Before the cameras even started rolling, most of us knew that the 2024 Grammy Awards would be unhealthily centered around Taylor Swift. It just had to happen. There is currently a heavy-handed media campaign surrounding her and a growing number of people are noticing that a bizarre, artificially generated frenzy is taking place. And many are wondering what’s the end goal of it all. Is she being “propped up for something”?

It’s a vicious circle: The more Taylor gets media attention, the more people pay attention to the media.

This whole campaign started with Taylor’s super-mediatized relationship with NFL player Travis Kelce. This union between the worlds of entertainment and pro sports generated a media frenzy of absurd proportions.

Televised games of the Kansas City Chiefs constantly cut away to Taylor Swift reacting to whatever was happening on the field. It annoyed lots of people. Yet, lots of other people started watching these games specifically to see Taylor doing her Taylor faces.

The ridiculous media frenzy surrounding the couple – but mostly Taylor Swift – raised many eyebrows. It simply doesn’t seem normal or organic. It seems fake and custom-made by media experts to generate a specific type of media attention.

Then, the Chiefs made it to the Superbowl – one of the biggest sporting events in the world. It just had to happen. And, while Swift was set to perform in Japan shortly before the Super Bowl, the Embassy of Japan told the world that there was nothing to worry about. Queen Taylor will grace the world with her presence.

Government officials confirmed that we will all get the Taylor Swift reaction shots we all want during the Super Bowl. And imagine if the Chiefs win?! OMG!

This unprecedented (and some say unwarranted) media circus led some observers to believe that this whole Taylor Swift extravaganza is actually a psyop – psychological warfare operation meant to influence the masses. The ultimate goal: At the height of her popularity, and right before the elections, Taylor Swift would support Joe Biden.

Vivek Ramaswamy believes this is all fake and that even the Super Bowl is rigged to make sure the world gets its Taylor Swift moment.

As if to prove the conspiracies right, the elite-owned propaganda outlet The Guardian published an article about Taylor influencing votes, complete with a one-eye sign pic.

Meanwhile, a video from 2019 recently resurfaced that is said to be proof that Taylor Swift is a propaganda asset. Titled Information Warfare Defining and Analysing, this NATO conference centered around the theme of “Silent Battle”. One speaker at the conference stated:

“The idea is that social influence can help, can help encourage or promote behavior change, and the theory here is the sense that this sort of approach works as well with regards to misinformation.”

As explained in previous articles, “misinformation” is the elite’s Orwellian term to define anything that goes against their agenda.

A slide from the presentation shows a picture of Taylor Swift as an example of an “opinion leader” that can be “trained to spread desired messaging”.

The speaker stated:

“I include Taylor Swift in here because she’s, you know, she’s a fairly influential online person. I don’t know if you’ve heard of her. … This is a cropped image, but she’s standing next to, you know, a ‘Go vote’ sign. And, actually, celebrities, at least in the U.S., regularly will post pictures of themselves with an encouragement to people to go vote, and this has a measurable effect on voter turnout.”

The “Taylor Swift is a psyop” conspiracy gained so much traction that the actual Pentagon had to chime in. Indeed, Department of Defense Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh told Forbes:

“Taylor Swift is not part of a DOD psychological operation. Period.”

Some would say: That’s exactly what a DOD psychological operation would say. This was followed by an onslaught of mainstream news sources denying the conspiracy and ridiculing whoever propagates it.

Then, the Grammys came about. And, if Taylor Swift was an actual psyop, the Grammys would have gone down exactly how it actually went down.

The 2024 Grammys

As usual, the 2024 Grammys centered around a very limited number of artists. And, as usual, the show contained its fair share of deranged industry agendas. Here are some examples.

During SZA’s performance, the singer stabs a man. Then, sword-wielding women massacre several men who then lie lifeless on stage as SZA sings “Uh, I just killed my ex (my ex)”.

This violent display is in perfect continuation of the man-killing agenda that has been observed on this site for years. The reason why these hateful and violent displays are allowed in mass media: fEmAniZm – the elite’s hateful and distorted version of feminism.

Later, Lizzo came out and presented a Grammy to SZA. And everyone clapped.

In case you forgot, Lizzo is being sued for several things that she is supposedly against, highlighting the extreme hypocrisy of these industry “entertainers”.

Only two days before the Grammy’s, a judge denied Lizzo’s attempts at dismissing the trial.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge cleared the way for a lawsuit by three former dancers against Lizzo to move forward after denying the singer’s request to dismiss the case. The Grammy-winning artist, known for her uplifting messages of self love and body positivity, is facing accusations of racial discrimination, sexual harassment, fat-shaming, and a number other offenses in a lawsuit filed last August.
– The Daily Beast, Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Lizzo Advances After Judge Denies Dismissal

Why was Lizzo at the Grammys? fEmAniZm?

Then there was Olivia Rodrigo’s performance of the song Vampire.

Rodrigo performed her hit single smeared in blood while more blood poured from the walls in the background.

This is a continuation of another elite agenda: The normalization of consuming and bathing in human blood. Rodrigo is doing her part to normalize this practice and making it “cool”.

While Miley Cyrus won an award for her mega-hit Flowers (which was the most streamed song of 2023), the show culminated with everyone bowing down to … yes … Taylor Swift.

The Taylor Swift Ritual

More than 14 years ago, I wrote about Taylor Swift being involved in a fake, scripted “ritual” at the 2009 VMAs.

It started with Kanye West jumping on stage and telling Swift that she didn’t deserve her first award ever.

This memorable event was all about humiliating her in front of her peers – an age-old component of initiation rituals. In my article titled The 2009 VMAs: The Occult Mega-Ritual, I wrote:

Taylor Swift wins the “Best Female Video” award and goes up on stage to give her thank yous. Kanye West pops out of nowhere, taking the mic from her hand, and informs her that Beyonce has “one of the best videos of all time“. This scene has caused much controversy and has earned Kanye the title of “Douchebag of the year” plus the honor of being called a “jackass” by the President of the United States.

I might shock some people by saying this… but this “unexpected” event was… STAGED! There I said it. Did you ever watch a crappy reality show and had the gut feeling that the whole thing was scripted? Well, I’ve got an overload of that feeling while watching this scene. None of the people involved (not even Beyonce making her “I can’t believe this is happening” face) are good actors. Furthermore, I’ve been following Kanye’s career since his beginnings and I’ve retained one important fact about him: The only thing Kanye West cares about, is Kanye West. So if he had to throw a hissy fit about something, it would have been about him not winning. Not Beyonce. Him.

This scene is, in fact, Taylor Swift’s initiation into what I call “The Circle of Chosen Artists”. The pupil is humiliated in front of her peers and told that she is not worthy to be on the same stage as Beyonce, the queen of the ceremony.  Almost all groups, fraternities and gangs carry out an initiation process to test the recruit’s character, strength, and worth. Swift’s ordeal was to have Kanye ruin her first award ever and to be told that she didn’t deserve this recognition. The rapper is known for bitching during award shows so he was the perfect candidate to make it all seem “unexpected”.

Later in that show, Swift was “accepted” by none else than Beyonce.

After Swift’s public humiliation, Beyonce, the queen of the ceremony, calls her up on stage to let her “have her moment”. She appears from backstage (as if awaiting her cue) in a red dress which is strikingly similar to Beyonce’s. (…)

Taylor Swift being called on stage represents the fact that she has now been accepted as an equal to Beyonce and has become one of the “chosen ones”. The matching dresses also convey this sense of belonging to a new group. She has “passed the test” – the ordeal of being humiliated – and she can now reap the rewards of being an insider.
– Ibid.

In other words, Taylor Swift has been involved in bizarre, symbolic, and ritualistic events for a long time.

At the 2024 Grammys, we’ve witnessed an oddly similar situation.

At the 2024 Grammys, Taylor Swift was coupled with Lana Del Rey. Their outfits had a dualistic black-and-white theme happening where Lana looked as if she just attended a funeral and Swift was in pure, virginal white.

At the very end of the Grammys, Celine Dion came out to present the most important award of the show: Album of the Year. This was a big deal because Celine has been battling with serious health issues and has been avoiding events for months.

Celine about to tell the world what it already knows.

By winning this award, Taylor would become the only artist to ever win Album of the Year four times, thus breaking a record and making history.

So she had to win. It had to happen.

And, of course, Celine Dion said the words everyone was fully expecting: “Taylor Swift”.

Everyone was expecting it … except, apparently, Taylor Swift. She seemed VERY surprised as she did that “I’m surprised this is happening” face she always does. This is all so fake.

Then, Swift walks toward the stage while dragging along with her a reluctant Lana Del Rey (who had just lost to her). It was weird.

On stage, Swift takes the award from Celine while completely ignoring her.

Swift’s “snub” of Celine immediately made headlines because it was deemed disrespectful. I watched it live and, honestly, it truly felt awkward and disrespectful. It was also very symbolic: It was about a diva of the past passing the torch to today’s diva.

During the acceptance speech, Celine and Lana flanked the new queen Taylor.

During her speech, Swift acknowledged Lana Del Rey as a “legacy artist and a legend” … while Celine Dion was standing there still being ignored. While Lana Del Rey is indeed a hugely popular artist, Celine Dion is the only person on stage who could be called a “legacy artist and legend”. Throughout her career, Del Rey sold 41 million albums. Celine? 250 million.

In short, the 2024 Grammys ended with the coronation of Taylor Swift and the humiliation of her rivals and predecessors. She had to win and she did. And everybody clapped.

In Conclusion

The media attention surrounding Taylor Swift has become a topic of conversation in countless households in America and around the world. If a PR company was to be hired with the mission of making Taylor Swift even more visible and influential outside of her “Swifties” fanbase, a relationship with Travis Kelce would have been the perfect plan.

And it happened. And it worked. Way too perfectly. And, as if carried by manifest destiny, Taylor’s team charged toward the Super Bowl with no resistance, setting the stage for a media event of epic proportions. While the Super Bowl itself is a mega-event in its own right, the most important “player” of the 2024 edition won’t even play on the field. It’ll be Taylor Swift. Will the game be rigged to give Taylor her media moment?

Coincidentally enough, exactly one week prior to the Super Bowl, the 2024 Grammys were also “rigged” to give Taylor her moment. She was given the Album of the Year award by Celine Dion, becoming the first artist to ever win this “prestigious” (not really) award four times.

So, is this all a “psyop”? Well, I wrote that Taylor Swift was a “chosen one” nearly 14 years ago. She is clearly being built up to reach a level of visibility that transcends her musical career. But is this all happening so she can eventually give her support to Joe Biden? I don’t believe this is the end game. Swift might be propped to become a political figure in her own right. You think I’m crazy? I might write about this in about 14 years.

VC E-Book