New Film Shows Diana “Very Much Alive” After Car Crash

169

One of the first articles I’ve published on Vigilant Citizen was “Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning” which describes the  events and the symbolism relating to the ritual sacrifice of Lady Di. While most people still buy the official “accident” story, evidence mounts that an accident was not the cause of Diana’s death, but was actually a set up leading to her murder.

A new film entitled Unlawful Killing (to be released everywhere except the UK) will apparently be showing a pictures of Diana right after the accident…still alive and not dying. Furthermore, the movie will show Diana predicting the circumstances of her death.The movie is backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, the father of Diana’s fiancé who also died that night.

Unlawful Killing will probably not dwell on the occult and ritualistic side of things. It remains, after all, a mass media production. When cover-ups are too sloppy and evidence begin piling disproving them, limited concessions are made to quell the public’s questions. This movie might be a limited concession, where part of the big ugly truth is revealed in order to protect the “bigger uglier truth”. We’ll see.

From the London Telegraph:

The film sets out to prove a cover-up by the “establishment” over the death of Princess Diana. It has caused outrage in sections of the British press and is not scheduled for a UK release.

Directed by actor Keith Allen and backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, father of Dodi, the film is being screened at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival on Friday.

Mr Allen describes his film as an “inquest into the inquest” of Princess Diana’s death. Of the controversial photo, Mr Allen wrote in the Daily Mail: “The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock.

“It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.”

Director Keith Allan about his documentary in The Guardian

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won’t get to see
My documentary about the Diana inquest will be shown everywhere but the UK. Here’s why

The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My “inquest of the inquest” film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I’d half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn’t hold an inquest into his son’s death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run “Was Diana Murdered?” pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer’s note that the Windsors were planning an “accident” to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who’d sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are “a safe pair of hands”. Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state’s interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed “biologically inexplicable” by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana’s seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of “unlawful killing” by unidentified “following vehicles”; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury’s troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we’re showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Share.

Leave a Comment

169 Comments on "New Film Shows Diana “Very Much Alive” After Car Crash"

10000

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Bumblebee
1 year 9 days ago

The woman (Diana) was able to live in another house with another man without the knowledge of the public for how long??? I have more than considered Diane and her new bo, or possibly her relationship with him was entirely made up, had made the decision to bow out of public, consider the divorce. Quite possible.

Livi
1 year 28 days ago
I honestly believe Princess Diana was murdered. Lets look at the evidence shall we? The note, the explosion heard at the site, the cameras that were mysteriously off or not working, the mysterious white Fiat that was at the scene, according to eyewitness accounts that has mysteriously disappeared. The fact that it took a little over an hour to get to the hospital when it should have taken MUCH LESS than that. Coincidence? I THINK NOT! The paparazzi were not even there at the crash site. They chased Diana's car, then the car got away from them, then the paparazzi… Read more »
Graham John Baker
1 year 5 months ago
In my view I personally think Lady Diana is alive and well as is dodi a lot of celebrities do fake their deaths in order to escape the lime light in some cases the celebrity is in serious debt and owes hundreds of thousands of pounds if not millions to someone or an organisation such as a bank or other company etc and all too often the moment the celebrity has supposedly popped his or her clogs then all of a sudden all their merchandise mommorbelia suddenly sells like hot cakes and all of a sudden the amount of money… Read more »
Mommi Poppins
2 years 8 months ago

I know princess Diana would like monogrammed Holiday Inn cookies. Make sure you ask before you check in. Some locations don't have the cookies. She would also like the Charlie Brown Cafe. If you are still alive wear a mask and try these items.

Angela
2 years 11 months ago

Here's the link to watch the documental online. Sorry about my english. Greetings from the Dominican Republic.

Magic
3 years 1 month ago

SO WHEN & WHERE CAN WE BUY OR SEE THIS FILM??

CHRIS
3 years 1 month ago

DO NOT WORRY MY FRIEND UNLAWFUL KILLING WILL BE SHOW TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC I WILL AS MANY OTHERS HAVE POST IT ON MY YOUTUBE AND FACEBOOK VIDEOS AND PUT LINKS TO IT EVERYWHERE I CAN, BTW IT IS A BRILLIANT DOCUMENTARY SO ANYONE THAT READS THIS WATCH IT SHOULD BE AIRED ON MAINSTREAM TV BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT WILL EVER HAPPEN, WAS DIANA MURDERED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT, DAM RIGHT SHE WAS THE COVER UP, AND SUBSEQUENT INQUEST WAS A CIRCUS AFFAIR, SHAME ON BRITISH JUSTICE

heath
4 years 9 months ago
i remember it very well , it was early in the morning and i was talking to my girlfriend on the phone when it popped up on the news , i saw her alive and smoking a cigerete with a small ambulance lady , they where walking in and out the back of the ambulance and checking on dodi in the back of the car , the news said dodi was dead and diana had a bad cut on her thigh , but i saw her walking about ? did anybody else see this ? i know my girlfiend did… Read more »
Mortimer
4 years 10 months ago

Does anyone know of any place where to see this documentary ?

Venger
4 years 10 months ago

Did anyone hear the rumour about Diana being embalmed??

Is it true?

And isn't embalming illegal in France?

the watchful
4 years 11 months ago

wow i wonder if the same will happen to kate middleton,

and what a coincidence that dodi and is father died on the same night??i never knew that..

Mac
4 years 11 months ago

Who knows what really happened in that tunnel …..???

Jack
4 years 11 months ago

Whether or not she died in that car accident I truly believe the queen (I refuse to capitalize the q) had something to do with her death, and people go around bowing and worhiping her, it's disgusting to watch.

Yahweh
5 years 23 hours ago

Muslims view Jesus/Yeshua as a prophet, just like Mohammed.

The real Yeshua was a Palestinian. Which also explains a lot.

And he was agains religions and governments. And he even told the truth like it is, about Mother Earth and Father Sun, Sound and Light (electrons and atoms, per pure definition).

Oh, and Satan was just Hebrew a word for sickness, and christ meant clean…

Check out the Essene Gospel of Peace.

Only thing that might save the world.

Anila
5 years 2 days ago
I obviously think that Diana was rather murdered in this fatal car accident. I felt bad for her since she was being put through this pressure of having had to be like one of the Royals. She was a beautiful and honest woman, she was herself and she went against everything that the Royals established. After doing tons of research on her, I learned that she was brought up just to marry Prince Charles.On August 31st 2005, which was the eighth anniversary of Diana’s death, the major questions still have not been answered, in fact the public now believe overwhelmingly… Read more »
Tenoch
5 years 3 days ago

beware of the spybloggers! those dirty rats

Allan
5 years 3 days ago

I've known people at crash sites who were alert and talking after the crash, but then died. In those cases, it was internal bleeding.

DJ
5 years 4 days ago

I will be watching. I have always believed she was murdered too. Diana was a threat to the Royal Family because she was her own woman and went against everything the establishment represented. Didn't this "accident" happen shortly after she divorced Charles?

lee mack
5 years 5 days ago

the minute she died i knew she had been murdered. a beautiful girl, naive and lost in an old established FIRM….from the start she was made to feel insignificant, she became/was a loose cannon as she hurtled through fog…..i dont believe she was murdered by royalty but by fanatical loyalists…(Echo's and reminiscent of : 'WHO WILL RID ME OF THIS TURBULANT PEST") reverberate in my ears

Darling Di rest in peace ….THEY didnt want a muslim so close to the british throne and future king!e

5 years 6 days ago
In truth i think Diana was killed for several reasons. 1. She was a sexaholic. She had slept around like a dog in heat with several people from her horse trainer to her doctor to her attendant, mostly at the same time. She was giving a bad name to the royal family. 2. She then had the audacity to question the royal family and attempt to drag their name in the mud, plus essentially make Charles broke by collecting everything from him in the divorce proceedings. All this while, she became the darling of the media and used the media… Read more »
joanna
4 years 11 months ago

A very strange comment.

dina
5 years 5 days ago

Still her murder isn't justified. The media is owned by them, they could easily ignore her and stop reporting her shenanigans. The whole thing has a nasty stench and there are no excuses in my book to murder her, whoever did it.

severalminds
5 years 6 days ago
learnsomething23 thank you for consideration. I do agree with your comments answering to the people who try to help the conflict between the one-god religions. Actually this is a part of illuminati plans – ro devide and empire, create conflicts between the one god religions in order to make confusion and feed the hate – the best food of evil… as i said before it is not about islam or christianism apart, but THEY are against all the motheistic religions…there is no problem for christians in islamic countries, furthermore, the christians are respected a lto by muslim people as those… Read more »
Voice of Reason
5 years 6 days ago

I agree…and what's up with all of the 'May 21st is Doomsday' crap? Who's funding all of that? I'm not sure how many people are part of that group, but their new vans look very expensive, and their extensive billboard/ad campaign can't have been cheap. Yet, from what I've read, most of these people didn't sell their homes and belongings to finance this…they just walked away from their stuff.

This makes me wonder if the whole mess was financed by the Illuminati, in yet another attempt to discredit Christianity; by portraying Christians as delusional, egotistical weirdos.

Just Wondering
5 years 6 days ago
Ýou know, everytime I hear that some politician, star, or whatever popular person get´s accused of something I think "What did they do to get check mated?" Like Strauss-Kahn who is head of the IMF, and now being accused of rape by a maid. Who knows what he did wrong to the "elite" to get pushed off the plank. I honestly doubt that the 62 yearl old man tried or actually raped a hotel maid, he has all the money he needs to get any call girl or whatever luxury prostitute he wants. Not even his army of lawyers can… Read more »
severalminds
5 years 5 days ago
good observation…i also think that strauss is attacked by elite. I heard that he was a potential opposer of Sarkozy on the next elections in france… israel since it is created is always in conflict and often was called by international community to observe the rules of neighborhood, of good sense, sadly, they don't seem giving a damn to international community recomendations… i go a little off topic. Don't know if u heard about the nonsense written by some Arthur Koestler, the book is called "the13th tribe". Actually by this new false theory Koestler (jewish and ex KGB agent) wanted… Read more »
Tee
5 years 6 days ago
I remember this! The media reported the crash and I remember thinking how convenient because she had been extremely vocal about her unhappiness with the royal family and I believe she had won custody of her kids plus a settlement from Charles. Anyway, none of the news outlets reported any kind of fatal injuy. In fact they said the opposite, they said she was just being taken to hospital with minor injuries, some said she might need surgery. I went to bed. By the next morning she was dead! WTF?? I knew then she was murdered! Her death did not… Read more »
Bella
5 years 6 days ago

There's no question she was murdered. Royalty, hollywood, the social elite are just one dark sinister group. Unless they repent, they will have to answer to Jesus for the sins they committed. No one guess away with sin. No one.

Alba Douek
5 years 6 days ago
It is a fact that Diana's family had a better lineage than Charle's. Now, we all know that the terrible "puzzle" regarding her death still remains unfinished. There are still far too many pieces which did not fall into places- not even by pushing here or stretching there! Not one of the important questions has been answered in a satisfactory way…and we should NOT STOP until we get those answers! Charles and Camila, in other circumstances, have what I could call a forbidden, beautiful and maybe true/undying love… My romantic side could even find excuses for their lives apart (she… Read more »
wpDiscuz