Symbolic Pics of the Week (08/06/11)

Aug 6th, 2011 | Category: Pics of the Month | 223 comments


There is definitely no danger of running out of these pics anytime soon. Tons of them appear in the media every week. Keep sending them in!

Singer So Hee photoshoot in Nylon Magazine. Yup, the good ol’ combination of one-eye and Mickey Mouse.

Same model and magazine.

Louis Vuitton ad Campaign

K-Pop group Super Junior on checkerboard pattern. The group was featured in this recent article.

Model Adel Jord.

Emily Browning, star of Sucker Punch (analyzed in this article)

Singaporean singer Kelly Poon who emerged from the singing competition Project SuperStar.

Hyuna’s logo looks like something some of you might be familiar with…

…the Masonic Square and Compass.

Lindsey Lohan in a role she was supposed to play as porn star Linda Lovelace

Hayley from Paramore posted this image on her blog. I could not find a more accurate and symbolically correct image depicting Monarch programming. (You might want to read the article entitled Paramore’s “Brick by Boring Brick”: A Song about Mind Control). The group apparently broke up by the way because the band did not agree with the “negative messages” Hayley was incorporating in her songs.

A photoshoot in French Vogue is currently causing  controversy in the media due to its sexualization of children. The photoshoot and its symbolism was covered by yours truly over 8 months ago. See the full article here.

I was still on semi-vacation this week so sorry again for the lack of substantial updates. Worry not, important articles are in the works and will be posted this week!

Tags:





COMMENTS

Please note that the comments are moderated and that all spam, insults, proselytizing and hate speech will be removed.

223 Comments to “Symbolic Pics of the Week (08/06/11)”

  1. cingisbelieving12 says:

    i loved paramore….when i found out that they had broken up i knew something happened but not to this extent…..

    here's an article: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1654829/paramore

    josh calls her a "a manufactured product of a major label" WOW!!!

    • Avid Gamer says:

      Hayley blogged that photo? Seriously? I wonder what message she's trying to get across /SARCASM. Disgusting.

    • Daniel says:

      I guess she "sold her soul" zand was programmed, but they weren't down with it… Deep, glad they didn't give in.

    • Godozo says:

      I thought there was something WIERD about Paramore, with its focus on Haylee. The Cosmo cover pushed my thoughts more along those lines (I can see her on Rolling Stone, but Cosmo?). The Blog Entry definitely nailed it for me.

    • Harry says:

      I remember the first time I heard the album Brand New Eyes, my brother was showing to me on the internet and we were previewing the songs. At the time I didn't know much of Paramore's music but really liked what I did know. The songs played, one after another and I recall thinking, wow this cannot be more blatant anti-christian sentiments. Basically every song contained hints of disatisfaction with christians or God, etc.

      Anyway later on I followed the band's music and listened to the bands earlier stuff. I also looked up info on the band. I was really surprised to read that the members all considered themselves christian and their music sometimes had that influence in it (e.g. their song Hallelujah).

      Not long after the band announced that it was splitting up. I read Josh's blog entry about what had happened and why, and this was his explanation: "Once again we hit the road and toured on our biggest record as a band… Hayley and Jeremy’s views started changing from what we all once believed in…. Once we finished touring on Riot, we came home for a break and started writing for Brand New Eyes. Hayley presented lyrics to us that were really negative and we didn’t agree with. For example, “the truth never set me free”, which contradicts what the Bible says in John 8:32 (“and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall sat you free”). We fought her about how her lyrics misrepresented our band and what we stood for, but in the end she got her way."

      It seems to me that during the tour, for whatever reason, maybe the dark music industry's influence, Hayley stopped considering herself a christian and then put her feelings of resentment into the lyrics. Anyway, regardless I'm still a big fan of the band, especially their early stuff (got all their albums). That's just my 2 cents on what happened to Hayley.

  2. Darrell The Truthsee says:

    These people so damn twisted. They really after our kids. I hope PETA has a field day with this Tiger skin rug.

  3. lu says:

    The french vougue thing is just plain disturbing. There's no other way to view it. How can u justify it

    • Sabrina says:

      This link is the conact list for French Vogue

      http://digital.condenastinternational.com/fr/pub-

      We should all raid their email inbox with letters of disgust and disapproval of their sexualization of children photoshoot so they Never do something like that again. We have to realize that, yes the media has certain wealth and power, HOWEVER the public will outnumber them and we must take a stand! We cannot let them “handle” us in the sense of accepting what they put out into the world. We might recognize their wrong and complain here, but what are we actually “doing” to prevent it? So please email thos devils at Vogue!

  4. dispose says:

    I wonder if a model/actress/singer ever say NO to the one eye thing. You can't stay blind forever, there's comes a point where you ask "wait who is this "cool"".

    • dispose says:

      Why not who.**

      • ShutterBeg says:

        What??

        LOL, I wish VC introduces a system where we can delete and re-post our message, so we can type at normal pace (it helps especially when we're one of the first ones to comment) :P

  5. ktx says:

    in regard of the amount of comments here…most seem to be in semi vacation too…

    can't wait to read tho…

  6. iheartwebbot says:

    that lindsey pic is disgusting!

    • Don Quijote says:

      I know! Seems like they're about to have a "gang bang" on her. That is so sick!

      • bast says:

        It's from Inferno about the life of Linda Lovelace. Linda said her husband had her gang banged by five men as her initiation into forced prostitution. So it's not really a sex kitten phototshoot

    • Smooch says:

      @ bast – Spot on. It is indeed from Inferno (which I am glad wasn't made…at least yet). The photographer is Tyler Shields and he has many, many disturbing – and non movie related – photo shoots with Lindsey and most of Hollywood. He is H-woods new photog "it" boy.

      As a photographer myself, I find it odd he has gotten so much exposure and success from the work he has done. It is actually quite sub par according to Hollywood's usual standards.

      • Cinrad says:

        Agreed – this is a really bad photo. There's the shadow between her and the men and the men themsleves. The light off the backboard and wall is really dull as is the bedspread, it should be more vibrant. Not enough of the men either and they are in shadow – not shadow as to suggest that there is something shadowy going on but shadow as in I am so hung over from last night's party and can't do my job properly. The man on the left is wearing blue under his jacket – should be black. She should have been closer to the men by about 2 inches and the photo taken from a lower angle.

        Maybe he had a pang of conscience at this shoot and felt disgusted by what he was doing?

    • Me says:

      A similar picture with Lara Stone for a Kelvin Kline ad was forbidden in Australia because even though it may allude to consensual group sex, it was seen as potentially promoting rape. So the argument. Something like this, cannot find the articles on this at the moment. While looking for it, I came across these pictures of her however http://www.stylebrity.co.uk/feature/6029/lara-sto
      She is a woman who "always raged against authorities" and "did the opposite to what she was told", so she said in an interview. However this does not keep her from treating herself so badly and expose herself like this. I am aware that they think that they are somehow thinking of themselves as free spirits, when they are really nothing more than enslaved to this oversexualised thinking. Sex sex sex sex as if there were nothing else in life. Most of them are also drug addicted, so there you go. She has also been to rehab. She reminds me of the Heidi Klum's Next Top Model contestants. What's interesting about those is that the latest winner just left Klum's father's model agency because she did not want to do like he wanted.

      • Harbie says:

        Wow!

        That picture of Lara Stone has nothing to do with modelling anymore.. It looks like it belongs in some sort of sm porn mag or something.. This is just disgusting!

      • ? says:

        That pic should have a warning: Not Safe For Work (NSFW).

      • sunrise says:

        @Me. The Girl left Heidi Klums Show because she aspires to be a "Professional Model" in french you say "Haute Couture" she wants2walk for Designers like Versace, Prade etc. Since Heidi doesnt work with those kind of Designers, she recognized that she wont be satisfied with that job4long. Thats why she quit. She is basically staying in the circle, if you know what I mean.

      • shev says:

        wow bad bob job

    • Cruel World says:

      its scary as well . those guys are like her handlers and she ,their slave . sad :(

    • shev says:

      of all the pictures the lindsay lohan one was the most disturbing to me

  7. SarabT says:

    i was actually eager to see this week's pictures, mainly because i was hoping to see this last picture in there, it pretty much brings back the days when willow smith released her first music video, severe symbolism + sexuality for children seems to be the new hit, it pretty much sickens me :

  8. bast says:

    Zac and Josh exit statement on why they left Paramore, this part really struck me.

    Once we finished touring on Riot, we came home for a break and started writing for Brand New Eyes. Hayley presented lyrics to us that were really negative and we didn’t agree with. For example, “the truth never set me free”, which contradicts what the Bible says in John 8:32 (“and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall sat you free”). We fought her about how her lyrics misrepresented our band and what we stood for, but in the end she got her way

  9. AwakenedOne says:

    It's sad, most people can not see the signs even though they come on almost every music video. A K-Pop fan who is an American, who is also..an aquantince-friend of sorts. He tries not to listen to me of my rants about it, of course I only try to tell him these signs appear in almost every video across the world and yet he ignores me still. I shall stay Vigilant and continue my rants, whether he hates it or not.

    • Oye Vey says:

      Amen amen, people tell me I shouldn't focus on this stuff but it's not like i'm obsessing. It's very important (obviously) to seek the truths behind these symbols/point them out to others.

      • AwakenedOne says:

        Not to be disgusting, but that same person feels attractions to dragons and would look at them. Oh, and I found some other news. Japan seems to allow 12 year olds to look + play eroge (erotic) games.

  10. Rebecca says:

    The Lindsay Lohan pic made me recoil in horror. I can't believe something like that could even be put out there in a mainstream publication. Even worse is the last image… I want to cry for that little girl. She looks robbed of her innocence, incredibly empty, and sad. Who in their right mind would dress and pose a child like that?

    • Jeff S says:

      I'm going to just go ahead and assume her mother is one of those pageant moms. And her dad, well, her dad almost assuredly likes touching kids, including his own.

  11. ShutterBeg says:

    Amazing, refreshing & disturbing pics…Enjoy your vacation bro!

  12. Penny says:

    Tyler Shields is a scum bag. His themes for photo shoots are tired in general and badly executed.

    This photograph though, has a context. It was taken to promote the movie "Inferno" which is supposed to be a movie about "Linda Lovelace" and how she got in the pornographic industry.

    Nonetheless it is disturbing.

    As for the rest of the pictures, not much to comment. Same old.

    For the last one though, I think the bigger "issue" is the fact that when people look at those pictures they think "sexuality". Even though the girls are made up, I look at them and I don't think anything sexual whatsoever. I think "old", "mature" "plastic" "serious" "cliche" "materialistic" but never does anything sexual comes to my mind.

    I think it's like seeing a relative naked…I'm sorry, just not the kind of thing that will ever turn me on. Or a child without a top running on the beach.

    In my opinion there is definitely something to be said about the reaction most people have had to the pictures, more than about the pictures themselves.

    I guess the programming has been successful for them…

    • ShutterBeg says:

      Interesting note Penny and I think you may have struck a hornet's nest here.

      When I see that child in that picture, in addition to your description, two more words "pity" and "ricoculous" (ridiculous+cocky) spring to my mind.

      The issue is that through media, sheeple's perceptions, emotions, likes and dislikes are constantly being worked upon to be changed in order to include things which would have been considered gross at one point of time. I feel there is a deliberate effort behind this and the aim is to make "immorality" widespread enough to be accepted as something normal so that it is integrated seamlessly into the society.

      I so tend to think that there may exist a link between those who think casting children in un-childlike poses for film shoots is "OK", those who benefit from "child porn", those who are fighting legal battles to lower the age of consensual sex and those who think animal sex is "normal" and will "prove" that the animals too are "enjoying" it

      After all, haven't "they" already and very successfully advocated for a category which has found prominent acceptance and won a string of legalizations of late.

      If I have my way, I will open a rehab and prove that some things which ought to be corrected can actually be corrected and cured. At least give it a chance! It will be a slap in the face of those who are hell bent on "proving" that immorality is moral and unnatural is natural…Peace.

      • Penny says:

        I agree with both of you! Indeed, people are told when to be "outraged" or "excited" or agree about something and sadly, it seems like this is working successfully for a lot of people.

        I stay away from the news, either political or "pop culture" news but whenever I do happen to read any of it, I notice there are so many things that don't add up, yet nobody seems to call it out and if someone happens to do so, it's like "Oh, you're reading too much into it", "you're too deep" or "you're a conspiracy theorist" at best! Ha :P / Seriously?. Or I will hear from friends how AWESOME something is, like a game, a movie, etc, then whenever I get to it is like, Really? And whenever I ask them to elaborate on why they like it, they are like, i don't know, it's cool, isnt it? But they don't know why. Just because.

        There are a lot of standards changing. Just to mention something I recently noticed: While I was in line at the grocery store I saw one of those "gossip magazines" and it said that the girls on that 16 and pregnant show are making A LOT of money. And my first thought was…OK. So here I am, paying my way through school, doing my best to better myself in all different areas. But what this is telling me, is that in today's world if what you want is at least financial success, this is the easies way to get it. This is what most people want to see…Damn…

        Then again, one realizes that to better one's self and chose to be who one truly is, is done for one's satisfaction, not for anything else. But still.

        I also tried out the "beats" by Dre. headphones and although I am not a sound engineer, I could tell you those things were HORRIBLE. Audio and design wise…yet, people are buying them like it's a must have.

        I still have faith that the pendulum will eventually swing to the other side and it will all be worth it.

    • Smooch says:

      Interestingly Tyler Shields is massively adored despite being a pretty lame photographer. Have to agree (and stated in an above reply) his work is technically pretty bleh yet he enjoys massive success in a town which demands perfection.

      • Godozo says:

        Which leads to this question: Are they preparing us for a shift? From perfection to "whatever makes it?" A dropoff in standards, with the audience following along blind?

        Maybe they're following Video games, which have yet to hit Hollywood perfection on a regular basis.

    • schnucki says:

      offcourse you and I would never get turned on by pictures like this one or by children in swinsuits at the beach! and i hope most of the people visiting this site either would do that!!

      but i dont want to know how many sick people out there, have touched themselves with one hand and holding with the other hand this magazin with this lil girl in those outifts.

      really dsiturbing

      ugh

    • jb says:

      So I see that society has succeeded in making you NUMB to those types of images. You should feel horror and disgust. What if that was your daughter?

  13. WhoSaves=Yahweh says:

    can somebody search through the bible and tell me when does satan deliver salvation..because these people obviously are oblivious to their fate written very conspicuous.

    Want to inquire who does?Read my name!

    • vittoria-blue says:

      Amen!

    • o brien says:

      "These people", ie Luciferians, mind controlled puppets, Satanists, soulless drones, call them what you will, have no interest in Salvation. To explain their doctrine most simply; What if when you die, you just… die. There is nothing else. So, this "life" is all you get, in order to get everything out of it, be prepared to do anything. Including sell your soul to the master of the earthly domain. Who, if you read the bible, is Lucifer. He fell to Earth.

      They don't care. They seek power, they don't seek truth.

    • Andy says:

      >Implying the bible was written by God.

  14. Say No To NWO says:

    The Lindsey Lohan one….is just terrible and sickning.

    However, I am glad Paramore broke up. They needed to stop creating those god-awful music videos and songs. The Twilight movies got a lot of air-headed 15 year olds to follow that band… get them hooked on Monarch-themed messages when they're young.

    • paramore didnt break up, they have a new song, and a new album available for release early 2012

    • Jam says:

      I'm not sure where Paramore got their band name, but I was curious and looked up what a 'paramore' was…a paramour (different spelling) is an illicit lover. Aptly named?? Hmmm, I wonder who they love…

      Great job VC getting the scoop on things it take network media 8 months to latch onto.

  15. Yemeth says:

    Its funny seeing just how international this Mafia-esque stuff is. It wont stop till it controls everything.

  16. Para no more says:

    I only saw the owl standing on that guy's shoulder on the second look… freaky.

  17. yo says:

    Adel Jord,

    one eye

    666

    Owl

    Vigilant Citizen doesn't bring us the mickey mouse shit, this is the real deal.

  18. SwissMiss says:

    Ok, these are all run of the mill by now, but wtf is up with that Lindsey Lohan picture? What exactly were they trying to depict with that?!

    Also, the last one is absolutely horrifying…

  19. Steph says:

    Thankeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!

  20. XFJ says:

    These images just get worse and worse—it proves just how evil and twisted this world has become.

  21. YoungPhelps says:

    For more kpop symbolism go on facebook and check out: Kpop Star Illuminati

  22. Mert says:

    Thank you VC! The same symbolism being overwhelmed -everywhere in the world-.

    For the young Vogue model out there… I was like "Hey aren't you a little late to cause a controversy out of this girl".

  23. Matthew says:

    Here we go again!

    All those models in the Louis Vuitton ads look like they are made out of the same plastic as the handbags they are advertising!

    Thanks VC for another great article. :)

  24. moribundystopia says:

    it seems that the one eye symbolism has taken root as a fad and is now akin to internet memes such as planking and the latest owling craze, as many start to post images of their single eye or trendy poses with the 666 hand gesture in their facebook profiles and other social networks. it seems that the mass media is succeeding in its agenda to desensitise and indoctrinate the masses. it seems that we're in a very sorry state…

  25. Candle of the Meteor says:

    Wow, I am getting sick of this! Can we organize an organization that would be ready to fight against the system in a time of crisis? I am afraid of them closing their grip and restricting the internet (which is really our last defence).

  26. Pest says:

    The Lindsey Lohan pic and the last picture are sickening, evil and disgusting!

    These picture were made for the purpose to attract attention in any form! And there is something wrong with people that find these pictures even slightly "cool" and "hot"! It promotes slavery, objectification, sexism and (child)pornography!

  27. JP says:

    That pic from Haley is literally JAW DROPPING. You have to figure some of these folks are being directed for these poses but that art work is maddening to say the least.

  28. namedoesnotmatter says:

    Lindsey lohan looks a lot like Micheal jackson in that pic.

  29. vittoria-blue says:

    I'm sick and tired of seeing Lindsay L. She's a walking-talking-disaster. Isn't the world saturated?

    Now, french vogue should be set on fire! Not only because they're promoting child pornography, but because they're "indirectly" supporting animal cruelty. I wonder where her parents are? Cashing in I suppose.

  30. b says:

    Good on the rest of the Paramore band…

  31. MoonLizard says:

    The Emily Browning one is interesting because she is in an very recent Australian film entitled "Sleeping Beauty" which is a brave attempt at exposing the world of sexual slavery and monarch programming (see the trailer on Youtube). Of course, this film is yet to be released in the United States, despite it's acceptance in Cannes.

    And on another note, I've been noticing an alarming number of "friends" on my Facebook posting pictures of themselves with that 3-finger ring around one eye. Mind you, I'm only in my late teens and they are as well. Do they even know what they are trying to represent? Do they have they slightest f**king idea? Sheople.

    • desrt100 says:

      let me sum this up if this how you feel ugh,disgusted,this is really sicking,*sigh* thats all i have to say its my stomach churns too i wish i could vomit in all they're faces

  32. Vigilant Girl says:

    I thought I was the was the only one who did not see the photo shoot with the little girl as sexual. Seriously the words used to describe the shoot on various news channels have been disgusting. I personally see this as a way to sexualize girls even more. In every shot she is covered. I have seen little girls dressing up in their mom's clothes looking like the above photo. The girls face is every shot is innocent. It's the view of the adults and 'specialists' that i'm concerned about. In a part of the country I live in, many natives are known to wear little clothes. Yet,when a non native where's anything short- and I mean short as in below the knee, the go crazy-obsessed with legs! It's crazy and contradicts their own behavior. My friend who visited had to spend the rest of her holiday in her pajama pants. I hope my example makes sense

    • Mimi says:

      I can't believe what I just read. It's people like you who make the elite smile. You are a perfect example of what they want everyone to believe. They are slowly desentisizing society. America is in a huge moral decline.

      Perhaps 10 years ago, our society will be so morally deprived that it will be okay to let 8 year olds have sex since they want you to believe "it's natural, so anyone can do it."

      Things like this make me want to leave America. This place is no longer an "American Dream." More like an American Nightmare.

      • Mimi says:

        *I meant 10 years FROM NOW

      • Vigilant Girl says:

        well Mimi and Pest

        Of course you two would know what porn looks like. I don't. I have never looked at porn in my life. As a young woman who works with children, all I see is parents/adults who spoil the minds of thier children by letting them do and watch things that aren't good. If you watch porn, or dress like a ho, don't talk when your child does it. If you watch bad tv, or sexualized ad's/show's etc, its your fault when your son runs up to your guests and trys to bite thier butt or whatever(happened to me) I don't know what child pornography looks like but this world is twisted. I was googling pregnant women and could not believe people like certain things as pregnant porn. I'm not american btw. The whole world is declining anyways. Why do children play 'nurse' as an excuse to play with each others bodies? It's not exploration to me, it's the facts they have seen something sexy on tv, or parents have not locked the door when getting busy amongst other reasons. So you two shut your mouths and open your eyes. Everyone has basically made this girl a porn star already. Shame on you all. Describing her body like you would a slut/whore. Poisoned minds. children cant even eat ice cream without some people seeing sex. Perverse

      • Vigilant Language says:

        Actually Vigilant Girl makes a good point which deserves thinking about carefully.

        Dressing children as adults makes them look like children (dressed as adults). In fact in many ways dressing children as adults makes them look even MORE like children, if that makes any sense.

        When the mainstream media gets hysterical about the 'sexualization of children' there is in fact a subtle insinuation (or potential insinuation) contained within that message: that children CAN be made to look sexually alluring in the same way that adults obviously can.

        You *could* argue that this is simply a matter of 'accidentally ambiguous language'. And I'm sure in many cases it is. It's the kind of phrase that many concerned people/ parents will use in a conversation about this subject and it doesn't mean they are personally trying to promote the idea that children can be made to look sexually attractive in the same way adults can. Or that they are or can be sexually attracted to children themselves. Yet the phrase does carry that implication nevertheless.

        If the language used is ambiguous and potentially misleading then it needs to be thought about and used carefully …. unfortunately this is not so easy when there is so much outrage and hysteria (which is understandable of course) surrounding this issue.

        I guess the problem with this kind of ambiguous (and unexamined) language is that it may lead to the following kind of 'logic' occurring in the public's collective subconscious. Obviously I've simplified it in the following example. But try to imagine the following questions floating around the public's collective subconscious over a period of, say, a decade. A decade where there are lots more examples of children being used in adult themed fashion shoots and music videos etc. (and with all the accompanying media hysteria).

        Are children sexy? No…… Are you sure? Yes of course I'm sure! ……. Has this child featured in this fashion shoot been sexualized? Yes……… Are children sexy? Well, sometimes they are made to look sexy……. Has this child featured in this pop video been sexualized? Yes………. Are children sexy? Sometimes they look sexy, yes. ………. Are children sexy? Yes, sometimes…… Are children sexy? Yes.

        It's a very disturbing path of 'logic' I admit. Whether or not it actually reflects the way things are heading I think it is still valid if only as a cautionary scenario. Public attitudes have always changed and always been steered in one direction or another.

        We've seen over the last 50 years the glorification of violence, war via movies ….. we've seen being an uneducated idiot defined as 'cool' via music …… vacant and shallow consumerism and narcissism is something to aspire to thanks to TV shows etc etc.

        And I've noticed a similar trend in the way the media seems to be defining grown up pop stars (Rihanna, Spears, Aguilera etc) as 'sexy' when they are really just tacky and demeaning.

        You often see headlines like "Parents Outraged by Rihanna's Latest Sexy Video"

        What they *should* say is "Parents Outraged by Rihanna's Latest Tacky and Demeaning-to-Women Video"

        This might seem pedantic but the distinction is important when you think about it.

        Whether or not those controlling the mass media and fashion/entertainment industry are *deliberately* trying to steer society in this kind of direction is up for debate…. it's a matter of trust I guess….

        ********

        Another fantastic example of the power of ambiguous language which this made me think of is when the media and the public talk about "the collapse of the Twin Towers…."

        Whatever anyone's take on 9/11 is, the undeniable observation as recorded by multiple cameras on the day is that the towers explosively disintegrated and were turned to dust and rubble which *then* collapsed down to the ground in great billowing clouds of dust and raining chunks of debris.

        Or to really drive the point home: they didn't collapse to dust and rubble…. they turned to dust and rubble which *then* collapsed. Big difference.

        This is not a theory or explanation – this is merely an (accurate) observation. (Deduce what you like from it).

        And so because the official story/ mass media described (and thus defined) the destruction of the twin towers as a 'collapse' from about the afternoon of 9/11 onwards everyone started to repeat that description too. Every one talked about (and today STILL talk about the 'collapse' of the twin towers).

        This also meant that the investigation only looked for the cause of the so called 'collapse'. Or to be even more accurate they only looked as far as the *initiation* of a collapse.

        Had the destruction been more accurately described (and thus defined) as an explosive disintegration followed by immediate collapse of debris then everyone would have naturally started looking for what on earth could have caused the explosive disintegration and subsequent collapses of every floor of two enormous buildings!

        And so if you rewind time and go back to the day of 9/11 and imagine the more accurate description being more widely used right from the start, the entire event might have taken on a very different meaning and the direction of any subsequent investigation would certainly have been radically different. How could it not? And one might even suggest that the last ten years of illegal wars, genocide, racism, erosion of rights and liberties etc etc might never have happened.

        I guess the 'moral of the story' is that language is very powerful. Handle it with respect and care. :)

      • -_- says:

        good thing I don't live in america, though its starting to get worldwide anyway

    • Pest says:

      Would you find a photo of a woman not pornographic if she wears a dress and is rubbing her nipples and touching her crotch?

      Just because someone wears clothes or covers the private parts with something doesn't mean it is not pornographic!

      I have seen so many porny pictures where the person wore clothes and I have seen a lot of tastefull photos with a person completely naked.

      It depends on poses, symbols, messages, face expressions etc, to make a picture look a certain way! There are even certain fetishes for certain clothes(Uniforms, latex, high heels, lingerie, dresses, etc). Just look at the Lindsey Lohan pic, everyone wears clothes, but it still represents Porn! What I see in that picture is""Look guys! I'm a pice of meat! Get me!!!".

      The Vogue girl has a typical pin up woman pose, with High heels + she is wearing clothes normally adults wear + tons of jewelery. It's like she got set up to make all the pedos horny. A child shouldn't wear such clothes!!!

      • Vigilant Girl says:

        well Mimi and Pest

        Of course you two would know what porn looks

        like. I don’t. I have never looked at porn in my life.

        As a young woman who works with children, all I

        see is parents/adults who spoil the minds of thier

        children by letting them do and watch things that aren’t good. If you watch porn, or dress like a ho,

        don’t talk when your child does it. If you watch bad

        tv, or sexualized ad’s/show’s etc, its your fault

        when your son runs up to your guests and trys to

        bite thier butt or whatever(happened to me) I don’t

        know what child pornography looks like but this world is twisted. I was googling pregnant women

        and could not believe people like certain things as

        pregnant porn. I’m not american btw. The whole

        world is declining anyways. Why do children play

        ‘nurse’ as an excuse to play with each others

        bodies? It’s not exploration to me, it’s the facts they have seen something sexy on tv, or parents have

        not locked the door when getting busy amongst

        other reasons. So you two shut your mouths and

        open your eyes. Everyone has basically made this

        girl a porn star already. Shame on you all.

        Describing her body like you would a slut/whore. Poisoned minds. children cant even eat ice cream

        without some people seeing sex. Perverse

    • schnucki says:

      unfortunately vigilant girl,

      there are too many sick people out there that will def "enjoy" watching this picture of this lil girl, in a very perverse way.

      Let me asking you something, if you had children, would you let your daughter pose and be exposed in a so famous magazin with these kind of outfits and posing like this?

      I wouldn't. and lets pray TOGETHER that this lil kid is not suffering any type of abuse.

      The fact that you dont watch any porn, does not mean that sick things are not happening around you!

      • Vigilant Girl says:

        the facts that i dont watch it makes me see the child in adult clothes and thats it. Hundreds of years ago children were dressed to be minature adults. Look at paintings.

        I would let my child be in vogue, but after I approved the clothes and image.

        I also happen to know there are many people obsessed with the 'dress' of little girls. I guess you never let your kids wear your clothes or shoes-my that would be abuse, wouldn't it?

        I think you and Mimi should lobby against dress up in childcare centers. Happens all the time. @i won't go into that, but who know's some weirdo freak pedophile gardner might be creeping on the kids in there .

      • Sunbeam says:

        i didn't view the picture as being overtly sexy either. for it to be sexy to me, i would have to find a little girl dressed up as actually being sexy.

        i think it is the context that is disturbing to most people, and with that i would agree.

        in and of itself, the picture did not seem sexually suggestive to me.

        after reading the comments about people's reaction to it, then i see it as suggestive. simply because it apparently is suggestive to so many people. it is true that i would not want my little, darling, adorable nieces to appear in an advertisement that will be used as child pornography by pedophiles. however, if my nieces played "dress up" and i took photos, it would not be considered sexualizing, correct? it definitely would not to me. but perhaps the cable guy came in, and happened to see those photos of my niece laying around, and then went home and proceeded to jerk off based on rememberence of them…. see my point about context?

        so, does that mean i am "numb" and "brainwashed" because i don't see the pics as sexy?

        or does that mean that you are "numb" and "brainwashed" because you do?

        hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

        i could say it is a sick mind that sees the pic as sexy. period.

        but since i know that many people here are thinking of their own children being put in that context, i now undertand that you are seeing it from that perspective.

        it helps to be able to view things from another person's perspective sometimes.

    • schnucki says:

      whatever my kids do INSIDE MY HOME, privately and NOT in front of a camera, is my own business, and they can play and be free and do whatever they want to do as long as i keep their environment safe.

      my question was if you would let your child be exposed in a magazin like vogue wearing make up and not just "wearing mom's clothes" because that is a totally different thing from what vogue is trying to sell in those pictures!

      be carefull and not everything that shines out there is gold, perhaps you find it normal and fine and like you say unless you decide what clothes to wear and so thats fine, but you are exposing your kid wether you want it or not, aware or not, to sick people that will use the images of your kid for their own perverse thoughts, and you get cash together with it!

      in my opinion, that is disgusting!

    • Sarah says:

      If the little girl's stillettos were too big for her, her make-up was a mess, along with her hair, then that would be different. If you can't see that picture of that little girl sexed up and made up is disturbing, then you are the one with a problem. Anyone would puts their child in this type of situation is messed up. There are countless stories of perversion in the modeling industry. Wake up.

      • dirty chonies says:

        So if this happens again nobody speak out against it cause people like Vigilant Girl will label YOU a pedo. Facist

    • Not Numbed Or Dumbed says:

      I’m really tired of these “shame-on-you-for-calling-this-sexualized” arguments. As other people on other blogs/comment sections have pointed out, this is NOT the same thing as a girl simply playing dress-up by wearing Mommy’s shoes and makeup. This is professionally styled and photographed. The photos are available to the general public, not sitting in someone’s private family album.

      Secondly, VC and others are not saying the child is sexy; they’re saying the child is sexualized. Big difference. If there were no such thing as child predators, then maybe these photos wouldn’t be such a big deal. But this is the real world with real sicko’s lurking out there. That is why these Jon-Benet Ramsey/Toddlers-and-Tiaras child pageants are dangerous. It’s because somebody, somewhere, will be turned on by it and act out somehow. It makes no sense to try to blame the pedophile culture on someone who feels that children shouldn’t be on display like this in the first place.

  33. Nitto says:

    Hi, can't believe their's controversy about the last picture. It's too disgusting and twisted in a very obvious way. The media is trying to imprint these sick things into our minds

  34. Firebrand says:

    Predictable Masonic devils…my Muslim friend sent me a verse from the Koran where it talks of these people pretending to pray (e.g. be Jewish/Christian/Muslim) to God but really worshipping Jinns…Jinns are the entity that we cannot see. As Leo Zagami stated the alien/reptilian shift shaping is a LIE (to herald in an alien threat/invasion to bring then the NWO to save humanity, a total lie and staged event for satanic world control). These are jinns as they can take animal, human and inanimate forms. They are often mistakenly called ghosts. The worst ones are the demons and the super powerful ones called Ifrit . I am reading up on this it makes sense…knowledge is key and many people speak highly of the authenticity, scientific knowledge of this book the Koran and I am seeing masses converting so something has to be right? We should check it out with an open mind all forms of knowledge for the sake of humanity.

    Jinns are in the world of the unseen and she explained they are an entity older than humanity. Angels are another entity totally in service to God with NO FREE WILL unlike men and jinn. Satan was not a fallen angel but a Jinn though he was in the company of angels as he used to be so pious but was jealous of Adam and his pride and arrogance cost him. He is the total enemy of humanity. Satan is very real that is why the world's elite worship him.

    We need to understand these concepts to know about these events and people as all the dots are starting to connect and humanity must unite against this evil whether people have faith or not, first unite to save humanity…and as I do believe, with the aid of God.

    • ShutterBeg says:

      I used to be a wimp and get frightened at the drop of a hat. Now, I have read so much about Jinns and their deception that my fear is converted to anger now. I have also seen live exorcism and have seen how they lie most of the time. Jinns have varying degrees of power and they adhere to religions too. No wonder, both Christian and Islamic exorcisms go successful, because when a priest or an Imam invokes Jesus or Allah, the Jinns respond according to their own beliefs and get fearful and are compelled to leave. I know a person on whose son was a Jinn without any visible symptoms at all. The son used to have a habit of sleeping in the toilet. One day the son slept in the toilet as usual and then strange noises started coming from the toilet, they had to break the door down and the havent described us ever the scene they saw. Anyway, with the help of a learned person, they removed the Jinn from the son who said that he has been with the son since childhood. Now the Jinn has accepted Islam butis still is friends with the boy who is a teenager. Jinns also pretend to be spirits of dead persons so that people's faith in spirits remain steadfast. Magic is either street tricks or real. The real magick is always carried out with the help of Jinns. They whisper in our hearts and have the power to sow discord between a husband and a wife under the commands of a magician. In addition to inhabiting places where there are no humans, Jinns also inhabit toilets. That's why Moslems are commanded to recite "O Allâh, I seek refuge in you from the male and female devils" everytime they enter a toilet. Chapter 72 of the Quran is titled "Jinn".

    • stacy-nyc says:

      yes with a lot of stars and singers u see them sing about "god" or thank "god" when they win an award. They are not talking about the same god. their god IS satan. Same as the politicans in America who are some type of "christian" like protestants- they are the biggest devil worshipping conspiracy that the world has yet to know…..so is the pope .. but i will not go there right now… they have already met and wrote up the nwo economic plan together…

      not to mention the big crosses around different stars necks to fool us- or bec they are really scared??

  35. KJ says:

    Nice update, VC. Hope you enjoyed your break and keep up the good work.

  36. Noah says:

    http://healthyisthenewskinny.com/wp-content/uploa… & http://healthyisthenewskinny.com/wp-content/uploa

    Mentioned this on last weeks post, Tyra with the wings and the weird schoolgirl outfit. It's almost like someone's telling her You're in school now! She is going to Harvard isn't she? On the Fashion Police, one of the commentators said this is something she'd only wear if she was hearing voices in her head. And then Joan Rivers started playing with random objects putting them over her eye. It was all quite weird, kind of funny.

    WISH I could find the clip of it but it's probably lost now.

    • Amy says:

      Tyra's been using the wings lately to promote her new book, Modelland. Check out this page. The cover of the book is a winged eye. And there's a picture of her on the subway with the wings again.

      http://www.thefashionspot.com/blogs/forum-buzz/16

      Not only is she wearing it, but other riders are too. Her mindless followers, perhaps. And maybe it's just me but the tight play suit, the stripper boots, the pose with the legs far apart, and the placement of the pole comes off as sexual. On top of that, the woman's facial expression just looks plain nuts. :S

      • Noah says:

        I just realized the girl on the bottom right of the picture has the weird eye cover on her right eye instead of her left. Then I FREAKED

        When I noticed she was wearing a cross around her neck.

        D:

  37. Anthony says:

    Here is no shortage of Occult symbolism in movies these days either. It has become in your face type symbols plus the hidden ones. Good job reporting to the public.

  38. Noah says:

    Also noticed the first dress is basically baby doll lace with some trashy jersey underneath it. Kind of an odd combination… ;)

  39. Hip Hop is Dead! says:

    That Lindsey Lohan photo is a trip. I can imagine the scene with the photographer, hired models, and crew taking orders and thinking nothing of doing a photo like this. I'd rather stop acting and modeling than come home at the end of the work day regretting what I did. It's a terrible feeling. Your kids are going to see these, your friends, your mom and dad too. They're not going to be happy like those sick "artists". There are plenty of actors and models that regret scenes they have shot of them that they aren't proud of and would never want you to see.

    • JUSTASTLIST says:

      That was for a film she was supposed to do before all of her troubles. A story about porn star

      Linda Lovelace.

  40. Sharlemagne says:

    Okay….all are really disturbing…specially Lindsay…!

    *blocks pornographic imagining in mind*

    Damn….

  41. NJ says:

    I never guessed super junior would be in this, as for that singaporean singer I think shes simply following 'trends' you know how they are…

    • Elouise says:

      You could say that, but I'm from Singapore, and as far as I know Singapore is a very, very, very strange place. The citizens are practically brainwashed (tired of life actually), and all that 'crime-free' and 'nothing will happen if you support us' thing apparently seems to make citizens totally unaware of anything, like when something goes wrong, they will complain, yes, complain. It ruins their independence. The slightly communist thinking of Singapore (look up Barisian Sosialis) affects everyone's thinking (IT IS THE GOVERNMENT after all).

      I know this has probably nothing to do with the singer, but it's just to let people know that Singapore IS in on this conspiracy (I did my research, thank you very much), not just some country which is ignored. Thhe government screens our phones, blackmails anyone who dares to defy the People's Action Party, about the same thing as America, just on a smaller scale. If China can do it, Singapore can.

      If a 13 year old can figure this out, any sane person can.

      • Traveller says:

        I visited Singapore in 2005 to see some friends. It was a very interesting place, relatively clean and safe. Cool buildings. But talking to the friend left me with a kind of weird perception of that country and its rules. While on the surface, all the rules seemed to contribute to a pretty organized society, it also seems right on the border of overly controlled society.

        At first the rules seem pretty reasonable. For example, my friend explained that the country discouraged the ownership of cars by charging, in addition to the price of the vehicle, another fee that could be ~ 20,000 Singaporean dollars, or more (at the time, 1 us dollar was worth about 2 singaporean dollars). The rationale was that the country was an island, and therefore couldn't have a lot of cars running around. Sounds reasonable, especially since they have a good public transportation system.

        And about the public transportation, all the buses, streetcars, and even some cabs could be paid for with one card. (I know some cities in the US are also implementing portions of this as well) This same card was used to deduct parking fares, and tolls to enter certain parts of the city. And again, I have heard of plans like this in other parts of the world. So in any case, the idea is definitely becoming more popular.

        But then, I started thinking about this some more. That's a pretty stiff fee to charge for owning a car. And while you might be able to get around Singapore without one, what if you had business in Malaysia (the country directly north). Or just needed to be able travel outside of the country period (Singapore is the size of a medium city). Car owners were also charged if they didn't clean their car. There were probably other vehicle fees my friend didn't get around to telling me about. Then, being tolled to enter (not park in, just to drive in) parts of the city area via car. And the whole idea of one card controlling all your alternative transportation options; it IS convenient, no doubt, But if you can access all that information from one place, that means others can too…. (at very least, it shows how much was added, and deducted for each transaction, probably will show from where and at what time — can any one say tracking…)

        Just those few laws by themselves don't sound too bad (it is THEIR country after all; they can do what they want). I know when I started down this line of reasoning, I though I was perhaps getting paranoid. Too much NWO input and the like. But when countries habitually get used to being controlled in such a way, it often leads to something on the sinister side. Now I know certain groups proclaim how "sinister" just means left-handed, and how that's really a fine thing, etc. But I've also noticed that it is almost always at least one person associating themselves with said groups that ends up into stuff giving them control over others in a truly exploitative way.

  42. frequent reader says:

    The comments aren't displaying on the article page in Firefox and Opera.

  43. Dylan T. says:

    The Hayley picture was really interesting.

  44. Vigilant Citizen says:

    Poor Lohan.. :/

    Just another childhood Disney victim.

  45. Boostalk says:

    It's all amazing..how they are making this crap art

  46. saschi says:

    Cute little owl….. too bad nobody knows the real meaning of it.

  47. Anna says:

    The picture in the French Vogue is revolting.

  48. damn Hyuna is awesome, hot and awesome again.

    Illuminati satan-worshiper or not, I'm in love. :)

    oh and her video for Bubble Pop rules.

  49. d says:

    ok i tried to find something about paramore breaking up because of negative messages, but could not.. is this just sensationalism?..something your apparently against.

  50. Trace says:

    The Lindsay Lohan picture was for a Linda Lovelace role she was set to play, then eventually dropped from. Inferno I think will be the name of the film. Not a "sex kitten photoshoot".

  51. Bandy says:

    I can safely speak for everyone and say we have all dearly missed your articles V.C.

  52. jayLin says:

    Can't wait for the new articles!!!!!!

  53. FLYNN says:

    I noticed two satanic references within the letter "K" of the name "Kelli": an upside-down "crucifix" and an upside-down "pentagram" (incomplete). (Refer to the photo link of http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/201….

    • Fighter4God says:

      You are right but it also looks like an unfinished pentagram ; if you link the lines a pentagram will be appear

  54. iconoclast says:

    The brain with the butterfly wings says it all. The vigilant family is always in the know!

  55. Kapalua says:

    Keep 'em coming! Very interesting.

  56. Fighter4God says:

    Those pics are really blatant ; the last picture is shoking because it sexualizes a little girl (her name Thylane Blondeau , 10 years old) . She maybe had a kitten programming … That is horrible.

    By the way, thank's for your wonderful website, it is my favourite!

  57. Minds-Eye says:

    That Lohan pic is pretty sick, but then again it is Lindsey Lohan. Interesting find on Paramore breaking up. Good work VC.

  58. Ali says:

    Does anyone realise an increase in mickey symbolism? I know its been around for ages but theres a defiant market jump!

  59. Peter says:

    Nice update. Enjoy your well deserved vacation VC!

  60. Kakumei says:

    Great finds, as usual.

    The sh*t just keeps rolling in, doesn't it? It's a never ending wave of indoctrination, and propaganda. The child Vogue and Lindsay Lohan ones in particular were vastly disturbing, to say the least. o.o

  61. Jennifer says:

    The Lindsay Lohan picture and the French vogue little girl are particularly disturbing – they're portrayed like pieces of meat rather than as real live human beings.

  62. truth-seeker says:

    I am wondering about these symbols: Owl, Cupcake etc, so much featured in style, etc in Accessiorize's collections: the butterflyes, the babucha dolls, flowers, bows, roses, London-theme, small animal things, small things(that are usually big, etc. purse in keyringsize), owls, birds, hedgehog, name "Woodland", dots, hearts etc..

  63. Anonymous says:

    Wow, that Lindsay Lohan one really disturbs me.

  64. jjet says:

    sick/sick/sick–I wanna take that girls parents and plant a kick placed just so….poor child.

  65. mariaa says:

    i dont see anything associated with sex kitten programming in lindsay lohans shoot,or am i wrong?can someone explain

  66. zacky avarientos says:

    Desensitization is pretty much overflowing. Keep it up VC.

    The ruling class has the schools and press under its thumb. This enables it to sway the emotions of the masses.

    -Albert Einstein

  67. Sabrina says:

    Great Job VC! I am disgusted by LiLo's photoshoot!!! Who in their right mind would want to be portrayed that way?! Obv someone who has no say (due to hunger for fame/mind control)

  68. shehaam says:

    Omw! those LV models are skinny…. they should have some…. nah countless servings of mac and cheese.

  69. Fawad says:

    Crazy shit!

  70. shehaam says:

    that girl looks like a 13 year old popping her booty, its twisted. something paedos look forward to.

  71. KillerBee says:

    Don't you think lindsay lohan pic is the most shocking one??! morals? anyone??? seriously, what they tried to say with that? can't believe how clear this is… she's obviously portrayed as a sexual object and her parents are just looking. Shameful and disgusting…

    • shehaam says:

      she said masons are planning to have her killed. i guess this pic is her way of staying alive, this idiot has sold her soul to lucifer just to have another hermes handbag.

  72. Kwasi says:

    Ohhhh these people dont sieze to amaze me!!

  73. Guillotine says:

    Thanks Vc…for all the articles and the 'job' you do .. from gr ! For the girl on picture i have reed she is ten years and doter of famous football "star"….

  74. Sighs says:

    Hey VC, can you please give us a link to an article about Paramore's break up over Hayley's negative messages? I'd really like to read that

  75. Me says:

    Oh, this is your new post. I remembered the last picture and just searched for your entry to post the link to an article on the last picture in Britain's Daily Mail
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2022979

  76. Adriana Lockhart says:

    Never.

  77. kiki says:

    Wow! It will never end will it

  78. severalminds says:

    pls, VC write about rocky horror show, of course it is too obvious as a propaganda of evil, the personage of rocky horror is a tyoical devil as by apprearance so by philosophy, behaviour, sick entertainment and etc. Tha excess of sadis, violence, pervertion promote by this movie as something "funny and genuine"…But there r still some people who don't get that it was a step to make appear the deivl as smart and "lovely" on eyes of stupid youth…
    http://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&ch

  79. me says:

    hayley is just disappointing alot of people …..this is not what i expected from paramore since they have talent and they would have been famous even without all this illuminati shit…….:(

  80. 2hot2handle says:

    lol i agree with all the pictures minus 2 the lindsay lohan one, and the one hayley posted.

    first… lindsay lohan did that photshop when she was going to play linda loveless the girl from deep throat? the porno actress? so the intention was to depict her like a porn star….

    the picture hayley poster is from a graphic designer i forgot his name.. but he even made a visit to my school to talk about his work and his so not into that occult stuff.

    • mumox says:

      any way you could recall the name of the artist?

      tried to find him online, but to no avail… im very interested in finding out more about him!

  81. Kirsten says:

    It's almost depressing.

  82. Jermaine Brooks says:

    I'm getting sick of seeing the same old symbolism everywhere I look.

    It seems I can no longer watch a film or music video or leaf through a magazine without being bombarded with all this symbolism crap.

    Can't the Illuminati just take over the world now and get it over with?

  83. fake says:

    That linsay lohan one is really weird

    First?

  84. fluffydragonite says:

    God i love vigilant's humor.

  85. agamble says:

    Can anything be more blatant than these images and their meanings?

  86. Sara says:

    I love emily browning! Such a disappointment to see her cover her eye. Although her choice of movies are quite questionable…Sucker Punch is Monarch Programming and Sex Kittens (article on VC)….Sleeping Beauty is ANOTHER Monarch Programming about a girl wanting to make money and becomes a prostitute that is unconscious throughout the men doing her and Leminy Snickets Series of Unfortunate Events is more or less Control ad trying to programme the children. Im just 15 but i have more sense than most of these oblivious teenagers!

  87. krueger says:

    not singapore! D:

  88. Crip says:

    Anyone else notice how the 'K' in Kelly's pic can be completed to become a pentagram?

  89. kibodabi says:

    can someone please get a pic of the guys in the owl's head masks that have been playing on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim? I can't do it and it's bugging me to no end that it isn't being properly exposed!

    How I long for the fulfillment of The Promised Day…..

    "Even so, come, Lord Jesus."

    "Even so, Lord Jesus, hurry."

    Christ in Esu Immanuel, HURRY!

    • Oye Vey says:

      Ugh, I can't STAND those Adult Swim unicorn/owl/etc. symbolistic commercials, so annoying and blatant! I used to think (@ 13 years of age about 8 years ago) that they were just funny/random/weird and even cool. That's "their" goal anyway, right? Psht..

      • Noah says:

        I always thought adult swim was commenting on that, blatantly.

        Know the one recently of the woman at the computer and her face is flashing colors like the computer screen?

        Just thought it was blatantly putting it out there.

  90. Max Gianni says:

    That Lindsey Lohan pic basically sums up the life of a Disney Kid, boys and girl.

  91. billygirl says:

    Notice how Kelly Poon's 'K' is an incomplete Pentagram?

    Sheesh. Talk about over kill.

    Next we'll be seeing little kids in school playgrounds all lined up doing the One-Eyed thingy. Parents, take a look around your children's school, see if there are any One-Eyed, Masonic type 'educational' posters about.

  92. ceteta says:

    i believe that lindsey lohan picture is actually of her as edie sedgwick when she was high and got gang banged in a motel

  93. billygirl says:

    I knew they'd get to Lindsay sooner or later. They just had to keep wearing her down, setting her up to be the stupid party girl (which she is but is way too valuable to Satanic Hollywood to go unnoticed).

    Now watch her image totally change, her career sky rocket, and all her legal troubles fade away. There's no way Lindsay would ever make in Hollywood without the Cult getting a piece of her.

    Course, we can all thank fame and money whores Mommy and Daddy…

  94. stargazers says:

    The sooner you people realize that we are in a spiritual war, the more sense this will all make. It is imperative that you do not underestimate the power of Satan and his demons. THEY are here on earth to take as many souls as possible- This will be a battle until the very end. The bible predicts it and one verse in particular should paint a clear picture: "The love of the greater number will cool off" (I forget the exact book/verse number). That means as we get closer to the end, love will be replaced with hatred in the hearts of many. This is inevitable. Jesus will HAVE to come back and intervene because this is what man turns to when left to his own devices. Satan knows this, the government knows this,…they only have a limited amount of time to collect as many souls as possible.

    Now you are wondering how to live in the last days while everything seems to be SO bad. Have faith and trust in the Lord- He has made each of us special to inherit the gifts on this earth. All we have to do is love each other. THEY do such a good job at creating division ..it is everywhere… Rich vs. Poor, Black vs. White, Male vs Female, Smart vs. Dumb, Skinny vs. Fat…..it goes on and on and on. All for what? We must rise above all of this pointless hatred. When they get ahold of the internet, we will be left to act in the real world…Do not be quick to anger, but educate and listen. Have compassion for each other because we are truly in for a show (The last days). Hold on to what is real… invest more times in mind healthy activities, call an elderly family member for fresh perspective, go for a nature swim, take a neighbor a little something and strike up a conversation about what is going on today. Get a plan!! Do not isolate yourself because that is EXACTLY WHAT THE WANT-DIVIDE AND CONQUER…they have been working on this for centuries to get us to this point….Don't be fooled.

    • stargazers says:

      And by the way Vig, take as much time as you need. You deserve a break from all this debauchery :)

  95. stella says:

    can anybody tell me the graphic designer who made the image of monarch mind control that hayley posted? i'm very intrigued!!

    also, maybe the specific blog entry of hayley herself please? couldn't find it!

    thanks in advance!

  96. Anonymka says:

    Whitney Huston and Mariah Carey – When you believe(Oscar 1999) = 2:58 – 3:39
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7qX3eQVnQ0&fe

    • Nicky B says:

      Ok.. that performance was something else, there was the eye, the sun, the pyramid, the compass and the square, checkered floor and the two columns of Solomon’s Temple(stairways). I mean.. did they leave anything out.. wait.. I was waiting for one of them to do the OK sign… wow… wow… this blatant symbolism has been around for a while. I remember that song and performance and I didn't know what all of it meant.. thought it was a "pretty and creative" set design.. I am now wondering about he white dresses. Considering they were in a mock Masonic Hall, was that a ritual of some sort…!?!?!?!? who knows.. Wow.. thank you for that….

  97. truth-seeker says:

    Vigilant Girl, I got to say, all though I can not be sure what I have taken up of subliminal messages in my life, that as a kid, I loved to play with boys, whach their "stuff" and they'd watch mine, and play with it etc. Now my familiy didn't own a TV before I was 10 or something, and in kindergarden I was always playing with the boys. I don't remember if we played "nurse" or not, but we sure did play with our "small things", and I don't see why that should be a bad thing, it is not like I am playing around like that now or anything.

  98. miss B says:

    That purple and blue LV handbag is so cute!:) LOL…

    And the K in that Kelly girls signature is an incomplete pentagram…and that masonic compass logo is also enhanced with its circle around it also making it look a bit like a pentagram in my opinion…dunno if anyone else has thoughts on them?

  99. inquisitor says:

    no shit!! The 'K' actually is a pentegram with a few line rubbed off!

  100. Pest says:

    Stop talking to us as we would be crazy! And btw, I don't have children and certainly I'm not dressing myself like a slut! Don't judge people you don't know!

    Today it is not hard to come across disturbing shit and porn! No matter if you watch TV, Internet, Magazines, Commercials, Radio, stores etc, there always will be porn! And do you know why? Because it draws attention, makes people talk about, it sells good! Ever heard of "Sex sells!"?

    In Europe they use porn in puplic and commercials a lot! So much that it makes it hard to avoid! I once got so annoyed that I asked the owner of a store (that sells bags and suitcases) that this is a sex-shop or bag-store? Because they had a large slutty picture of a naked woman hanging outside of their store window!

    I admit I do like erotic art(as long it still is tastefully made!), but I would never show it to children! Also I find it irresponsible to let young children on the internet and give them cellphones! Even if you have one of these child protection software on the computer, sooner or later the one or other nasty shit leaks through, and besides this children are smart, they will try anything to access the forbidden stuff!

    I agree with you what you said with the parents! It seems that people get too lazy these days to raise children properly! And at the end you see messed up children that have no respect at all! Spoiled children and dogs are the horror!

    "Describing her body like you would a slut/whore. Poisoned minds."

    I didn't say anything about her body, I criticised the clothes and pose.

    • Vigilant Girl says:

      @Pest,

      Maybe if you read your first comment you would see. You judged me first. Saying 'it's people like you etc etc' forgetting so fast aren't you?

      OUR WORLD IS SIMPLY, SICK, SAD AND GETTING WORSE! We aren't getting rid of evil, so what should we expect? People are desentizied. Children are pure. Many of these pedophiles aren't dealt with. They should be named, shamed and locked up. No sort of parole. None of the mental madneess whatever thier lawyers come up with.. lawyers shouldnt even help them.

      it's just sad basically. The same argument came up on a show I was watching about rape. Women should not be raped regardless of clothing-while some argue the clothing a woman wears tempts them. I have yet to hear of a woman raping a man because he wore no shirt. I hope you can see where I'm coming from. We are throwing responsibility for sick actions on children, instead of dealing with the sick men. :-/

      • Pest says:

        I agree with you! Sorry if I came across rude!

        Also important is to speak out what is wrong! Otherwise there will be no change!

  101. Jacky says:

    1. Why every one in the pics above looks like a doll or a mannequin ?

    2. Since when freaky wierd stuff became an " art " ? and r these people expecting us to accept and respect their work or way of thinking ? and why did they decide just now to expose every thing to us ?

    Many questions one might ask …….

    By the way check this out http://www.curioos.com/Explore

    and plz share ur thoughts about it if u like cz it freaks me out when i feel the only one who sees the symbolism of that rubbish or as they call it " modern art " .

    Thx Vc gr8 work every week .

    • Amy says:

      Weird page. O_O

      Well, to me, art is expression. Art is a chance for someone to represent what they feel and what's on their mind, and display it in a visual form for the whole world to see. Seeing that page, many of the art doesn't seem to express anything. The artists just seem to try to "outdo" each other in weirdness factor.

      Then again, that's just me. Everyone can have their own opinion on what the significance value of an art piece is. That's what makes art interesting. There is no uniform or set way of it to be. What seems like "rubbish" to someone can mean a lot to the artist or another person. Just because the art isn't in the taste of Leonardo da Vinci or Van Gogh doesn't mean it's useless.

      Like us, on Vigilant Citizen. We see the significance of a photoshoot when the model is covering one eye, standing on a Masonic checkered floor, and wearing leopard prints, while somebody else sees nothing and thinks it's "rubbish." That's just how art is. You can't get everyone to see it's significance.

      And about the doll/mannequin comment, because the people in the photos are told to pose that way. Illuminati wants you to be brainless and mindless after all, and that's how it is symbolized in pictures. They make the models look transfixed, emotionless, and doll-like. :(

      Yes, they want us to accept their way of thinking. They don't care about respecting their ideas, just accepting it. That's what needs to take place in order for NWO to happen. They want people to willingly follow their beliefs with no opposition. They want everyone to be Satanists and unite as one, for a world of "peace."

      Their symbolism has always been around. It's just that a majority of us have been too blind to notice it. Their symbolism is, however, getting more blatant. We are nearing closer to when they plan to fulfill… something. NWO, perhaps. I don't know if the world is truly going to end but all I have to say is make sure you accept God as your savior. I don't mean to spread fear but it is the truth.

  102. Bunifa Latifa Halifa says:

    the pictures of the Louis Vuitton ads are kind of creepy…..

  103. Anna says:

    The last picture almost made me puke…the people who made the poor child pose like that, are a disgrace to human race. This is just sick!

  104. 21jennifer says:

    Björk an Icelandic singer-songwriter

    HER PIC CHECK HER OUT SO SO OBVIOUS

    http://thebosh.com/upload/2009/06/02/bjork_-_inte

  105. carol says:

    sex kitten on south american tv?
    http://www.youtube.com/embed/Q1Vr3p-AEKA

  106. jk says:

    I have a picture of Dolores O'Riordan (the cranberries) flashing the same sign covering her eye with a hand

    where can I send it to?

  107. Mfest says:

    Does everyone realize those are transvestites in the fashion add? VC, you should make a note of it.

    • 21jennifer says:

      how did you know that ???? i am not sure about that !!!

      but i am sure that they used real women even in the runway they used a well known models

  108. Kimberli says:

    It is so unforunate that LiLo is in an industry that exploits her fragile mental health. We may never know the true extent of how messed up she is. What we see in pix like this just barely scratches the surface.

  109. B3thaNIiLOv3syhU says:

    Hi V.G! :) Okay, well recently my daughter read a book titled 'Candor', once she'd finished it I read it too. I found it very interesting as it was about a town in Florida (a very neat and prestige one too) that a kept in a good state of mind by programming the children's brains through music. I honestly think you should read it as it is very interesting ;)

  110. Jenn W says:

    keep it up VC!! Loves it!

  111. 3 says:

    If anyone wants to see something disturbing relating to children, look at this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYRIYL5uP6w

    I dunno what's worse, the video itself or the nonchalant reaction in the comments from mothers and other people (in this version of the video, people are more sensible, but if you look at the official one, no comment besides praise is let through and it's shocking how people don't see anything wrong with it at all).

    The child model pales in comparison to this…

  112. batn says:

    http://www.rap-up.com/2011/07/06/album-cover-game
    covering one eye, but this guy is a huge fan/supporter of tupac, who was killuminati, and when his music video was banned from BET he said some anti-illuminati remark on twitter, might be interesting if you dig a little deeper :)

  113. HDK says:

    Doesn't seem to important.

  114. Doodles says:

    Don't know where else to post or ask this… is anyone here aware of anything in the works for 09/13/11 it adds up to 33–don't the mystery religions/Luciferians/Illuminati have a strong interest in numerology? Has anyone seen or heard anything? Seems like those numbers are almost worshipped themselves by those groups. With all the attention being put on the year 2012, wouldn't it make sense, if you wanted catch people off guard, to strike with something before they expect it? I know there is a 2 in that date as well, 09/13/2011 that does not add up to 33, but when 09/11/00 hit the 2 in 2000 didn't seem to factor in. Maybe it's meaningless, just wondered if anyone has heard seen anything. We are getting close and seeing some major dangerous economic issues happening right now–could we be parlaying into something worse soon (bigger than a financial collapse itself) the fallout or aftermath? Maybe the date is nothing, just wondering. Funny, I googled the date and the first thing that came up was something about rethinking prisons. Unrelated to the internment camps, but still odd.

    • Sarah Connor says:

      And don't forget 11/11/11 – that's a doozy! Don't 'know' of anything, but I'm un-initiated lol….or Thank God! I haven't known about this stuff for very long, but I am noticing it now all the time – they mark their territory like dogs! I've posted similar to this a few times lately but my comments keep getting deleted? Anywhoz, just emailed the below clip this afternoon to one of my friends, thought you'd find interesting:

      Satanists believe that a carefully planned event must be carried out according to the correct numbers, or it may not be successful. They go to great lengths to make an event occur according to the correct numbers. As Wescott explains, "… so 11 is the essence of all that is sinful, harmful, and imperfect." [Ibid., p. 100] Thus, while 11 is very important, multiplication's are also important, such as 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, and 99.

      http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1756.cfm

      These luciferian's running the globe leave their fingerprints on everything!! Here are the most recent….at least according to my extremely novice eye. It continues to floor me how obvious it is……

      1. Osama Bin Laden killed on Beltaine day (2nd biggest satanic holiday) exactly '66' years to the day of Hitler's reported death by Seal Team '6'

      2. Norway Shooting 6/22/2011….so 3 11's in there….then the cherry on the cake – '77' dead – so 4 referenced 11's, the luci's are drooling on themselves with this one – PS – shooter is delta programmed mk, I'd bet $$$$

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/

      3.Super Congress aka Council of '13' (bloodlines) enacted on 8/2/11 – '77' years to the date of Hitler's illegal self promotion to Furher http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hitler

      Also of note is that this 'event' of both Hitler and our new Council of 13 – is that it falls directly between the only two satanic holidays in August. These guys party a lot, no joke.

      *8/1 – Lammas Day – animal and or human sacrifice (so they make an offering)

      *8/2 – see events pulled off by above mentioned devil worshippers

      *8/3 – satanic revels – sexual ritual with 7-17 yo girls (revels defined: Engage in lively and noisy festivities, esp. those that involve drinking and dancing. to take great pleasure or delight (usually followed by in ): to revel in luxury; to make merry; indulge in boisterous festivities.) Sounds like a celebration type holiday directly following the offering and brought about event, cause that is what it is.

      4. 8/6/11 – Seal Team '6' killed on the '66' anniversary of the Hiroshima Bomb. So again with the multiples of 11's and then the added additional 6 to make the number of the beast. Devilishly clever~

      “Those dedicated to bringing in the Luciferic one-world Global Government know that much bloodshed is needed to bring about the necessary “spiritual vibrations” (cooperation of devils) to bring in the New Order. This bloodshed is accomplished by way of ritual killings; planned terrorist events, planned disasters and wars; catastrophes caused by weather modification; abortion; suicide; euthanasia; killings in foster care, and every conceivable way of causing death — especially on a large scale.” quoted from libertytothecaptives.net

      These evil psychopaths seriously annoy me!!!! And they are running the world…….but only for now! Time is running short, hence the kick up in activity.

      • pickyeater says:

        Sarah Connor…great information, might want to also post on GLP.

        Keep up the great work VC!

      • Magmansa says:

        Hey Sarah

        Very interesting! I wonder what the 11 phenomenon is about then? Not sure if you've heard of it, people all over the world always seeing the number 11.

        Also I was reading some of your comments on the 2012 olympic torch article and was going to suggest to you to watch Rik Clay 2012 transition of the ages video. Very interesting video talking about royal family ect., you're almost right about your prince charles theory….almost:-)

        He died shortly after this video at the young age of 26, is it possible he stumble upon their big plan? You should really check it out.

        Keep well

      • Doodles says:

        Thanks Sarah Connor for the numerology info. It sure seems like there is a really common thread of certain numbers and dates that traumatic events happen on and numbers of poeple involved. I thought about the 11/11/11 date too–little nervous about those dates… There's a fellow named Mike Hoggard who does a lot of research on the NWO and numerology if you google his name then click on WatchmanVideoBroadcast.com he has a lot of vids with NWO info. He is a Preacher and relates a lot of what he says to the Bible. He has some really interesting things to say and incorporates a lot of info. people send him into his blogs. This kind of stuff seems so superstitious to me, it blows my mind that people in high places believe numbers could have special power–I guess another way Satan gets them to look away from Jesus for salvation/life to something else for supposed knowledge or power.

  115. it really hurts me to see Hayley Williams mentioned in your articles, especially in this way. :/

    I wish Paramore would go back to how they were during AWKIF!

    also, why did someone have to link the blogpost, because now i'm crying again, haven't got over that.

    That French Vouge photoshoot is just horrible

    Emily Browning is also a very big role model of mine (Hayley being to), and it sickens me to see her this way, even though i enjoyed suckerpunch.

  116. Kpop lover says:

    I am asian. I visit this site often and the facebook page. :) I love to read all your comments too btw.

    Thanks VC for doing more on kpop, jpop, c(hinese)pop, etc.

    The more you do the more I can refer my friends to this page who also love kpop.

    Believe it or not many are listening more to kpop than any other. I mean my Vietnamese, Chinese, Filipino friends don't really listen to their own kind, just only kpop. Shows how much influence they have!

    Kpop artists often travel to other countries to promote and perform as well it's how they gain massive exposure and also their catchy tunes are always a plus.

    The Korean entertainment industry is huge. They know how to work it too. What I mean is that they use their most famous pop star singer and put them in Kdramas and gain massive views and ratings and of course influences. By doing this they will get a bigger following and with that they can influence, brain wash them more..

    Their korean dramas (kdramas) which is mainly romance but has some symbols, not many but lots of words we are familiar with. They use words such as "puppets, sacrifice myself or yourself, selling your soul, devil, ritual" blatantly in their dramas a lot. It's a recurring thing and not just once. You hear it so much drives you nuts! In the past it wasn't like this but lately it seems to be.

    Some of their dramas makes me think if that is what is really going on in Korea because in the very beginning of these dramas they put captions such as "these stories and characters are fictional" but when watching you can see some of reality though it. Mirror image I must say.

    I know that Asians love to copy everything western people do, however if we look deep, we can all see that it's not just copying or influences.

    Just a thought for those who don't know much about Korean entertainment.

  117. Aislinn says:

    Hello! =) I read your one about Paramore with the Brick by Boring Brick and I agree with everything you said =) even though I like that song. I would have commented there but I couldn't find how to anywhere, I'm not experienced with this site hahaha. Also I wanted to add that there are some of us teenagers who understand what your saying, we arn't all a lost cause =]. Your work has made me more insightful, now I see this symbolism in everything like disney (Ahhhh! It's to upsetting, I love disney!!) and that National Treasure movie is a big one too, great film though. Anyway I really like what you've written, some people think this stuff is all unrealistic, it messes with your head when you think that that is probably what the illuminati wants you to think. Keep writing =)

    • Aislinn says:

      Ooooooh I want to add that I don't believe we are in a war with demons and satan though I do believe that the government if hiding so much from us and moulding us in places like school, teaching us only certain things. I think that they are keeping secret their contact with other non-human races and teaching us that things like angels and psychics are just crazy stupid myths. I'm not saying we arn't at war, I think we are on earth and universally, but I don't believe in satan, I'm all for angels and God though. I believe in mind over matter and if we truely believe that evil is real then we put the energy into it and that makes it exist. If you could worship Satan than he wouldn't want to be loved, he would want to be feared, so lets stop fearing him to make him powerless.

      It also makes me angry that the world is fighting. Its not the people but the government that are fighting, they are bringing down the billions of others for politics. I'm starting to vent now and I'm sorry, there arn't many people you can talk to about things like this or they think your crazy. I'm not sure if I said things right in the first paragraph. I'm not insulting anyone who has beliefs or is Christain or Catholic. I think you guys are great, the good things that are in the Bible outway the bad and I'm all for religion. Anyway I hope that what I said made sense and was helpful if not interesting at all.

      • stargazers says:

        I made the post about being at war with Satan and I think you are misinterpreting. It is very naive to think the government is this all powerful entity that runs us all into the ground with no force behind them. Acknowledging Satan doesn't necessarily make him more powerful and you shouldn't be fearful. TRUSTING in God and His word gives a sense of peace through the chaos. You can almost think of Satan as an annoying gnat if you want to, whatever gives you piece of mind. Spiritually, in order to know where you stand (God wants our spirits all or nothing), you must see the works of Satan in order to confront what is happening in your own life. Everyday you must consciously decide to use your moral compass in making decisions to be more Christlike. Simply ignoring Satan will not cut it. It won't make it go away… neither do you need to spend time dwelling on his evil 'works', which is why sometimes I think being on this site hinders rather than helps. With that being said, when it comes to the battle of good and evil (which hopefully we never see in our lifetime), you MUST know what side you are on…If you are keeping it real with God, You need to keep it real with yourself.

  118. Simone says:

    the last picture is the most shocking!!!:(

  119. Kedii says:

    I also found this picture on Hayley Williams' blog: http://yelyahwilliams.tumblr.com/post/6883647157

    Mickey Mouse and a young Hayley, quoted as being "the best day of her life" Suspicious?

    This is the link to her entire blog for anyone who's interested. Some weird mind control crap on there. http://yelyahwilliams.tumblr.com/

  120. fedup says:

    If still in doubt over the sexualisation issue i suggest you google Thyland Blondeau and make ur own assesment of the pictures they take of little girls.

    Ultimately the kids are used for marketing. The question that needs to be asked here is who the target audience is. That will determine the motives of that photo shoot. If you understand what vogue stands for and the topics tackled within that magazine throughout the years then you will be very clear on the use of that little girl and the context of that ad.

  121. lolitalempicka says:

    but..with all this evendency and similarities with michey, closed eye, animal print clothes, ecc… are "they" proud by doing these photos and claime to be part of this? Or simply they submit in order to what "they" tell them to do???

  122. hanacrizantemum says:

    Hey VC! Check out this photo of Daniel Radcliffe http://danradcliffe.co.uk/gallery/albums/userpics

  123. hanacrizantemum says:

    What's up with Daniel's hand? http://www.magxone.com/uploads/2009/07/Daniel-Rad

  124. stacy-nyc says:

    don't know where to post this- can't find remember the article you have on a church you have in manhattan with hidden masonic imagery carved in on top ? well we are up to the fall of wall street part right now….at least ppl are losing faith in this whore of babylon..country downgraded…… the tsunamis are next in the future…

    let's not focus on controversial pics they know we are focusing on now.. there are bigger things going on this country… also for those who think walt disney was one of them- i think it was after they became corporate i don't think he himself was part of it.. he was a cartoonist and not behind the music and tv show sector they play a part in- that was after disney's time but yes the company is in on recruiting young ppl to the business and that's why u see them all with the mickey ears now…

  125. CalAsian says:

    Sohee and Hyuna (ex-WG) … the future of Suzy of MiSSA.

    The Super Junior photo is old. It still has 13 people standing. It now has 10 (hangeng went back to China, Kibum left the group, and Kangin in the military)

  126. hey says:

    VC you still on vacation? You straving us out…

  127. Joe says:

    So with all this information available, does anyone have a battle plan to take down this beast we call the illuminati?

    So far, all I hear and read are, "Spread the word", "Give yourself to Christ" and "Boycott anything with these symbols". The one that has had any effect at all (if any) is boycotting. The other two are just preaching to the choir.

  128. truth-seeker says:

    MUSICAL CULT CONTROL:

    THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION’S WAR ON CONSCIOUSNESS THROUGH THE IMPOSITION OF A=44OHZ STANDARD TUNING

    “Bio-creation, and health restoration, may have more to do with frequencies of sound energy, or music, than has been previously thought.”

    http://web.mac.com/len15/MUSICAL_CULT_CONTROL/Leo

  129. Daniel says:

    Jersey shore twit Snooki following the white rabbit:

    http://rumorfix.com/2011/08/which-jersey-shore-st

  130. Oscar says:

    It looks like her face has been used for semenancy….this is so sad to me….

  131. LissyNumber says:

    RE: the negative messages in Paramore songs

    … Josh panics about "Careful" contradicting a Bible verse (which was probably Jesus specifically addressing the Pharisees), but "Misery Business (which really does have a negative message in the 2nd verse (said message contradicting the spirit of the Bible at the very least (and what Paul says of himself in 1Timothy (well, it's assumed that it's of Pauline authorship)))) is okay? Plus, They would probably rather people not get the idea of setting themselves free into their heads (they tried to appropriate the rhetoric by associating it with consuming, but it didn't really work out so well if "No Logo" is anything to go by).

    But yeah, could that picture BE any more symbolic? (well, yeah (finally, a picture without that one-eye thing!), but it is still pretty darn symbolic)

  132. T. says:

    An endless display of more mind control

  133. Purple says:

    Sohee…. urgh gutted. Still love Wonder Girls though.

  134. Sophia says:

    Am I the only that's creeped out to the point I want to punch them and cry? :( I feel bad for Amy Winehouse and others!

  135. Erika says:

    What's wrong with the checker board pattern?

    I'm not really an expert at these things but please, enlighten me.

    Also, I saw some of your articles regarding the checkered floor but isn't that a bit too general?

    I mean, most of the floor/tiles before and nowadays are still checkerboard in pattern.

    I'm no hater, I promise. Just a tad bit confused.

  136. Naomi says:

    NOOO!! I swear i nearly broke down into tears when i saw the picture of the Singaporean star. My friends and I thought our country was safe but I guess we just cant escape from them :(

  137. Angel says:

    I remembered that argument in the newspaper one morning, the one that had a counselor of some kind in it. This is in relation to Paramore. Great on the Farro brothers. I guess that's why I see more shots of Haley in their music videos than the other guys. I don't know exatly what went on with them but I think it's a great revelation to what's really going on in the music scene. Until now, I still wonder, I am going to graduate next year with a diploma in performing arts. What would happen to me?

  138. Angel says:

    By the way, I am from Malaysia.

  139. scarletxskye says:

    but some of the members of Super Junior are Christians. di lang dahil maycheckboard illuminati na (google translate it) anyway to the paramore issue, it is obviously true. Before they went mainstream, they were a "Christian" band. and the reason why Farro brothers left the group because of Hayley's lyrics cuz they realized that it contradicts on what they believed in. alam na!