New WTC 7 Video Posted on YouTube (video)


The International Center for 9/11 Studies has posted a new video on YouTube. The footage was filmed by a news crew from a local NYC television station, and was received from NIST under the Freedom of Information Act.

Listen to the reporter’s comments…



  1. If you go the the 2:58 mark of the video, you can see windows popping out of the building. It was slowly imploding. There was nothing controlled about the demolition of that building.

  2. There is definitely laughter in the background around the 1:25 mark. Maybe it was a camera man or someone else on the news crew. But, it certainly doesn't seem normal to be yukking it up in that situation.

  3. I think its about time that VC does an article about the "truth" about Al Quaeda and Osamas so called links with the bush family. Otherwise can any one of u guys give me a link which writes about the truth abt the Al Quaeda and Osama?

  4. wtf is this .. the American Government make you wonder what are they involved in ? to do this to thier own country .. what are they gaining ?.. hey lets blow up one of our greatest buildings then blame iraq . so we can go and get all thier oil which is worth more the than the WTC ?… power money greed.. for the sake of lives what a shame .. the root of money is evil ??.. naaa the love of money is the root of all evil .. thos video proves that it was pure inside job and its sickening to know thats the truth !!1

  5. in the beggining he says a couple things that are really subtle. he says if youve never been to war like ive never been to war this is what it looks like suggesting the hysteria that this event was meant to ensue so that even every day americans would feel like ground zero was in fact a war zone at that moment. he then says im not sure where we are, we dont know what buldings these are but they are obviously on fire. why would buildings that werent hit by the planes randomly be on fire and have windows blown out OR BE DAMAGED IN ANY WAY, unless they were in a direct line of fire from the twin towers. then at the end is the most important peice. he says, this mustve been ground zero where the thing exploded. even this guy knows instinctively that the damage to those vehicles was caused by an explosion, they were completely obliterated by some kind of massive amount of energy and they were clearly burned from the inside out. the only thing that wouldve happened to those vehicles short of an explosion would be some damage to the upper portion of the vehicles from falling debris, random fire running rampant across the street would not be destroying them from the inside out "burning them to bare metal" as the reporter had said

  6. There is too much evil in this world. Just too much.

    I mean I can't imagine what more evidence needs to be presented. If this video is true then there is no way a PLANE did this kind of damage. How does a plane blow up and burn those cars? Why in 1:24-1:26 are all those windows perfectly intact and everything below it is trashed,

    God bless that poor reporter. I bet they put the muzzel on him so tight…

    • "how does a plane blow up and burn those cars?"

      I was about to reply that the impact of the planes hitting effected the ground too…by glass flying down, parts of the building or plane going down. But then I realized that doesn't add up….since the planes went IN, wouldn't the debris kinda go in with it? I'm no expert…..

  7. i saw a youtube video that shows smaller explosions doing down the corner of the first tower after the plane hit and also shows that something was under the plane when shwing it in slow motion, before impact. And it said that a surviving firemen said that he could hear explosions on the bottom floors

    • Exactly. More went on that day then was reported, and probably impossible to fully report.. However, instead of the media acknowledging all of the phenomenon they were not able to report on, they simple concluded that Osama Bin Laden did it, and moved things along to Gulf War II.

  8. In the very beginning of the video, the camera reads T*R 16:34:42:12??? Hidden message? Lets take a look. If you respect the order of the numbers, reading each passage in order in respect to T*R which could it possibly mean *Transmit & *Receive 16:34 or 4:34,42,12 ???

    Just food for thought read this…

    John 4:34 says…

    Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.


    "My food," said Jesus, "is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work.

    FURTHER MORE in depth

    My meat … – Jesus here explains what he said in John 4:32. His great object – the great design of his life – was to do the will of God. He came to that place weary and thirsty, and at the usual time of meals, probably hungry; yet an opportunity of doing good presented itself, and he forgot his fatigue and hunger, and found comfort and joy in doing good – in seeking to save a soul. This one great object absorbed all his powers, and made him forget his weariness and the wants of nature. The mind may be so absorbed in doing the will of God as to forget all other things. Intent on this, we may rise above fatigue, and hardship, and want, and bear all with pleasure in seeing the work of God advance. See Job 23:12; "I have esteemed the words of his mouth more than my necesary food." We may learn, also, that the main business of life is not to avoid fatigue or to seek the supply of our temporal wants, but to do the will of God. The mere supply of our temporal necessities, though most people make it an object of their chief solicitude, is a small consideration in the sight of him who has just views of the great design of human life.

    The will of him that sent me – The will

    now John 4:42 (New International Version)

    42They said to the woman, "We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world."

    And now for the last passage we go to Acts 4:12 where its says:

    "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."


    Also could be in direct relation to America's youth, who are being mislead by the mass media as in Tim 4:12 it says: "Don't let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity."

    Read more here…(fully explaination)

    Let no man despise thy youth – That is, do not act in such a manner that any shall despise you on account of your youth. Act as becomes a minister of the gospel in all things, and in such a way that people will respect you as such, though you are young. It is clear from this that Timothy was then a young man, but his exact age there is no means of determining. It is implied here:

    (1) that there was danger that, by the levity and indiscretion to which youth are so much exposed, the ministry might be regarded with contempt; and,

    (2) that it was possible that his deportment should be so grave, serious, and every way appropriate, that the ministry would not be blamed, but honored. The "way" in which Timothy was to live so that the ministry would not be despised on account of his youth, the apostle proceeds immediately to specify.

    But be thou an example of the believers – One of the constant duties of a minister of the gospel, no matter what his age. A minister should so live, that if all his people should closely follow his example, their salvation would be secure, and they would make the highest possible attainments in piety. On the meaning of the word rendered "example," see the notes on Philippians 3:17; 1 Thessalonians 1:7.

    In word – In "speech," that is, your manner of conversation. This does not refer to his "public teaching" – in which he could not probably be an "example" to them – but to his usual and familiar conversation.

    In conversation – In general deportment. See this word explained in the notes on Philippians 1:27.

    In charity – Love to the brethren, and to all; see notes on 1 Corinthians 13.

    In spirit – In the government of your passions, and in a mild, meek, forgiving disposition.

    In faith – At all times, and in all trials show to believers by your example, how they ought to maintain unshaken confidence in God.

    In purity – In chasteness of life; see 1 Timothy 5:2. There should be nothing in your contact with the other sex that would give rise to scandal. The papists, with great impropriety, understand this as enjoining celibacy – as if there could be no "purity" in that holy relation which God appointed in Eden, and which he has declared to "be honorable in all" Hebrews 13:4, and which he has made so essential to the wellbeing of mankind. If the apostle had wished to produce the highest possible degree of corruption in the church, he would have enjoined the celibacy of the clergy and the celibacy of an indefinite number of nuns and monks. There are no other institutions on the earth which have done so much to corrupt the chastity of the race, as those which have grown out of the doctrine that celibacy is more honorable than marriage.

    So there it is…take what you want but it's all there in truth what is truly going on.

    • Yep. There are signs and symbols written out through the ages. Numbers or Numerology, hold the keys to a lot of them. It is not a coincidence that you picked up on them… However, I am sure they weren't intentional from the reporters standpoint, but to you the viewer, the message was delivered from higher forces the same.

  9. For me all I can say is this: I can believe that 9/11 was an inside job done by the illuminati. If they supposedly control everything, why not hold them responsible? Makes sense. As far as how they carried out the actual attack….I don't believe bombs were strategically placed based in other buildings solely on this footage above….think about it guys.

    When the Twin Towers collapsed straight to the ground….don't you think the surrounding buildings FOUNDATIONS were rocked?

    I believe illuminati, masons, govt. knew about the planes….not so convinced about bombs.

    • One of the hijackers did tell the passengers that there was a bomb on board. The way both of the towers fell I could beleive explosives were placed. The second tower the damage wasn't as bad as the first and it still collasped. I consider that to be strange. Even if the pressure from the first tower caused the 2nd one to fall, I am not an expert but one would think they'd fall together, within seconds, or 1 – 2 minutes at the most.

    • Bella, scroll up a little bit and watch those documentaries I listed. If you want to know the truth it will tell you all you need to know. Many architectural workers claim it collapsed as if it was a controlled demolition. Another key fact is that 2 weeks before 9/11 the usual inspection where bomb sniffing dogs come in to inspect was called off. Who called it off? Jeb Bush, George Bushes brother…….and the list goes on and on

      • hey sPEKtrall…..

        i watched "loose change" after I made my first post.

        it looked like bombs exploded at the bottom of the towers b4 they fell….but could it have been gas lines exploding? that's what some seem to think. after viewing that, the whole bomb theory makes more sense because of where the explosions took place…..not sure if i'm being clear, but if it were gas lines exploding, i would think they would be doing so closer to where the planes hit, not at the base of the towers.

        it did look like controlled demolitions….which makes everything even more sadly unbelievable.

        kinda tough to watch, turns my stomach. but whoever was truly behind it will have to answer to God for what they have done.

  10. Look….to anyone here who does their own research knows 9/11 was an inside job.

    to you skeptics I got documentaries that people purchased and uploaded to youtube that have had hundreds of millions of views and most get thumbs up.

    "Loose Change 2nd Edition"

    "9/11 Road To Tyranny"

    "9/11 The Great Illusion"

    "9/11 Chronicles Truth Rising"

    Those are just to name a few……I would say the best 2 out of that selection are the 3rd and 4th choice. So before you call me a kook just check them out…please this is important…the 3rd choice talks about the illuminati and the reason behind 9/11. SO please folks check it out. Its not that im gullable its just the facts and that the evidence is damning. You must understand that the Illuminati control and filter the corporate media so they do lie and whitewash the truth. The same elements who carried out the attacks own the media

  11. What this video is showing (presumably) is that their was explosions within the bottom floors of the WTC.

    If a the buildings went down because a plane crashed into them, Why are all the top windows still in tact and theirs a fire on the lower floors!

    I remember a few days ago, youtube was acting very strangely and I kept getting this weird error message everytime I tried to log on. My husband and I joked that someone must have tried to upload some serious s**t on to youtube and the feds shut it down!!!!!!

    YIKES! If this video is real then it proves that there is something more to how the towers went down then what we've been told. One theory i heard is that there were explosives inside of the building that went off. This video gives evidence to support that theory.

  12. 9/11 was conducted by the United States so the Illuminati, Freemasons and Satan's followers can drive the world into World War III. This was blatantly done to start a war in the Middle East, to get Saddam out of power and give Iran the freedom to destroy Israel. The economy has suffered greatly since then, there's this paranoia over our weak national borders…the only way to keep track of everyone is to get a microchip implanted under your skin. Hence, you'll be a part of a system where Satan will be able to control you.

    • Ugh, microchipping. I wouldn't even do that to my dog.

      But that sounds to me like "the mark of the beast" that God warns us about in the end times.

      Everyone needs to turn to Jesus as their Savior….the time is near.

  13. Does this movie stink of do I want it to stink?….I get an "actor" kinda feeling watching this. 1 news crew that's it? all that rouble and debry and the guy is as clean hospital operating room? If what happened in 2001 wasn't so terrible I would laugh at this piece of film. i'm about 99% leaning in the piece of "#@$ direction right now.

  14. I watched this doc on C4 the other day about Tanya Haides, a woman who faked being a survivor. And oh my days what a b***h. Who the hell would use a tradgedy like this to create a hoax just to get the spot light attention?

    • And the truth is that this is just a preview of what is to come. These material things that we hold soooo dear will soon pass, and so will these bodies, so…GET YOUR SOULS RIGHT, BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONLY THINGS THAT WILL LAST AND BE JUDGED!!

    • Listen to the reporter.. He talks about windows being blown inward, and that place where the bus was completely melted along with the cars, as being ground zero, meaning all the destruction by WORLD TRADE CENTER 7, at least at the front of the building was cause by a bomb, or something of massive heat.. Especially for cars and the street to be singed, with most of them still not burning or on fire only a few hours later.

      Please remember that WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 was on the opposite end of the Twin Towers, and stood for about 7 hours after 1 & 2 collapsed, before coming down in its own footprint. This looks like it was taped after the towers collapsed.

  15. I can't see the video, but I was watching the 9-11 conspiracy on history channel. It was quite humorous. They had CT's who stated their theories then the other side presented the facts. However they claimed CT's beleive : the phone calls made on the plane was fake, that the hijackers were CIA agents,not terriost and that no plane that hit the pentagon. There were a few more LOWSEY theories that I can't remember at this time….They actually went through the trouble presenting facts, scientist & professionals speaking on the subject refuting these claims..and I am sitting in front of the TV thinking what CT's did they speak with?? who thinks that??? I know loses change was one, and they agreed to make changes to their documentary, however their film crew choose to continue to make money. Alex Jones I think his name is he had some outlandish theories as well. I learned a few things about him. When the doc mentioned that " loose change" would make changes and the film crew would to press foward because they are making money, they then showed Alex moving foward with his agenda as well. Due to listening to his outlandish theories, and remembering thats where I watched a justin Beiber illuminati video that was so unconvincing I get the impression he is out for money. I just though i'd mention them clearing the air as far as CT's. It was so fake and stupid. I'm like did the illuminati make this….knowing they did before the show began but damn this one was just low. No hijackers on the plane, phone call were fake, no plane at the pentagon…on the other side some of the ones refuting claims in my opinion was confirming what I beleive. I beleive 9-11 was an inside job but that crap they was talking gheesh. Bush and Osama may be enemies but I would say they are enemies on the same side, or Bush used Osama for our countries own personal gain. Another doc mentioned Bin Laden carried out, finianced missions for anyone with a plan he liked. An american muslin came to him with the 9-11 plan hmmmmmmm who was this so called american terriost muslim. I'm not even sure if it was an terriost, now thats where I would place the CIA agent. Another thing that was stated was that Bin Laden was mad because Sadamm chosse to use American Army forces to assist in "some" situation and took it out on America. I can't see how that would make him made at our country but Okay!

    • I have seen that documentary on the history channel and its all a bunch of disinfo garbage. They count on the publics ignorance towards science to manipulate people and the term "expert" should acctualy be "paid off disinfo shill" in this case. That whole conspiracy theory documentary on history channel is a cover up and they only covered one theory video. I have seen literally about a dozen and that documentary on the history channel fails to cover allot of issues. They didnt cover the fact that the Bushes and Bin Ladens were friends and made frequent visits or that Bin Laden was flown into a hospital in the U.S when he had kidney problems. They didnt mention that Bin Laden was a CIA asset that went by the code name Tim Osman. Look friend please dont be deceived by the DISINFO lies on history channel. Fact of the matter is that it was ultimately the illuminati responsible for the attacks and they will release any kind of hit disinfo piece there is to cover their ass. The Corporate Media is controlled by the same elements who carried out the attacks…….I could sit here and preach, but ultimately what you believe is what you believe. Mujhadeen that later transformed into the taliban and alqueda was founded by the CIA and is funded by the CIA. If you think its crazy im sorry, but you can look it up…..go to youtube and search for Alex Jones documentaries that are well documented like, "Fall of the Republic" or "The Obama Deception" or "9/11 Chronicles, Truth Rising"

      • His documentaries have been viewed combined well over 500,000 million times and allot of them get thumbs up and allot of people claim them as "wake up calls". just watch them. I mean what do you got to loose? They must have some credibility right considering that the amount of views and thumbs up they have

      • I caught this documentary about halfway through. Did I miss the part where they addressed the "conspiracy theories" surrounding WTC 7? Or did they ignore that all together?

      • They didn't mention wtc7 on it. Israelis were caught posing as arabians and pulled over in a van packed full of explosives. Look it up on you tube and listed to the police radios and they were headed to park near wtc 7 to make it look like it wasn't a controlled demolition. but got lost so they then went to plan b and park by gw bridge.

    • Sorry i read this and just wanted to say that i feel the history channel conspiracy was a stupid thing to base anything off of. the government and media are tied together so of course they would do everything to make u believe what they want.

      but plane not hitting the pentagon..its highly believable…just answer me this, did you ever see a plane hit the pentagon? what are the odds that the ONLY camera in the DC area to catch a video of that "plane" is a 5 slides that doesnt show you what hit the pentagon. Im not saying it was a missle….but until they release proof it was a plane i wont believe it

      • also, take 100 people who ignore where the pentagon was struck, make each one fly a simulator over washington, telling them to hit the pentagon. See how many go for the center of it…


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.