Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria (video)

94

Leaked Department of Defense documents prove that the U.S. purposely allowed ISIS to take hold of Syria.

In my article entitled ISIS : A CIA Creation to Justify War Abroad and Repression at Home, I list the numerous reasons why ISIS is actually serving the interests of the world elite. The following video adds another important piece of the puzzle by explaining leaked Department of Defense documents dating from 2012 – before ISIS even existed. They prove that the U.S. actually supported the radical Islamist groups in Syria and Iraq that eventually morphed into the monster that is ISIS.

This series of event lead to the creation of a (larger) quagmire in the Middle East, the migration of millions of Syrians towards the West and and the generation of fear and panic around the world – perfect conditions for rushing new oppressive laws.


SHARE
Loading...

Leave a Comment

94 Comments on "Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria (video)"

10000
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

I have to ask you something. If THEY want us to be controlled in every possible aspect, why would we be able to see leaked documents on the CBS which is owned by THEM?

The NWO manipulators seem to be deliberately getting more blatant year after year, perhaps to test us as part of the masses as to our level of continued ignorance, to the point that they can reveal in-your-face documents saying the truth about what they are doing and yet in the end most people won’t bother thinking about it anyway and anyone else that does so can be safely labeled as a conspiracy nutjob. The fact alone that the CIA ‘allows’ releasing of their documents revealing past operations to the public through so-called FOIA requests means at this point they feel they can manipulate us all no matter what they say. Operation Mockingbird = pay the media off to send propaganda news in the 1950s (I think), Project MKUltra = mind control through LSD, and many other CIA documents and operations and projects are publicly out now years after they’ve been… Read more »
It is indeed highly suspicious this gets allowed to broadcast (even the Eye in CBS logo). VC recently covered another ‘Reality Check’ cast about Pizzagate. I think the most likely reason is as arciba said: They’re essentially mocking people, celebrating how people just don’t believe in or won’t accept the reality of these things. So, it doesn’t matter if they air this. Also, without knowing anything about this ‘reality check’ program: Doesn’t it strike people as more than a little odd CBS allows it? There’s a big crackdown on ‘fake news’ in the media following Pizzagate in particular (with 1984-style concepts like Zuckerberg’s CIAbook openly discussing the option of discriminating against viewpoints that don’t conform to consensus reality) so why would CBS, who’d you presume wishes to be seen as an intelligent, rational station allow something like ‘Reality Check’ in this political climate? The thing is, the Illuminati seem to… Read more »

I am a muslim, Asian, and proudly saying myself as a Salafi.
I agree with 'A. Human'. Salafi is not behind ISIS because it is not what is in Alquran or in the guidance from our prophet (praise be upon him).
They use the term 'salafi' to all of the extremist, which is totally wrong. I don't know why but I will never support or agree with any terrorist attacks.
And even in my learning I never found that it is allowed to coup the legitimate leaders of my country even though the government is corrupt and the citizens are suffering.

There are extrimists, yes. But it is not because of the religion, it is because they are misguided..

It's a sad world when you have a bunch of politicians voted into office by the people of this country, and they commit such atrocities… This has been going on far too long!.. Thousands of americans has lost their lives because of this treachery, it's time for the american people to wake up and stop voting for the 2 party system!.and remove all politicians with dual citizenship.. If your loyalty is not for America alone?.. Then you should not represent the country!.. Our freedom is not for sale!.. The Republicans and Democrats are committing Treason!

Michael Savage has been saying this for a while now. He says the West created ISIS (or backed it) and points out that within days of the Paris attacks, France bombs "key" ISIS targets. He questions when and where France got this information. Did they just get it after the attacks? Or did they have it for weeks or months? They most probably had it BEFORE the attacks. Why didn't they bomb them BEFORE the attacks? A lot of good questions.

Who is Ben Swann? What is Reality Check? Im all for further research and evidence, but Im surprised VC hasnt added any commentary about why this particular video carries particular weight?

Ben Swann was doing a show on RT and Amazon Prime and Netflix probably where he explored all kinds of investigative journalism. His video on WTC 7 is a classic. Dude is legit.

Appreciate your feedback Marko. Thank you. Admittedly, I didnt research him before I posted…but I also like sources and verification included in pieces others share too, for credibility….and i think this is a very credible page and was for the first time surprised to see little back up as to why this was "proof" (hence my original comment). Thank you! Thanks for expanding my knowledge…thats why i read this page- the articles and also the reader comments. We are all learning.

Thank you VC great article as always

I just want to make a comment about "The Paris attacks: if the Paris attacks are "legitimate" terror attack then where is the manifesto or claim of responsibility? No real terrorist group would carry out such a dramatic attack and let the government control the "narrative"? They did it cos they hate "our freedom" really? If Andres Breivik can have a manifesto then so can the preparations of the Paris attacks!! Let's see the manifesto or it's a fraud.

FYI: interesting fact the owners of the Paris Bataclan theater were Jewish who sold on Sep 11 , 2015 hmmm very interesting?? Not to mention that they used to own it for about almost 40 years, you can do the research.

Turkey will disrupt this game!

King narcissist Erdogan and the Turkish people foolish and weak enough to allow such a despicable autocrat to rule will disrupt nothing. Go back to school – wait, not an option with the crackdown on the education system.

Talk about the pepsi comercial , dark knight decoded

I find it disturbing that the Republican presidential candidates are espousing nakedly fascist views towards Muslims. I have to wonder if it's now the plan to mainstream fascism by making it familiar through repetition in the media.

http://www.salon.com/2015/11/25/the_unprecedented

It isn’t just the republicans, it is everyone regardless of their worthless party affiliation. this has been going on for a very long time – demonize Muslims. Make them the “other” so one can feel good about themselves and unite non-Muslims so you feel falsely connected. it is sick. this world is very depressing.

We need to examine what Muslim say about the US. It is way more fascinating than all the candidates combined..

refreshing to see such a commentary on the MSM. thanks VC

better be careful ben, you get up on the chopping block for this kinda stuff. appreciate your bravery.

we as vigilant citizens already knew something was up…

Yes, indeed. What we're seeing happening in France – Mr Hollande "measures" against terrorism, is a sketch of what is to come in the whole world. As the govt control the mainstream media, is up to us inform and make a contra rise, pointing disinfo and conflicting facts. Share anything you can, like this VC article, to spread the truth.

I resent the fact that "Salafism" is being portrayed as another terrorist offshoot. Salafiyyah is simply a return to practising Islam as it was understood and practiced by the early generations of Muslims. It has nothing to do with terrorism – in fact, it is the exact opposite to the ideology adopted by extremists. But you'll never hear that in the Western media, and unfortunately, most people won't do their research.

exactly you are completely correct Ibn Mustafa. Salafi comes from the Arabic word salaf which mean 'past' or what has 'preceded' /'come before'. As muslims we have been told to follow the prophet (peace be upon him) and his righteous companions and those who followed them in righteousness. This alludes to the 1st three generations of muslims who were the best of people as is alluded to in the 73 sects hadith. So….the 1st 3 generations of muslims are to be followed and they in Arabic are referred to as the SALAF. To follow the prophet (peace be upon him) and his righteous companions and those who followed them in righteousness makes one a SALAFI, and in fact all muslims are salafi unless they are involved in bid'ah/innovation because our religion is NOT based on human desires and individual interpretation. ISIS are NOT salafi, they are the KHAWAARIJ!!! They actually… Read more »

Vigilant Citizen: thank you once again and please keep them coming, we need more people like you.

IS, ISIS, ISIL is the new name of AQI (al qaeda in iraq). It's rather disappointing CBS didn't know or they couldn't research that simple fact. That expression and not the vague "salafists" expression was the real smoking gun.

CBS….certain bull sh*t

I though AQ denounced IS as being too extreme?

PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE THE EFF UP!!

while majority of muslims agreed that shi'ite are misguided sect of islam, the salafi, in this case is salafi wahabi is ultraconservative radical sect of islam. the seed of hatred between them is already there, and now the so called elites pouring oil to the fire for their own agenda.

it's part of the prophecy that islam will be divided into 73 sect, that's why it is easy to bring into conflict between them.

Ugghh! I can't take this anymore. The Salafis are the #1 enemy of ISIS. ISIS are KHAWAARIJ. Even CNN had a report saying that the Arab States are the #1 enemy of ISIS and the Salafis were #2. I was shocked they actually told something that was the truth! Salaf means predecessor and it is an ascription to the pious predecessors including the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and the first three generations of Muslims. The Salafis stick to their understanding of the Quran and Sunnah and those Imaams of guidance who followed the authentic texts after that. The KHAWAARIJ (i.e. ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Nusra front and so on…) are described this way from the root word "kharaja" in arabic which means to go out. I.e. they exit the religion and exit others from the religion and their particular specialty is declaring the Muslim ruler to be… Read more »
In other narrations he described them as having outward piety that would seem to outdo the rest of the Muslims from excessive prayer and fasting. They make takfeer (excommunicate) Muslims declaring them to be disbelievers and making their blood permissible to be spilled why they are also called takfeeri. Again, the Salafis are their #1 target as they are the target of all of the sects and groups because the Salafis expose the innovated beliefs of these groups. They also make takfeer of each other and their own selves and some have even cut off their own hands for stealing! In a hadith: "Islam began as something strange, and it shall return to being something strange, so give glad tidings [ar. Tooba. This is a tree in Paradise. So the Prophet (saws) is giving the good news of Paradise to these strangers.] to the strangers." It was asked, "Who are… Read more »
What he taught was what the earliest generations taught and he was simply brining that people back to that since they had fell into Sufi principles such as blindly following a shaykh, calling upon the dead in their graves for assistance in difficulty and other than that. You will find nowhere in his teachings that you should oust the Muslim ruler and in fact fought under the banner of a Muslim ruler who was a known oppressor in line with the authentic principle that gives precedence to obeying the ruler. Why? Because of the disorder, chaos and loss of innocent lives that comes from toppling a regime with violent insurgency as we have seen with this Arab Spring that has done nothing but descend the Arab/Muslim lands into utter chaos. 1) The Salafis DO NOT declare Muslims to be disbelievers due to comitting a major sin thus spilling their blood… Read more »
ISIS has been menacing the Saudis Iraqi border and has bombed areas and blown up mosques in Saudi so how can people think that Saudi supports them is ridiculous. Imaam afet Saudi Imaam has been warning against the Khawaarij hundreds of years and they continue to do so. The Saudi royal family has over 15,000 members so could there be members who have participated in the ISIS manure storm? Perhaps. but it is not the M.O. of the whole kingdom. Re: the 73 sects comment. The Shia have sects within them such as the Alawite sect of Bashar al-Assad who worship their 12 imaams and believe in hidden knowledge. The sufis have many sects that most extreme of them saying that Allaah is within the creation. The 5% have the same belief as them. The Salafis expose and refute the beliefs of all the misguided sects in Islam WITH WORDS… Read more »
A.Human thank you for actually defending what the true salafi manhaj is, I get so frustrated when ignorant people want to claim that all these terrorist organisations are salafi when they are KHAWAARIJ. I'm so glad that you brang up this vital point as it is extremely frustrating when people speak about the religion without knowledge. The majority of muslims and non muslims have no idea how many sects are really running around all claiming islam nor do they have actual knowledge about the religion itself. Whilst it is true that there is definitely corruption amongst Saudi politicians and the royal family aswell, when it comes to the actual Islamic scholars based in Saudi, following the salafi methodology then they are certainly NOT corrupt. Just a few things the salafi scholars in Saudi have done: 1) spoken out against the Arab spring as they knew that it would cause nothing… Read more »
You will find nowhere in his teachings that you should oust the Muslim ruler and in fact fought under the banner of a Muslim ruler who was a known oppressor in line with the authentic principle that gives precedence to obeying the ruler. Why? Because of the disorder, chaos and loss of innocent lives that comes from toppling a regime with violent insurgency as we have seen with this Arab Spring that has done nothing but descend the Arab/Muslim lands into utter chaos. 1) The Salafis DO NOT declare Muslims to be disbelievers due to comitting a major sin thus spilling their blood 2) The Salafis do not declare the Muslim ruler to be a disbeliever and aim to kill him 3) Wahaabi is an invented term 4) ISIS are Khawaarij and not Salafi and their methodology is in complete opposition to the authentic sunnah particularly in their doctrine of… Read more »
ISIS has been menacing the Saudis Iraqi border and has bombed areas and blown up mosques in Saudi so how can people think that Saudi supports them is ridiculous. Imaam afet Saudi Imaam has been warning against the Khawaarij hundreds of years and they continue to do so. The Saudi royal family has over 15,000 members so could there be members who have participated in the ISIS manure storm? Perhaps. but it is not the M.O. of the whole kingdom. Re: the 73 sects comment. The Shia have sects within them such as the Alawite sect of Bashar al-Assad who worship their 12 imaams and believe in hidden knowledge. The sufis have many sects that most extreme of them saying that Allaah is within the creation. The 5% have the same belief as them. The Salafis expose and refute the beliefs of all the misguided sects in Islam WITH WORDS… Read more »

Lol there's plenty of proof that your Saudi leaders are supporting Isis. Is even main stream by now. The fact you condemn sufism which is generally the most pacifist branch of Islam shows you tend to favor a one way strict approach.

damning evidence…time to wake up blind goats

If the elite control ISIS why would they have them destroy their ancient Babylonian temples or worshiping sites?

Destroying of symbols and architecture of former generations is needed to break some of the links with the past, for the next generations to be born. When you controll what gets in the history (+books) and adjust the education, you can control the behaviour a little better. Because it is part of manipulation. Just a part, mind you. Educating our toddlers via on-screen-apps and icons, instead of teaching them grammar and words, is another way.

Because BabylonIan temples themselves are not evil? You sound like a creep by apparently sharing Isis view that these temples should be destroyed because they are evil. Yes, sacrificial rites were done there but that was thousands of years ago. But before entering into the duality of good and evil you must perceive that above all these temples, tablets, sculptures, idols, etc. Are world heritage made with mathematical precision, and an out most sense of beauty and inspiration.

They did absolutely nothing to destroy the ancient Babylonian sites already damaged by Polish troops in the invasion of Iraq.. same can not be told about other ancient sites like Jonas tomb or Palmirah. As for Babylonian spiritual haritage and the dark role Mesopotamia is to play in the last days please read Zechariah 5 : 5- 11 .. land of Shinar .. when the place is prepared ..

Because they probably have locations with reproductions, like Bohemian Grove, that fulfill their evil needs.

Thank you, VC, as always.

red pill, blue pill…

Excellent 🙂

I am not surprised, one day they will even accept that 9/11 was an inside job.

Curiouser and curiouser.

Here is the full PDF of the document obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information action.

The relevant passage relating to the ‘salafist principality’, i.e. ISIS, is point 8C on page 5.

The explanation of who the ‘supporting powers’ are, i.e. ‘The West’ (= US, Israel, France, UK, Australia), Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, is point 2C on page 3.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf

This is a fascinating read, though I'm a little confused now!
I thought Russia and China were with the opposition … are they gonna switch sides in the near future or something?
Forgive me if this is ignorance hahaha but I'm so sick of half-truths and downright lies I can barely trust anything presented to me anymore 🙁

Russia and China ? The world is on the brink of nuclear conflict. Basically major parties are currently doing absolutely nothing to alleviate the risk of destruction. Holy Spirit reveals the strike is not supposed to happen until the chosen ones are gone from the doomed planet we call home ..

I've always felt it was 50/50 with him! It the beginning, he seemed like a willing puppet. But lately, he's trying to be his own man but that programming seems to get in his way.

Just like Miley Cyrus is probably sick of those ugly costumes but she's been a willing participant to some degree in this nightmare climb to the top. She never needed Brittany Spears' management but she's stuck with it for now. And she never needed this type of crude management style. She does have talent. She's programmed to the hilt but I'm just wondering when she'll say stop, I wanna get off this sick merry-go-round.

Obama seems to be enjoying his ride because of the money he got to keep, over $900 million. But he too must be tired of being a puppet.

Again, I don't see how he you can accuse him of being a willing puppet but not equally question all US presidential roles. You are definitely making farfetched assumptions here. Being part of such an agenda certainly bypasses MONEY. Celebrities are willing puppets in the beginning. Presidents as well as royalty is a whole other board game.

I don't think there's any excuse for B.O. Nobody, NOBODY, gets into the Oval Office if he isn't 100% part of the plan, I just don't see how he could, not in this era. I'm reminded of the myriad people who, over the past 7 years, would have said how bad Bush was and that he was clearly part of the problem, but so often give B.O. a pass for some reason. His race? His promise of change? I don't know. But it needs to be admitted that there's simply no conceivable way, in the present running of things, that B.O. could really be just a decent joe shmoe of a guy who got elected and is just a poor unfortunate puppet of the Control. He, like his recent predecessors, and all others in positions of high power, are deliberately there, and for a reason. There's just no way the… Read more »

Exactly!

“Obama seems to be enjoying his ride because of the money he got to keep, over $900 million. But he too must be tired of being a puppet”

Actually, Obama and many other presidents around the world are there for reasons other than money. Although their rotten ego is sick of ambition, they are there to follow orders from their masters. Obama and the many of the presidents of the world are not the most powerful, they are just the face of the rulers in this world. Money is for the rulers (and should also be for the people) a tool, something they use to help mold and transform the world the way they want.

wpDiscuz