I want to preface this article by stating that it is not partisan. I’m Canadian, so I didn’t have a horse in this race. In fact, a Trump presidency will most likely negatively affect Canada’s economy due to the imposition of tariffs. And, if Trump goes ahead with mass deportations, illegal immigrants will most likely flock to Canada, and we all know that our WEF-controlled Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will do nothing about it.

That said, this site is about objectively analyzing media, and we have been flooded with a tsunami of it in the past weeks. And, no matter one’s political leanings, one has to admit that the Kamala Harris campaign was one of the worst in recent history. It perfectly encapsulated the elite’s advanced state of “out-of-touchness” as every attempt at appearing relatable looked like outright satire. Sometimes, I thought, “Are they deliberately trying to lose?”

Kamala Harris’ campaign relied on nearly unlimited funds, the unwavering support of legacy media, and a constant stream of celebrity endorsements. Despite all of this, she lost spectacularly. How could this have possibly happened?

Well, many of us saw this coming a mile away. Although Kamala had all the necessary resources to win, she was like Dorothy at the beginning of The Wizard of Oz: She needed a brain, a heart, and courage to complete her quest. However, her campaign showed none of these things. She didn’t have the brain to answer basic questions and devise a coherent program. She didn’t have the heart to truly connect with citizens, as she let disconnected Hollywood pawns speak for her. Finally, she lacked the courage to take a firm stand on issues, as she constantly resorted to vague, non-sensical platitudes to weasel her way out of essential questions.

This led many to realize: If Kamala doesn’t want to say anything, why am I even listening to her? So, millions of people completely tuned her out and dismissed her as a potential President. Considering that only a few million Americans were still undecided at that point, that was very unfortunate for her.

Despite Kamala being a catastrophic choice for the Democratic Party, donors (such as Bill Gates) threw hundreds of millions of dollars at her as an army of operatives and PR specialists shaped her image. Their goal: To make this terrible candidate appear cool, trendy, relatable, and, if we still have time, Presidential.

Unfortunately for Kamala, those in charge of her propaganda were terrible at it. At every turn, they churned out some of the cringiest and tone-deaf attempts at political advertising in recent history.

Here’s a look at some of the lowlights of her campaign.

Kamala is Brat

After Biden’s disastrous debate—which proved that he was a geriatric zombie controlled by hidden forces—Kamala was forcibly shoved down the Democratic Party’s throat. Now, she needed to be shoved down the entire country’s throat. The early strategy was clear: to distance herself from Biden’s senior energy and connect with Gen Z.

So her staffers looked at TikTok and noticed a bit of a buzz around British pop singer Charli XCX and her album Brat. In what they thought was a stroke of genius, the Kamala campaign co-opted the album’s aesthetic and the “Brat summer” trend (while instantly sucking all of the coolness out of it.)

But what is “brat”? Here’s a quick sum up.

The international phenomenon swept millions off their feet and plunged them head first into the “dirty girl” aesthetic that xcx’s sixth studio album, brat cultivated. (..) Lime green, cigarettes, black eyeliner, nose-drugs, white shirts, and going braless have been capitalized on for three months and don’t seem to be going away anytime soon.
– The Highland Echo

So, to kick off her campaign, Kamala associated herself with the marketing scheme of a pop album that revolved around young girls being messy, doing cocaine, and partying all night. It worked for Charli XCX because her job is to make party music. But Kamala Harris was trying to become the literal President of the United States. Also, in complete opposition to that vibe, she traveled the country with Liz Cheney, the daughter of the evilest warmonger in American history.

Exactly.

That said, the brat thing wasn’t even close to her worst campaign stunt.

Sick of Celebrities

The Kamala campaign then started calling her opponents “weird.” This was when her campaign had the most momentum as the “weird” thing gained some traction and even rattled Trump for a second.

But then, the Harris campaign realized they couldn’t surf on a one-word insult until the elections. She had to say things to potential voters. To generate some enthusiasm for her pointless speeches, Harris’ campaign hired a long list of celebrities. While that’s been an effective strategy for the Democratic Party in the past, Kamala’s team should have sensed that people were not in the mood for it this year.

Meghan Dee Stallion throws up devil horn signs during her 4-song performance at the Kamala rally in Atlanta, Georgia.

During her cringe-inducing set, Stallion twerked and rapped lyrics such as “P—y like water” and “N–gas say I taste like sugar, but ain’t s–t sweet.” Did this stunt resonate with Americans? Well, Trump won Georgia.

In another head-scratching move, the Harris campaign used … Lizzo. Yes, the same Lizzo that was accused of sexual harassment, weight shaming, and creating a hostile work environment by her dancers.

She’s toxic. And she was hired by Harris.

Lizzo posted this video on social media in support of Harris. Set your face to cringe.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Lizzo (@lizzobeeating)

Yes, Lizzo said, “You b*tches can’t spell democracy” before boarding her private jet. Then, in a speech, Lizzo declared that she wanted Harris to turn the entire United States into Detroit. Did this stunt resonate with Americans? Well, Trump won Michigan.

During Trump’s MSG rally, the comedian Kill Tony made a questionable joke about Puerto Rico being a “floating island of garbage.” However, he also made a devastatingly accurate joke about Kamala’s celebrity endorsements resembling Diddy’s parties.

What does Kamala’s campaign do to counter that? They bring out someone who was literally at Diddy’s parties.

In an attempt to use the Puerto Rico joke to reign in Latino voters, Kamala brought out Jennifer Lopez.

Yes, Kamala associated herself with J-LO at the very same time that her ex Diddy was being accused of raping teenage boys. J-LO was around while this stuff was happening, and her being complicit is not out of the question.

J-LO at one of Diddy’s parties. The girl in the middle is Aaliyah. She was controlled by industry predators from the age of 14 until her suspicious death in 2001.

In short, it wasn’t the time to bring out J-LO to be performatively offended about a joke. But did this stunt resonate with Americans? Well, Latinos voted for Trump in record numbers.

I’m a Man. Kind Of.

At one point, Harris’ campaign came to a shocking realization: Lizzo flipping her wig and calling people b*tches did not appeal to male voters. So, her staffers concluded that they needed to target men with an ad campaign. They came up with Man Enough, one of the worst-conceived and tone-deaf political advertisements ever released. If you have not watched this gem yet, prepare to witness history.

The campaign had a genius idea to reach the seemingly enigmatic demographic of “manly men: ” Hire a former Jimmy Kimmel producer and a bunch of gay actors from Los Angeles to act as “manly men.”

Internet sleuths looked up this actor and discovered he was a gay actor from Los Angeles. The way he’s sitting says it all.

At one point, this actor says, “I ain’t afraid of bears.” In gay culture, a bear is a man who is fat, hairy, or both. Was this ad satire?

Other key moments: An overweight dude awkwardly holding a bucket who talks about “eating carburetors for breakfast” and a creepy bearded man who’s OK with “women wanting to control their bodies.” As if that wasn’t enough comedy, the gay guy seen above comes back and says that he’s giving Harris his “full-throated endorsement.”

In short, this ad is precisely how people out of touch with reality and who’ve been trained to hate masculinity would portray “manly men.” Are they aware that “manly men” don’t only exist on farms? Similarly to the entire Kamala campaign, the ad doesn’t ring true and reeks of hypocrisy and condescension.

Later, the Harris campaign also realized that it lacked the support of younger men. The PR geniuses devised this strategy.

Tim Walz plays a video game with a bottle of Mountain Dew. Fun fact: His controller is not turned on.

This stunt backfired spectacularly. The optics are just bad. It’s not vice-presidential; it’s cringy. And Walz looks like an old dude trying to lure young boys playing Fortnite.

Meanwhile, the Harris campaign also realized that it was hemorrhaging the support of black men. So they sent a very disappointed Barak Obama to lecture them, like a father about to take off his belt. Not only does he imply that black men “owe” a vote to his party, but he insinuates they are misogynistic for not supporting a woman.

This authoritarian berating session was not well received by black men. They do not owe a vote to Barack for being half-black, like they do not owe a vote to Kamala for being half-black. Like every other citizen, they can vote for whoever aligns with their views and interests.

Meanwhile, the Harris campaign also realized that it was severely behind with white men. So, after days of intense research and millions of dollars spent on PR specialists, they devised a genius campaign: “White Men for Harris.” Yup.

This cringy display backfired spectacularly.

Did these efforts to pander to men resonate with Americans? We all know the answer to this question.

Lie to Your Husband

At the same time that they were pandering to men, the Kamala campaign told women to lie to their husbands. Directed by Hollywood hack Julia Roberts (who recently starred in the Obama’s horrific movie Leave the World Behind), the ad encouraged women to lie to their (implicitly abusive) husbands and vote for Harris.

This ad is toxic and astonishingly out of touch with reality. Are they really trying to put Kamala Harris between a wife and her husband? Are they really encouraging women to betray the sanctity of marriage and lie to the father of their children? For Kamala?

The low moral values that permeate this ad is highly telling. And, yes, it backfired.

Manipulating Reddit

In my article about the Trump assassination attempt, I suggested that the shoot was probably radicalized by Reddit, one of the most visited sites by younger people (by the way, authorities never revealed what was on that guy’s phone – most likely to protect such sites).

To corroborate this fact, an investigation by The Federalist revealed that the Harris campaign was heavily manipulating Reddit. This eye-opening article explains how Harris operatives coordinated efforts to spam the site with pro-Harris posts. Then, the staffers would use fake accounts to upvote the posts and steer the comments towards the desired narrative.

The results of this investigation are extremely telling as they describe the modus operandi of internet shills on Reddit and all social media platforms.

A Kamala staffer sends the daily agendas that must be pushed to its army of internet shills.

Using Discord servers and Google spreadsheets, the psyop campaign tracks posts made, ensuring they are spammed in the most relevant communities.

This is a screenshot of a Google spreadsheet that tracks the date, the subreddit, and the agenda being shilled.

On Oct. 20, 13 of the 100 newest posts were created by Harris-Walz campaign operatives.

It was also discovered that the staffers specifically targeted swing states subreddits. Did this propaganda strategy resonate with Americans? Well, every single swing state voted for Trump.

In Conclusion

From beginning to end, the Kamala Harris campaign was objectively the worst in recent history. Although it was palpable that people were sick and tired of out-of-touch celebrities lecturing them and telling them what to think, the campaign trotted out one Hollywood degenerate after another. Although people were sick and tired of identity politics and being categorized according to one’s gender and race, the Kamala campaign tried to get white men to wear shirts that said “white men” on them. Although people were sick and tired of authoritarian control and censorship of social media, Kamala’s campaign doubled down on it.

In short, this campaign tried to force Kamala down America’s throat using the sheer force of elite-sponsored propaganda. But it was so obvious, heavy-handed and out-of-touch that it backfired spectacularly.

Some might ask: What about Trump? Well, Trump was Trump. Whether you like him or not, he put on his orange makeup, combed his hair, and talked his butt off for hours about issues that concerned all Americans, such as the economy and illegal immigration. And that resonated with Americans.

Does that mean that the globalist agenda will be put to a halt? Sadly, it is unlikely. Some tend to forget that the “woke” agenda was at its peak when Trump was in power. It is easier to sell ideas to the masses when presented in opposition to an “oppressive power.” In this sense, Trump can be useful to the elite. Expect some chaos as the elite’s dormant subversive groups (e.g., Antifa) will most likely be activated in the coming months.

Their propaganda machine has failed miserably, but that doesn’t mean they’ll stop trying.

VC E-Book