Business

The Meaning of Paul McCartney’s “Who Cares”: It’s About MK ULTRA

In the music video “Who Cares”, Paul McCartney plays the role of a “behavioral hypnotist” who treats a confused Emma Stone. The intense symbolism of the video hints to a darker practice: MK ULTRA and Monarch Mind Control.



The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

This site often talks about young, brand new artists who were groomed by their record labels and released onto the world with a carefully calculated gimmick. Well, this article will not be about that kind of artist. It will be about a 76-year old icon who was part of the most influential group in the history of pop music and who attained the title of “living legend” about three decades ago.

Indeed, Paul McCartney began recording music over 60 years ago. He released over 30 albums as a member of The Beatles, Wings and as a solo artist. He was inducted in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1988 as a member of the Beatles and, again, in 1999 as a solo artist. He’s also an 18-time Grammy Award winner who has written or co-written 32 songs that reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 chart.

So, Paul McCartney is not exactly a newcomer. In fact, he’s been, for decades, the subject of the oldest conspiracy theory in the history of pop music: “Paul is Dead“.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

A magazine cover from the 1960’s about the alleged death of Paul McCartney.

This theory, which surfaced around 1967, asserts that McCartney actually died in a car crash in 1966 and was replaced by a look-a-like.

Proponents of the theory maintained that, in November 1966, McCartney had an argument with his bandmates during a Beatles recording session and drove off angrily in his car, crashed, and was decapitated. To spare the public from grief, or simply as a joke, the surviving Beatles replaced him with the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest. This scenario was facilitated by the Beatles’ recent retirement from live performance and by their choosing to present themselves with a new image for their next album, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band.
– Wikipedia, “Paul is Dead”

Those who believe that “Paul is Dead” analyzed the facial structure of the real McCartney versus the fake one, decoded hidden messages in the band’s song lyrics (some in reverse) and interpreted symbolism found in The Beatle’s album art.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The iconic cover of the album Abbey Road was interpreted by proponents of the “Paul is Dead” theory as a symbolic funeral procession for Paul McCartney. John Lennon, dressed in white, is said to symbolize the heavenly figure; Ringo Starr, dressed in black, symbolizes the undertaker; George Harrison, in denim, represents the gravedigger; and McCartney, barefoot and out of step with the others, symbolizes the corpse. The number plate of the white Volkswagen Beetle is “28IF” – representing McCartney’s age “if” he had still been alive. Furthermore, the left-handed McCartney holds a cigarette in his right hand which also supported the idea that he was an imposter.

Whoever Paul truly is, that person went on to have a long and prolific career. And he doesn’t appear to be close to retiring. His latest album Egypt Station debuted at #1 on the US Billboard 200.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The album cover of Egypt Station. Readers of this site will probably recognize some symbolism in there.

However, in this day and age, to remain part of the industry (even if you’re a “living legend”) you must embrace the elite’s agenda. And show your submission. And Paul did what he had to do.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

This is Paul McCartney’s photoshoot with GQ magazine around the time his album was released. Hiding one eye = submission to the occult elite.

Paul’s latest video Who Cares is yet another example of this fact. While the song has a distinct 1985 feel to it, the video is very 2019. Indeed, it has all of the symbolism and mind control messages found in countless pop videos nowadays.

Who Cares

Unlike the video, the song’s lyrics are quite simply: They’re about not caring about what others think. The chorus goes:

Who cares what the idiots say
Who cares what the idiots do
Who cares about the pain in your heart?
Who cares about you?
I do

In the video, actress Emma Stone plays the role of an anxious woman seeking treatment from Paul McCartney, who plays the role of a “behavioral hypnotist”. Then things sink quickly into the dark world of Monarch programming (if you don’t know what that is, read this article first). In fact, he turns into a mind control handler.

Right from the start, the video uses lots of imagery, references, and symbols that relate to mind control.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The video begins with various symbolic images that foreshadow what is about to happen. Here, a hypnotic spiral pattern over a page of text.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The title screen features a spiral and a lightning bolt – two symbols that will reappear in the video and that will take on an important meaning. There’s also a pair of antique stork scissors. Those were originally used by midwives to clamp and cut the umbilical cord of newborns. Why is it on there?

The actual video begins with Emma Stone entering a building from the emergency exit door. Right from the start, things are topsy-turvy.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Emma is wet from the rain because she didn’t have an umbrella. This detail will become important later on.

Then, Emma finds Paul McCartney’s office, who goes by a symbolic pseudonym.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

McCartney’s office door sign says: “Dr. Lorenz, Behavioral Hypnotist, Meteorologist”.

So why is McCartney called Dr. Lorenz and why is he also a meteorologist? These clues point to a specific person: Edward Norton Lorenz.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

One of Edward N. Lorenz’s seminal books. Is it a coincidence that the video is secretly about Monarch programming?

Edward Norton Lorenz was an American mathematician and meteorologist who founded modern chaos theory from which is derived the “butterfly effect” which theorizes that the flapping of butterfly wings can lead to a tornado. In Who Cares, the fields of psychology and meteorology are combined to tell a story rife happening in the inner-world of Emma Stone.

When Emma enters McCartney’s office (aka Dr. Lorenz), we immediately see lots of symbolic objects.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

On the left is a painting of a joker-like figure, drawn in a dualistic black and white pattern (pure Monarch programming symbolism). Of course, it has one eye hidden. Next to the painting is a statuette of Pan – the half-goat, half-human nature god  – a favorite figure of the occult elite. On the left is an umbrella which will end up representing Emma’s programming.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

As Emma sits with Dr. Lorenz, we see old-school equipment such as CRT TV displaying static and a pair of headphones on the head of a mannequin. It is all about clearing the mind.

Then Dr. Lorenz begins interacting with his patient with sentences that are reminiscent of NLP (neuro-linguistic programming).

“It’s a bit unruly here but, that’s the way it goes. Disorder. Out of order. Order out of disorder. It all gets a bit chaotic sometimes, doesn’t it?”

All of this relates to the chaos theory of the actual Dr. Lorenz. Also, as seen in previous articles, the main motto of the occult elite is “order out of chaos”.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Emma drinks a cup of tea given to her by Dr. Lorenz.

Right after drinking some of the tea, Emma spaces out. Was the tea laced with something? Drugs such as LSD are used in actual Monarch programming to facilitate the programming of MK slaves.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Then the Dr. opens a box that reveals a hypnotic spiral pattern. He tells her to focus on the pattern.

Then, the setting of the video changes drastically. Emma completely dissociates from reality (the goal of Monarch mind control) and enters a bizarre alternate dimension that is rife with symbolism. Not unlike classic MK tales such as The Wizard of Oz and Alice in Wonderland, this alternate world represents the dissociated slaves’ perception of reality while they are being programmed through trauma.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The world of dissociation is drastically different from the “real world”. It is all based on dualistic patterns.

While dissociated, Emma is constantly surrounded by dudes with faces painted half black and half white, not unlike the painting seen in Dr. Lorenz’s office.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

This painting by Kim Noble (a survivor of trauma-based mind control) uses the same exact dualistic pattern to represent herself as an MK slave.

In the video, these dualistic ‘demons’ torment Emma and take pleasure in subjecting her to various forms of trauma. The credits say that these guys are the “idiots” that McCartney sings about in the song’s chorus.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Dr. Lorenz is the head handler in charge of the “idiots”.

At face value, Dr. Lorenz teaches Emma to not care about what idiots say and do. That’s great advice. However, considering the MK symbolism found in the video, there’s a deeper meaning. While dissociated, Emma is actually being subjected to trauma by the “idiots”.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The idiots stab Emma’s exposed heart – a symbolic way of representing physical abuse.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Emma is stuck to a wheel and is spun around. Spinning slaves to cause disorientation is a classic programming technique. The inverted question mark alludes to the advanced state of confusion of the slave.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Emma is then stuck inside an elevator with eyes and a lightning bolts as eyebrows (more on this later).

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Inside the elevator: More trauma by the idiots.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

As programming progresses, Emma wears a mask that features a big, fat, one-eye sign. While, at face value, the umbrella represents her being “immune” to what the “idiots say”, the general MK context of the video and the umbrella’s dualistic pattern might imply that the umbrella actually represents her internalizing the handler’s programming.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Then, Emma gets struck by lightning. This is a great way to represent another trauma-inducing technique: Electroshock.

In the end, we see the final product of the programming.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

If you read other articles on this site, you know that this is pure MK symbolism: Duality, one-eye hidden and mouth covered. These symbols represent the blindness and the powerlessness of the programmed slave.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Paul makes a final one-eye sign (surrounded by spirals) to make sure you understand that he was playing the role of an MK handler in the video.

Then the video snaps back to reality.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Emma finds herself sitting alone in the room. There’s no more furniture. How long was she dissociated for?

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

The Dr. left a note to Emma saying “Don’t forget your umbrella” atop of the newspaper she used as an umbrella. On a deeper level, “Don’t forget your umbrella” means “Don’t forget your programming”. The signature is quite enigmatic.

The video ends with a prolonged outro featuring some curious objects.

The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

“Recommended drug doses for children”. So Dr. Lorenz also “treats” children? Hmmm…

In Conclusion

Who Cares manages to pack in 6 minutes a plethora of symbols that are directly associated with the occult elite. Paul McCartney plays the role of a hypnotist who uses the false premise of treating Emma Stone’s anxiety to lead her into dissociation and trauma-based mind control.

On a wider scale, this video proves that the elite’s agenda is unavoidable, even for iconic veteran artists such as Paul McCartney. To remain in the industry, all artists must abide by the Orwellian and totalitarian rules of the elite that forces all artists to adopt a specific set of symbols and narratives. And that includes promoting the elite’s most horrific practice: Monarch mind control.

Who cares? We do.

P.S. If you appreciated this article, please consider showing your support through a small monthly donation on Patreon. If you prefer, you can also make a one-time donation here. Thank you.


Support The Vigilant Citizen on Patreon.
The Meaning of Paul McCartney's "Who Cares": It's About MK ULTRA

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Get an e-mail notification as soon as a new article is published on The Vigilant Citizen.

Leave a Comment

newest oldest most voted

Thanks a lot. Your articles are very important.


“It was 20 years ago, today. Sargent Pepper taught the band to play.” – 1967
20 years previous was 1947, when a Major Pepper arrived in New York City as an agent of the BSC (British spook organization). He worked out of the British Passport Office in Rockefeller Center. His mission was to propagandize the American people in favor of Britain.
So…he taught the band to play, to propagandize the American people for the benefit of the cockroaches who rule over us (use drugs, join a bastardized version of Eastern religion, use more drugs).
btw – don’t call them ‘elites’ or any other positive word. This only gives them power. Use a negative word…I obviously prefer cockroaches.


Dude, what did roaches do to you? Even roaches have a purpose (some varieties actually control pests that affect certain crops) and are above these futards (this would be a better term for them, whatcha think?)

Thy Unveiling

Best to avoid words that end with “tard” in todays society. It tends to not go over well.

Plus, They view us as cockroaches and useless eaters. Why not flip it around on Them, as They so love to flip things around? If anyone is useless, it would be those at the “top” controlling things; they profit and benefit off those busting their butts trying to scrape by (us “useless” eaters) while They do…whatever it They do. Murder babies and get high on adrenochrome, probably.


I don’t think artists like McCartney are forced into this stuff. They are probably insiders and willing, even enthusiastic, participants.


Agree with that. I think most artists are just useful idiots, they stand where they’re told pose how thier told sing what thier told. They don’t know what’s really going or even care. Paul is different, he knows, maybe he’s even a key player and mastermind.


They are offered for life either from their own parents or are owned by the system if they are orphans so they don’t have a say they are not allowed to choose there is a very interesting channel in youtube who explains theirs and most artists’ role plays etc Narayan Dhekane


ups! I meant to say Narayan Dhekane @ Youtube


That Narayan site is garbage. I can’t believe you give it any credence. The video I watched there claimed that the Beatles swapped personalities and appearances with other bands and criminals, murderers e.t.c. Totally ridiculous and discredited. The author of the site is rightly being called a lunatic by commenters.


Once they “pass” or get to certain degree master or more, they are in for life and now they “program” control and handle newcomers is that sad!


The Beatles were using Masonic symbolism way back in the mid-sixties (around 1966). Since the cabal owns the entertainment industry, if you want to be successful you HAVE to submit. Paul must be high up in the organization since he’s been relevant for 55 years or so. All successful artists are involved, they are puppets and it makes me sad. I always felt Prince’s song “Darling Nikki” was about selling his soul to the devil for fame.


Maybe the whole “Paul is dead” rumor was simply an acknowledgement of the “death and rebirth” aspects of occult teaching (as portrayed in the initiation ceremony in the movie “The Skulls”). The spinning wheel makes me think about the myth of Ixion. The elevator was also in Prince’s song “Let’s Go Crazy” (also about the afterlife). Then we have the umbrella and we consider Rihanna’s song “Umbrella” – many have exposed the underlying meaning of that song and video (umbrella = control). The Beatles also had alleged connections to the Tavistock Institute – the symbolism speaks profoundly here. It has been about control from the start.


Are you saying that “Paul is dead” is a hoax?


“…Are you saying that “Paul is dead” is a hoax…” ?

Well I certainly am.

Chrissy Snow

I realized early on that the Beatles An did their members had a darker side. They came off as happy and positive in the beginning m, but if you really look, that’s not always reality. Their song “Run For Your Life” always gave me chills.

Run For Tour Life lyrics:
Well I’d rather see you dead, little girl
Than to be with another man
You better keep your head, little girl
Or I won’t know where I am

You better run for your life if you can, little girl
Hide your head in the sand little girl
Catch you with another man
That’s the end, little girl

Well I know that I’m a wicked guy
And I was born with a jealous mind
And I can’t spend my whole life
Trying just to make you toe the line

You better run for your life if you can, little girl
Hide your head in the sand little girl
Catch you with another man
That’s the end, little girl

Let this be a sermon
I mean everything I’ve said
Baby, I’m determined
And I’d rather see you dead

You better run for your life if you can, little girl
Hide your head in the sand little girl
I catch you with another man
That’s the end, little girl

Chrissy Snow

Spell check got me again. Apologies for the errors.


Or how about maxwell’s silver hammer another creepy murder song Joan was quizzical, studied pataphysical Science in the home Late nights all alone with a test tube Oh, oh, oh, oh Maxwell Edison, majoring in medicine Calls her on the phone “Can I take you out to the pictures Joa, oa, oa, oan?” But as she’s getting ready to go A knock comes on the door Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s silver hammer Came down upon her head Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s silver hammer Made sure that she was dead Back in school again Maxwell plays the fool again Teacher gets annoyed Wishing to avoid and unpleasant Sce, e, e, ene She tells Max to stay when the class has gone away So he waits behind Writing fifty times “I must not be So, o, o, o” But when she turns her back on the boy He creeps up from behind Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s silver hammer Came down upon her head Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s silver hammer Made sure that she was dead P. C. Thirty-one said, “We caught a dirty one” Maxwell stands alone Painting testimonial pictures Oh, oh, oh, oh Rose and Valerie, screaming from the gallery Say he must go free… Read more »


That’s a pretty great song. I always felt it was tongue-in-cheek.


Me, too. More in the spirit of Bugs Bunny violence. Dudes with silver hammers were not problems, but programming is. (PS. Nice job with the lyrics, but it’s “metaphysical science.” Occult, heh.)


Ya metaphysical makes more sense I just copy pasted the lyrics. However Bashing in skulls with hammers alludes back to Masonic ritual murder(don’t quote me on it but i think reserved for traitors). The upbeat lyrics and melody are there to disguise a deeper darker meaning. I’d agree with it being bugs bunny style violence if the line made sure she was dead, didn’t keep appearing.


Pataphysics is correct. See Wikipedia: Pataphysics or pataphysics (French: pataphysique) is a difficult to define literary trope invented by French writer Alfred Jarry (1873–1907).[1] One attempt at a definition might be to say that ‘pataphysics is a branch of philosophy or science that examines imaginary phenomena that exist in a world beyond metaphysics; it is the science of imaginary solutions.[2]

‘Pataphysics is a concept expressed by Jarry in a mock-scientific manner with undertones of spoofing and quackery, in his book of fiction titled Exploits and Opinions of Dr. Faustroll, Pataphysician, in which Jarry riddles and toys with conventional concepts and interpretations of reality.[3] Another attempt at a definition interprets ‘pataphysics as an idea that “the virtual or imaginary nature of things as glimpsed by the heightened vision of poetry or science or love can be seized and lived as real”.[1] Jarry defines ‘pataphysics in a number of statements and examples, including that it is “the science of imaginary solutions,


Agreed Rift.


It IS tongue in cheek. As if the “Paul Is Dead” farce wasn’t bad enough, now they’re reading things into their songs that aren’t there.


Just because the song has dark eccentric lyrics doesn’t infer that Paul is projecting his own thoughts.It’s meant as a boppy lighthearted song, not to be taken seriously.

( quote ) McCartney said: “‘Maxwell’s Silver Hammer’ is my analogy for when something goes wrong out of the blue, as it so often does, as I was beginning to find out at that time in my life. I wanted something symbolic of that, so to me it was some fictitious character called Maxwell with a silver hammer. I don’t know why it was silver, it just sounded better than Maxwell’s hammer. It was needed for scanning. We still use that expression now when something unexpected happens.”

He also later said: “In the past I may have written tongue-in-cheek, like ‘Maxwell’s Silver Hammer’, and dealt with matters of fate in a kind of comical, parody manner. It just so happens in this batch of songs I would look at these subjects and thought it was good for writing. If it’s good enough to take to your psychiatrist, it’s good enough to make a song of.” ( source ); Lyricinterpretations


There’s nothing sinister in it. The “little girl” referenced in the song was not an underage juvenile. It was one of John’s adult girlfriends at the time.”I’d rather see you dead, little girl, than to be with another man”- the line was taken from an early Elvis Presley song, “Baby Let’s Play House” (written by Arthur Gunter).

“There was a line in it, I used to like specific lines from songs, ‘I’d rather see you dead, little girl, than to be with another man.’ I wrote it around that…a line from an old blues song that Presley did” he said.

Lennon designated it as his “least favorite Beatles song” in a 1973 interview, and later said it was the song he most regretted writing. ( sources ) ; Wikipedia, Beatlesebooks


Spectrum sounds like a paid puppet of the elite. Yuck.


Elvis Presley raped underage girls so you might want to reconsider referring to him for justification.


Nice breakdown which shows the industry has been tainted longer than many realize. The Beatles music remains somewhat hypnotic and message laced to this day and they were perhaps some of the industries first experimentations. The scene was quite tame and innocent before they broke down some barriers and changed music towards a more experimental level.

One thing for certain is that the music industry does indeed seem black from within at all levels these days. They no longer hide this stuff and if one gets versed on VC, they start to see it at every level. My lack of respect for artists in the music industry and Hollywood is at an all-time low. It blows my mind how so many artists are lost, sold out souls whom if you look at them at a deep enough level are empty shells floating towards their self imposed burning annihilation.


Would like to share a little something that might be interesting. When I was a teen in high school during the late 60’s (1968?) my best friend and I drove up to the Hollywood hills to look for parties. We found a very strange one and hung around for about an hour. The party was in one of those old Hollywood mansions with a double staircase entrance. In the middle of the entryway there was a bathtub with a fire burning in it. There was very loud rock music and at least a hundred people dancing around the fire. It was too strange for us, so we started to leave. Someone walked up to us and started a conversation. They pointed to a house next door which was across a small canyon. The house was all painted up weirdly in very bright colors sort of like an abstract painting. It looked like someone went crazy splashing and painting in random patterns. This person pointed out to us that the Beatles had stayed there and were given a whole lot of acid (LSD) and created one of their iconic albums. I think it was the double White Album? The location makes… Read more »


I remember Allison. Had a hit with “Hey, 98.6.”


WOW!!! Ever the more blatant these days… not even trying to hide it anymore or make it subliminal. It’s just right there in your face.


I got caught up in the “Paul is Dead” thing about four years ago. My conclusion after too many hours investigating since then? Maybe Paul James McCartney is dead? Maybe Billy Shepherd really has been playing Paul since 1966? Maybe there’s multiple actors playing a part? It’s ultimately murky. In the end, despite compelling evidence, a conclusion always seems out of reach. And has been for decades.

But, the facts pointed out in this VC article say enough: Paul has been a mega-celebrity for 55+ years, and is STILL going strong. If you go back through his career, and watch the video interviews, read the lyrics, look at the symbolism in the artwork (including Semiramis, queen of Babylon, adorning the cover of Wings Greatest)… well, there’s a pretty clear path from The Beatles/Wings/McCartney to something very evil.

The interviews with Paul’s ex-wife Heather Mills are rather intriguing. She seems to know “something”. But what? Only The Lord, and those parties involved know. But one day… perhaps we’ll know.

Here’s one of those Heather Mills interview videos.


What she knows is that she witnessed Paul’s death the deconstructed (sic) story goes that Paul stopped to give her a ride, then the accident happened, “they” controllers & handlers have been paying her or keeping her quiet. I don’t remember her real name right now it was a long research by fans and others on other blogs which I don’t know if they are active right now, so the actual Paul had to even marry her I think the blogs were at WorldPress something like that o.o


I think you may be thinking of another woman attached to the car crash story (though I can’t remember that woman’s name). Paul was supposedly “replaced” in 1966/67. Those who claim he died in a car crash say that it happened in November ’66. Heather Mills was born in 1968. So she wasn’t alive when all this stuff happened.

I imagine Heather Mills married “Paul” and became aware of things the public doesn’t know, and would have a hard time believing (her words). Maybe she learned that “Paul” is just a character and she married an actor/musician? Only God knows. But it’s clear in the interview with Heather that she considered her own life was in danger, that Paul’s life was in danger (he’s a pawn), and she has put evidence in a locked safe as leverage to protect herself alive. She’s very cogent about it.

The Myrtle Tree

Wow. I’d never heard of that rumor. I’d always wondered why he went from being really cute to strange looking practically overnight. And, in that interview, she isn’t giving off any duplicity signals.


Another Great Article!


Just when you think they can not be more obvious, this video comes out….wow. Emma Stone is an interesting choice. I thought about the Netflix series Maniac instantly.


Research the Beatles and Tavistock.


Tina Foster has done an excellent book summarizing nearly every tidbit of information regarding PID. Her book is called Plastic Macca. This is a huge rabbit hole to go down if you haven’t already. Beyond the original photos and video footage of the original Paul you can tell he was a better songwriter, live musician, and much better looking. Unfortunately, they have actively been erasing and photoshoping those photos and changing the original recordings to acclimate the imposter.

Basically the real Paul wasn’t into the Tavistock/Laurel Canyon agenda of bringing the baby boomers into what became the drug fueled 60’s so they murdered him. Faul is one of the b-----d children of Allister Crowley trained at the age of 10 to be a musician and is now a master mason. They have continually planted clues throughout the years. Faul actually mocks the fans who can see it plain as day. The real Paul was asked in 1964 what he would be doing in a few years and he said ‘retire’.


Groupies–GTOS in los angeles. One told me Paul in the 60s screwed lots of underage girls.


All the groupies haunting the Riot House and other places on the Strip were 13-14…that was how it was back then. Culture is so pornified now, back then it was seen more as a natural act. Nobody was forcing Sable Starr and the others, heh. PS. Love this site, but it absolutely makes my computer crawl…

D D d

It was maybe the generation that was influenced heavily by the then booming television and media propaganda. For the parents the way the children behaved after watching hours of television a day was, well, new and overwelming. (Monkey see monkey do, again.)
Like we all are astounded by the people that are called millenials.
(Superselfish, never heared of imperial science and limited circles of brain activity before overreacting are example.)
GTO and other attention-sluts were a product of their time. The girls pretend to be sophisticated nowadays, but the difference in behaviour in minimal. Now here are millions of them globally instead of hundreds. How come? Media.


That’s how it was back in the 60’s and 70’s — you cannot look at this time period with a 2019 filter.


I remember Emma Stone from the “Superbad” comedy from 2007. She was this cute girl (I’m the same age as her) at the time and pretty much all us guys had a celebrity crush on her.

I didn’t know about Monarch and MK at the time but learned about it soon after. It was haunting watching her journey to become one of the biggest (broken) stars in the world.

The more of us know how to recognize these patterns in the movies and media, the more equipped we are with a vigilant outlook. We should all educate our families and bring up strong and brave children.

Bing bong

Something about her ascension is a bit off. She was floundering quite a bit for a while with underperforming projects and sometimes outright flops then becomes super duper A-list with a pretty much nothing-part in Birdman (that had NO business getting nominated). Now she can’t so much as fart without getting Oscar nominated. I do like her but she is objectively not as talented as her level of success (she IS getting better though). I wonder if she sold her soul at some point to become this big. To see her in such a blatant video as above is frankly disappointing. And to mask it as some anti bullying thing (because who could possibly be opposed to such a positive thing) is even more revolting. Sad.

Mr MOJO Risin

Another excellent deconstruction. For many years I’ve heard the rumor the John revealed too much in a Playboy interview he did shortly before his death. Maybe he admitted what happened to Paul.


Can you link this info please?


I don’t know, if this is correct interview, what he said about, but I’ll link it here:


Just put “Lennon, Playboy interview” in DuckDuckGo. Always learn more doing your own research.


Nothing happened to Paul, he’s the same person he’s always been ;


Spectrum the troll is back peeps! Always on time aye! How much do they pay you to tell people lies!?


The lightning bolts probably also are meant to be symbols for satan himself besides the electroshocks.

“And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven”
Luke 10:18

Head in a Jar

Did anyone else think that McCartney looks a lot like Woody Allen in the first picture in this article?

D D d

I think there might be more than one reference. But can not be bothered to see the whole clip. VC has done more than enough job of that.
Maybe the last bit about young people is included?


Maybe the dead Paul is the lucky one.

Maybe him being dead was a symbol of having gone through the OTO MK Ultra programming, and now the old Paul was dead?


That is a common trait w artists such as Michael Jackson, but Paul was definitely dead on a car crash, the band was mourning him for years they were forced to accept the Faul / newcomer paul in and it took them many years to accept and even credit him John admitted he did his best and had gained his place by his own abilities but truth is that was part of the reason why they then broke the band apart.


Naw. It was a fun game, but Paul’s the same Paul–just a bigger ego and a sense of “I can do no wrong” after all these years. No dead Paul.


Paul is NOT dead, fool.


Bored of this troll Spectrum!


The idiots reminds me of the hands in billie eilish “bury a friend” music video

Thomas Anderson

Conclusive evidence that Paul was replaced:


What are you saying that is conclusive evidence please?


You can see they are two different people….Paul was replaced and the world was once again fooled!


Can you do a video of Elton John’s music video, Bennie and the Jets? Black and white video, characters in strange costumes. Very bizarre.

VC on Patreon

Support The Vigilant Citizen on Patreon and get exclusive rewards.

E-Mail Notifications

Get an e-mail notification as soon as a new article is published on this site.