New Film Shows Diana “Very Much Alive” After Car Crash


One of the first articles I’ve published on Vigilant Citizen was “Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning” which describes the  events and the symbolism relating to the ritual sacrifice of Lady Di. While most people still buy the official “accident” story, evidence mounts that an accident was not the cause of Diana’s death, but was actually a set up leading to her murder.

A new film entitled Unlawful Killing (to be released everywhere except the UK) will apparently be showing a pictures of Diana right after the accident…still alive and not dying. Furthermore, the movie will show Diana predicting the circumstances of her death.The movie is backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, the father of Diana’s fiancé who also died that night.

Unlawful Killing will probably not dwell on the occult and ritualistic side of things. It remains, after all, a mass media production. When cover-ups are too sloppy and evidence begin piling disproving them, limited concessions are made to quell the public’s questions. This movie might be a limited concession, where part of the big ugly truth is revealed in order to protect the “bigger uglier truth”. We’ll see.

From the London Telegraph:

The film sets out to prove a cover-up by the “establishment” over the death of Princess Diana. It has caused outrage in sections of the British press and is not scheduled for a UK release.

Directed by actor Keith Allen and backed by Mohamed al-Fayed, father of Dodi, the film is being screened at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival on Friday.

Mr Allen describes his film as an “inquest into the inquest” of Princess Diana’s death. Of the controversial photo, Mr Allen wrote in the Daily Mail: “The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock.

“It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.”

Director Keith Allan about his documentary in The Guardian

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won’t get to see
My documentary about the Diana inquest will be shown everywhere but the UK. Here’s why

The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My “inquest of the inquest” film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I’d half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn’t hold an inquest into his son’s death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run “Was Diana Murdered?” pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer’s note that the Windsors were planning an “accident” to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who’d sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are “a safe pair of hands”. Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state’s interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed “biologically inexplicable” by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana’s seat belt had not been working. And so on.

Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of “unlawful killing” by unidentified “following vehicles”; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury’s troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we’re showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.



  1. Liam Veritas on

    I don't care what anyone says, she was murdered after the crash. I always remember when I was like 9yrs old or whatever and the news said, she was taken to hospital, with Prince Charles and the boys by her side. And I would not forget something like that. Not over the years it's changed to her dying on the scene of the crash or on the way to the hospital?? Pfft. David Icke covered this brilliantly in his 'The Biggest Secret' book, she was murdered and sacrificed on the scene. No doubt.

    • David Icke is a very confused, misinformed man.

      But you can take the meat (real information) and throw away the bones (lies and bullsh*t).

      • David Icke could see the Matrix before many others …… i went to one of his talks in London two years ago, and he was amazing, i left the venue 'wide awake' he helped me and many other's wake up! His books are also quite amazing, everything we talk about now on this site he saw and understood 20 plus years ago, he connected the dots and could see how the NWO was shaping before many of us were born. His idea's of lizards, the moon matrix, can seem far-fetched but his books give us choices and can allow our minds too be fully open to new thought's. The most amazing video i have seen with David Icke is when he addressed The Oxford Union at Oxford Uni – he has been 'pulled down' in every direction by the main-stream media but his web-site is the real news, and most often by following his site, you will see the real news months even year's before it actually happens. Free thinkers such as him is a huge benefit to our world which allows us to view without boundaries. His work covered MK-ultra, NWO, exposed deaths and Zionist Schemes before many had dared speak. The man is in the future. If you have not attend any of his events of read any of his books try not to trap him like the main-stream media, he should not be over-looked by his break-down in the early 80's.

    • "What are the main ideas of "The Biggest Secret"? Essentialy these: In secret, Earth is ruled by multi-dimensional shape-shifting space aliens, whom Icke dubbes "Aryan reptilians". Tounge in cheek (Icke is one of the few conspiracy theorists with a sense of humor), one of the chapters of the book is titled "Don't mention the reptiles!". Icke believes that the British royal family, many US presidents, Henry Kissinger and even one Mexican president are reptilians who shape-shift to look human. He explicitly compares this to the TV show "V". These evil beings are behind all the world's religions, materialist science, most wars and financial crises, and globalization. The goal is to create a global, evil superstate. The space aliens thrive on hatred, conflict and guilt. Therefore, the solution to the conspiracy is not warfare against them, but a New Age message of Love and Forgiveness. Perhaps this will release even the reptilians in the end. "

      looked up some reviews on this book and this is what I found. Sounds like a bunch of BS. Im sure he exposes the evil in this world very thoroughly but the fact that he is tying it down to fucking reptiles? what the hell.. shut up LOL. how about Satan.. its a war between Satan and his angels versus God.

      • Icke is weirdo. He either has an agenda or he lost the plot. He sensationalises, sugar coats the evil psychopaths as he presents them as something from a different dimension. There are simple evil, twisted sociopaths who work for Satan and his minions. The demons probably possess the physical bodies of them via their rituals (blood drinking, sacrifices), they surely come in contact with evil spirits.

      • It sounds like that psychic "healer" he saw really effed him up.

        A troubled man indeed.

      • For those who say that its BS (David Icke's theory) but yet think its Satan/Demons against GOD/Angels take a minute and think …. The Aliens/Reptiles are the Demons/Satan. When you think of demons how do you envision the texture of their skin ? With Scales !!!

        " They Live and We Sleep, You Starve and They Eat !!! "


      • i'm convinced in order to even get away with his shows/books/videos he prob was told he better have something in there to make him look crazy/lose credibility.

        the queen is an evil mason witch. the end.

      • resurrected on

        I have seen things that don't always look normal on the TV but we are so preoccupied we never know what we are really seeing. We are very greedy and self indulgence everyone is acting like money has more value then them and human life. Power is the poison for the rich but they never use it properly other then to make the mass there sheep.

        I have always wonder how does the boys feel about there mother death and what they do know about there family. It like they never had deep love for her. I could never marry into royalty because who wants to give life just to put the control of that life into other people hands. A child is a power weapon of mass manipulation when aware and intellectual adults don't seem to do there best to look out of the children.

        We love to get caught up in these fantasies of lies and deception on to see that now you are really in danger.

      • I agree. Icke might have a few things accurate, but the so called aliens aren't aliens they are demons, but the world keeps calling them aliens, I don't get it. Its true the NWO has most of these belief systems (leaders) under their control, and a few so called christian organizations but most of Christianity isn't under their control, you can tell by all the attacks that they have on Christianity, the question should be why are they attacking Christianity so much? Its obvious, these guys are devil worshipers and they hate God & humans, though human join them??? Im glad a movie like this is coming out, someones gotta tell the world the truth.

    • I totally remember that too Liam! I was like eleven/ twelve, and the news said she had a broken arm and was being taken to the hospital, it was a fact. I would never forget that… then just minutes later she was dead on the scene..

    • I totally agree, and I really hate it when people simply say 'Icke is crazy' – that's too easy. He really does connect the dots, and although you have to take what he says with a pinch of salt as he has a tendency to sensationalise things, he generally is on the right path. Everything is energy and vibrations, and his knowledge of metaphysics really does add credence to his reptilian theories, even modern-day physicists say that different dimensions exist at different frequencies, and aliens can move between these frequencies, ie shapeshift. Icke links history, politics, science, spirituality and religion like nobody's business, he should be taken far more seriously than he is. The Diana murder is explained by him in such a way that you really can see clearly how it was done and why, in the same way that 9-11 was an inside job. The media are evil compliant puppets of the government and establishment and the more people that wake up to this the better.

    • We live in a world that sincerely believes Diana was murdered to the benefit of the Royal Family, Camilla and specifically Charles.

      I believe The Royal Family, specifically the Queen, Charles and Camilla should be held to account and fully investigated without reference to their "positions in society".

      Did the Queen actually believe that the public wouldn't notice her cold shoulder and indifference after Diana died? Honestly. Historically, those of "royal" blood killed members of their own families to stay in power. An assassination is not as far-fetched as we wish it were. Nothing else adds up.

      They are only people, and are no greater than the least of the population. All they have is more money, and that is it.

    • I believe The public will not accept an adulterous, and possibly murderous prince or Royal Family's "establishment" as ruler. the events surrounding the crash.supports murder in a no-nonsense, concrete manner. after all the "official" junk is out of the way it appears to be murder. There is more motive than there is money in the treasury.
      .I sincerely believe that this is proof that money and power certainly buy neither class, conscience nor morals. The Queen will eventually die, so will her brood so those responsible will have to answer to the ultimate judge, who knows and sees all that they have done.

    • Diana was NOT taken to the hospital , with Prince Charles and the boys by her side!!!! I do believe that she was alive after the accident and whilst in the ambulance…The stopping of the ambulance for many many minutes, and someone seen coming onto the ambulance, begs investigation, apart from all else!
      IMO, Diana was killed because of her friendship with Al Fayed,himself, her romantic interest in the son, and her political stance with the buried mines. She also had a commitment from Bill CLinton and in the Oct ( or Nov) meeting in the Netherlands regarding these mines, he would back her and NOT sign against their usage. Diana and was killed and Bill Clinton reneged on his promise of backing Diana and her views.
      Also I believe and remember what Her Majesty told the butler…. about being careful, cause there were "dark forces out there"! She knows!!

    • I was 17, and glued to the news with my dad. we did not come across one single news report, or article stating that she was taken to the hospital with her family. Diana, and Charles had already moved on from their marriage, and on top of that Diana was dating Dodi Fayed, which was seen by the Royal Family as a huge embarrassment. Charles uptight public persona would not have allowed him to rush by her side. Also Diana was in France at the time, Charles, and their sons were in Scotland with the Queen at Balmoral. By the time they would have made it to the hospital, the news was already reporting Dianas' death. Perhaps it was reporter error that you heard. I remember it so clearly, to me, as a girl that grew up in the 80's, she was a living Disney princess, my mother, and grandmother followed everything she did through out her life. I remember her death seemed so bizarre! I remember seeing a picture of her in the car after the crash, and she was still seated, and looking up at the photographer as he snapped the picture. She looked totally awake. But I only saw it that one time, and never again.

    • lindsay molynwux on

      When I saw the newsflash about two in the morning they said she was fine just a broken leg and was being taken to hospital and then she suddenly died , the royal family have blood on thier hands they are legal murders as no fuker will do anything about it

      • Given the fact that she wasn't pregnant for 3 years, when she first told others that she had been threatened, I think that the possibility of her being pregnant was very low, if any.

        It is more possible to believe that she simply DID NOT agree with the common Illuminati goals and wanted out of the game. Or she simply knew too much about the royalty for them to let her scape unharmed.

      • Not necessarily!! There were many reasons Diana had to be killed! Had she selected to live a quiet life, out of the media and settled for some English white earl, say, there would have been no killing! As long as the establishment and palace control her in someway. I also blame AL Fayed for his wanting to be part of the British Elite society and when he was snubbed by those, then he cozied up to a disallouisened(*) Diana and showed her what she could have if she accepted him and his son and family!. I also believe that , once back in England and meeting up with William, (Harry) she would have had second thoughts about her romance, as Diana was against drugs and between that view and the Palaces view, she would have ended the romance sooner then later. I also don't believe she was preggers…That was malicious gossip , hoping the public would go against her popularity!..

    • I think at least williams had an idea bout his moms murder as he was kind of close to her….i think they loved their mom. If she was loved by the public she must've been loved by her sons. The problem is williams probably thought 'what can i do?' after all the windsors control the boys they'v most certainly brainwashed them too especially after the crime. Williams and harry have moved on and got all the professional shrinks to help them during their instability.

    • I completely agree with you…I believe behind close doors William and Harry hate the royal family. But keep there mouth shut because it might happen to them. Why Harry became buck wild and party all the time. Just to get out of the place…..And then Diana dies and Charles married Camille…..She ( Camille) seems that is willing to do anything to sell her soul

  2. I will watch this!! She was a decent person, but obviously too "common" (as they call it) for the royal family.

    No doubt there is a connection with the Illuminati.

    R.I.P Diana

    • Quite the opposite, Diana was chosen as a bride for Charles by his family because of her pedigree, she was a daughter of one of the most 'noble' earldoms in the U.K. It was only when Charles couldn't keep away from Camilla, who he had been banned from marrying, that Diana became very depressed and began to lose her grip and act out. She became the 'nuisance' of the family because she was sensitive and craved affection, and her husband simply wasn't interested. It was when they fell apart for good that the Royal family began to conspire to drag her reputation through the mud and ruin her credibility (see 'Squidgygate'), but when Diana decided not to lay down and fought back and became more popular than any of them.. well, we all know the rest…

  3. vigilant girl on

    this same situation happens every day in the life of many women. The calls and cries for help go unheeded, even with more than sufficient evidence. I look forward to seeing this..

  4. I can't wait to see this!!!! I always knew something was up with that. Its about time people started speaking out about it.

    Can I just say for the record Pippa Middleton, better be careful with all the attention she is attracting, I don't think the queen is impressed with her. #imjustsaying

  5. First of all, I admit that I am not very well researched into this sorta thing, and I barely remember the incident (I was 5 at the time) but the film was financed by Al-Fayed. All I'm saying is, no one can take anything said to be absolutely true, as it's bound to be absolutely biased.

    I'm not commenting on what really happened to Lady Di, it's just this film isn't likely to be fair evidence. Al-Fayed isnt likely to allow anyone to appear in the film if they refuted what the film was saying.

    Maybe unrelated, but I dislike how the director claimed that he expects the film to sell well in America, where conspiracy theories about the incident are popular. That makes me think he's not being too serious about the subject, and just willing to make some money.

    Of course, I may be wrong. But I don't mind tbh

    • Good points there, CB! Also, I think a lot of people are way too willing to just accept really bold conspiracy theories. It's dangerous thinking, we need a healthy dose of skepticism towards what mainstream media tells us AND what underground media tells us. No one is credible just because they say so.

      • @Disgusted : "I don’t think it’s a war on Islam. I’m sorry, but as a veteran I have to say we bend over backwards to accomodate these people. They’re allowed free expression of their religious observances and dress without discrimination, regardless of how it might interfere with a typical work week. Schools across the nation are now having “Discovering Islam” weeks and the like; meanwhile, Walmarts can’t play traditional Christmas songs referencing Christ because it might “offend” someone."

        I don't particularly think it's a religion thing all the time, sometimes it just seems to be MidEast against America, and Islam is just a device. I must say, I have not seen any of these so-called accommodations, as a Muslim I would have noticed. I don't really see anyone refraining from playing Christmas song in malls. Ever. That's just absurd. Why do all Americans say 'Muslims might get offended?', especially if they haven't seen any of us express offence. If we don't like Christmas, we'll just stay at home, it's no big deal. I don't see our malls and Markets celebrating Ramadan or Eid yet they celebrate Christmas and Hanukkah despite the fact there are way more Muslims here than Jews OR Christians. Nobody's complaining. If turning off music in some mall, and encouraging students to understand religion better is considered negative accommodation of Muslims then…wow. You're a tough bunch. Pray, what would YOU consider a method that encourages integration?

        "Despite Muslim’s sometimes open disdain for the United States, they are allowed to come here, get educated, and rise to positions of great authority over others. Not to mention the mosque built a few blocks from the Twin Towers memorial–nice touch."

        I agree, if some show immense disdain, they shouldn't be there. But you're assuming (again) that all Muslims are immigrants and foreigners and come from somewhere else. I live in the U.K, I pay taxes, my ancestors were born here, I don't come from overseas. If I don't like my country, I don't. I don't have any reason to. I don't see why I should bow down and shut up because I'm Muslim and people are being nice by 'accepting' me. I'm from here and I'm not allowed to express my opinion? The only people I see in great positions of authority (no offence) are Jews. I don't see anyone else becoming rich because of their religion. I'm not even going to touch the 'mosque' because that's just a pathetic attempt, you're obviously ill informed on the issue.

        "Do you think that any Christian could go over to the Middle East, state they are a Christian openly, and be afforded the same benefits? Neither do I."

        Yes. Lol. Have you been to Aramco in the Eastern Province? In SAUDI. Where appraentally everyone gets slaughtered for just being.

        I have, I lived there. A majority of rich, white people there. They have their church, they live alongside other Muslims and generally people form different countries and they never, ever get trouble for their religion or race.

        Have you been to Dubai?

        People who wouldn't even get jobs as waiters here, get high-end jobs over there. Why?

        Because they're white, simple as.

        Have you been to Lebanon, Syria, or even Turkey? They're all in the middle east.

        All my Lebanese friends are Christians. In fact, Lebanon is a very good example of two religions co-existing in peace. You should go there, see what it's like before believing what you're told.

        I don't think you have very valid points at all, they just all seem personal, and you don't sound very Christian either.

    • "Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck."

      Unless you dont believe hes telling the truth…

  6. Diana was murdered post the crash hence the delay of 1hr 45 mins to get her to the hospital – God knows what they did to this woman. Look and listen to her in the video "If you want to be like me, then you have to suffer to get what you want…no perhaps what you deserve"….

    I heard she also professed an interest in Islam and actually was in love with Dr Hasnat Khan, a Pakistani heart surgeon who was more than likely threatened to back off.

    Do you notice how all the monotheistic religions have been attacked, changed, infiltrated – and why do you think the elite despite the Muslim religion so much? If they are satanic which is without doubt, does this not beg the question then what does Islam mean to them and why such satanic people are against it?

    I found The Arrivals really enlightening…check it out on and scroll down on the right hand side. It is in three sections. Watch them all, be patient and see the the reality…

    • I don't hear much about the elite being against Islam, but against muslim period, like a big chunk of the world period. The most attacked religious leader ever is Jesus, no doubt about that.

      • No, it's Islam. Anyone who watches T.V can tell you that. America is in Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Probably want to wage war on Iran too. These are all muslim countries. Terrorists are doing their crap in the name of 'Islam'. 'Muslim' women in France are banned from wearing the Burqa. ect, ect. It's a war on Islam, not Christianity, not Judaism, regardless of Jesus.

        The Lanclet study suggests that around about 655,000

      • Iraqi's were killed up until the end of June 2006. That was 5 years ago, it's probably around about 1.2 million now. Without counting Libya or Afghanistan. So you see, figures say it all. Anyway, according to the studies, there's a large margin of error, and these figures are likely to be a great underestimate.

        Damn everything, why is okay for nearly 2million people to die for the 9/11 just because they're not American/English/Western? They're actually ensuring more terrorists are born because if my family were blown to kingdom come for no reason by American or British troops and I was naive and angry, then that's the final straw. I'd go to the nearest training camp to get even. :/

      • I think its all religions whatever feeds your sole and gives you a higher purpose opens your eyes and gives you the strength to fight for your religion and know there is an after life and whatever they control they only get this life .

        but of course they have special hatred and content and fear from Islam

      • learnsomething23 on


        The U.S. is not a CHRISTIAN state, it is an immigrant country. How can you say that WE have accomodated THEM. America is SUPPOSED to be a country for anybody of any background it is not a country for white christians that is why anybody can come here and anybody here can practice any faith because its a free country. And saying that THEY( as in the Muslims) do not like the U.S. shows how uneducated you really are, generally most of the world has a hatred for America for always interfering with their country. Most Muslims dont have a care in the world for America, they have their own struggles. And most muslims in the u.s. are the second generation who were born here and raised american they dont consider themselves anything else but American.

        Go to Lebanon go to syria you can practice any faith you want, you can choose to wear a headscarf as a muslim or wear shorts nobody cares. there are so many Muslims in the world there are so many sects within Islam you cannot bundle them all up into one group and assume they are all exactly the same. you wouldnt like it if people compared all french people to white people in america and said they are exactly the same BECAUSE THEIR NOT so why do people do this with muslims? you wouldnt like it if people judged a lutheran harshly because of actions a mormon commited would you? then take time out think about what your saying and how offensive it can be to muslims. Saudi Arabia and other countries you may think would treat a christian harshly is because their laws are not secular, they are exteremly strict and follow only one sect of Islam, they dont even accomodate for other groups of Muslims, they hate on the Shi'ite muslims they hate on the Ismaili and many different groups of muslims.

        BACK TO THE POINT I really feel for princess Diana, I do think she became very rebellious and strong and wanted to protect herself and her sons from the royal family's occult way of life. I also feel like poor william had an arranged marriage to kate, i dont think they are really together to be honest. thats sad

      • Disgusted pt. deux on

        @ Learnsomething

        This is a predominantly Christian nation, and it was based on Christian values. You may not like it but sorry, that's the way it is. Of course I think people should be able to practice what they believe (as long as it's safe and sane), however observing my original post, again, I said that we are going out of our way to observe their practices these days, while giving no credence to our own. This is for the sake of being politically correct.

        Explain to me, if you can, why a Walmart cannot play traditional Christmas music because it might offend someone, but in the spirit of embracing diversity we have Muslim Week on campus or a push to build a mosque so close to the twin towers? THOSE are the kind of small gestures I'm talking about, the overaccomodating. In my opinion, it borders on an abuse of the United State's generosity.

        Some Muslims are cool, sure, I'm not saying they're all bad. But I knew one recently (a native of Lebanon) who was openly making anti-American statements and seemed to have a prejudice towards Americans. Why doesn't she just return to her own country, if she doesn't like it so much? Oh yeah, because the U.S. is better to her than she'd ever openly admit. She wouldn't have half the prestige and rights to power/education in her native land, and she knows it.

        On second part, I don't think William and Kate are set up together, I think they're happy and the genuine thing. And no, I'm not trolling.

      • learnsomething23 on

        @ disgusted

        America belonged to native americans! who were raped murdered massaccred cheated and ultimately ethnically cleansed, it does not belong to the white man. You have never been discriminated against, having some RANDOM girl say she doesnt like america has nothing to do the Muslim people as a whole… gee let me think, one time a white boy called me a nigger, so i suppose all white people are racist then? according to your logic this makes sense.

        You did not originate from America either you are also a descendent of immigrants, OBVIOUSLY! maybe you should go back to scotland, ireland, france wherever the hell you originate from.<– rude isnt it?

        the point of this website is to open your mind up, sadly it seems that you are here to spew hate. you seem like you dont want to listen to other peoples opinions you just want to fight and ignore EVERYTHING i said previously. I am not here to hate on anybody the topic was about Diana and I do believe that she was rebelling by being with a Muslim man, it doesnt matter if he practiced his faith or cared about it at all, many people have very bad views about the Islamic faith. for your information Im not even a muslim but regardless I choose to love all people and fight against hatred of all sorts. this is the behavior that killed Diana, living an honest life!

      • Wow, touchy much?

        You obviously haven't listened to a thing I've said, or the logic behind it. Sounds like you are spewing quite a bit of hate yourself with all the YELLING and attempts to insult my intelligence level. We're done here.

    • The Illuminati seem to attack any religion that produces faithful wise individuals, they want us to be hopeless.

      Anyways I too think that The Arrivals is a great series, but I wonder why the makers of these videos 'retired' …

      • there are rumors that the zionists hacked and closed their website. the also received death threats in riddles under the name of "cyhpher". they are retired due to safety concern..

      • severalminds on

        i agree, the satanist leaders attack all the one God religions (monotheism). Just note that there are no attacks, no problems, no conspirations with the religions which don't recognise unique God (did anybody ever see any puppet "monster" of buddhism, taoism etc. to be created by the sevìcret services???). The satanic serves behind the curtains always try to spoil the unique God believers, to show the unique God religions as something barbaric, dangerous, low level and ignorant thing, in this purpose they organise false terroristic attacks, false terroristic organisations based on one God religions. Because the devil hates the people who believe in unique, true God. That's why cristianism and islam are attacked so much. Those who ignorantly believe in many gods or material things are ok for devil doctrine which is based on deny of unique God. Just see how the masons infiltrated into the church try to spoil its name, making appear all the christian priests as pedophiles…the false priests infiltrated into the church abused the children, it was a big plan prepared in advance…why no mass media speak about the satanist sects, their rituals, their sacrifieses, the children kidnapped by them? you see, it is like a parallel, untouchable world for mass media which is not allowed to talk about these satanic crimes…so many serial killers did what they did in the name of evil, but the mass media was ordered to keep silence on it, they presented those killers just as obsessed maniacs, nothing else…

        i think Diana was going on with muslim lovers in order to revenge against the royal family, Charles which in some way betrayed and offended her, so she was answering with offence to offence…her lifestyle of last years was a kind of protest…

      • learnsomething23 on

        @ severalminds

        your comment is beautiful. I totally agree, whenever you watch t.v. everytime they show a christian who has any form of faith they always make them out to be crazy fools or judgemental assholes. wat the hell? I watched that movie EASY A about that girl who pretended to have sex and be a slut because she liked the attention in school and Amanda Bynes was playing a christian girl and they made her look like a total idiot. For some reason even though everybody else was so unethical they were portrayed to just be silly and fun but the christian girl looked like a judgemental freak. Also the movie SAVEd was so awful they did the same thing with mandy moore in it. Hollywood and the media are very very anti- one god.

    • You're right! Its so obvious that the elite are attacking Islam. And that is coz some Muslims are not bowing to the them and they'r holding on strong to their religion or at least keeping it pure from fabrication etc. The elite is striving to get people away from that sort of thing you know to worship the Creator. Their agendas dont go together with any of the monothestic religions but sadly many christians and muslims have accepted their mind games. These people dont care much as long as they get what they desire which is what the elite is presented in form of glamour $$$, media, fashion etc. The jewish zionists are part of the elite already. Non zionist israeli jews are different though.

      Not only did Diana fall in love with Khan but she was later engaged to an Egyptian man, he may have not been a practising Muslim but he was a Muslim in name. That was proabably the elites nightmare. And no matter how many people reject the idea of Diana being interested in Islam its still a fact through her actions.

      The Arrivals have some interesting facts but its over dramatic dont u think? I personally dont like videos with music in the background for the intention of scaring audience and get their attention. But overall its good.

    • @K

      Thank you for insight into the Quran but I thought I'd share a little more about the Bible:

      1) The Bible was written by over 40 authors throughout 1500 years.

      2) It is the most circulated book in history.

      3) The Bible is unique in its scientific accuracy. It foretold of the properties of our Universe far before the Quran or othe scientific discoveries.

      4)The Bible is the only religious text to contain over 1800 prophecies fortelling the future. None have been false. No other religious text will do this because just one false prophecy will negate the entire text.

      5) Over 23,000 acheological digs have been done to try to prove the Bible false. To date, not one has been successful!

      Conclusion: It is a collection of historical documents written by eye witnesses among other eye witnesses to document the supernatural events of God's redemption of man.

      • @AD

        it might seem to you cause Quran is a great book and muslims and non muslims have committed on that

        but what you dont know is that Muslims believe in the bible also that it is a book of god and prophet Mohammed says not to disbelieve any part of it

        plus there are many stories in the bible and the quran that are very identicle

        what Muslims say and also Christian experts say in the bible is that some parts of the bible have been changed or added and there are so many versions under peoples names we just think that god's words needs no improvement from any person and it could cause some serous misinterpretation

        FYI to be a Muslim you have to believe in all god's books , prophets and angels

      • @Ruby

        So if you are encouraged to believe the Bible, are you also encouraged to believe that Jesus is the son of God and the only way to God? Just wondering what parts you choose to believe in since the bible is very clear that there is only one way to God.

        As for the translations, many like to use that argument to debate the validity of the bible. Some people think that the Bible was written in one language, translated to another language, then translated into yet another and so on until it was finally translated into the English. The fact is that the Bible has not been rewritten. Take the New Testament, for example. The disciples of Jesus wrote the New Testament in Greek and though we do not have the original documents, we do have around 6,000 copies of the Greek manuscripts that were made very close to the time of the originals. These various manuscripts, or copies, agree with each other to almost 100 percent accuracy. Statistically, the New Testament is 99.5% textually pure. That means that there is only 1/2 of 1% of of all the copies that do not agree with each other perfectly. But, if you take that 1/2 of 1% and examine it, you find that the majority of the "problems" are nothing more than spelling errors and very minor word alterations. For example, instead of saying Jesus, a variation might be "Jesus Christ." So the actual amount of textual variation of any concern is extremely low. Therefore, we can say that we have a remarkably accurate compilation of the original documents. Some of our most treasured texts from Plato & Aristole cannot boast the accuracy of the bible.

      • i would like to point out that Muslims and Christians have more things in common than their difference and people should focus on that so we can unite became stronger against the true enemy

      • I wish all christens would understand what @Ruby put in this link

        although as you said Christianity was here for thousands of years it was truly once a great religion the only religion but after years of change and misinterpretation of bible and the people interfering with religion who have no business interfering with religion

        Islam is just a more updated revised specific strong version of Christianity from god and his final prophet that is good till the end if time it is not something that is against or the opposite of Christianity

  7. Now i was only 12 when she was in that crash but i remember watching all tha news coverage with my Nana (yes i typed Nana IL "inside laugh" ) and thinking tha whole crash scenario seemed tainted. I very distinctively remember MSM stating that Princess Diana had arrived at the hospital almost 2 hours later N alive. A few hours later on tha same News Network (my Nana watched every News Broadcast that came on) they changed their story, saying that her crash was indeed fatal. One things for sure tho, if something bad happens to Keith Allen we'll know "some Truth". As for tha Royal Wedding N Kate Middleton, who else thinks Kate is just a Puppet for tha Prince to play wit?

    • it wouldn't be a surprise… i think they knew about it… after all they are going to inherit all the occultism in the royal… sometimes the truth is stranger and creepier than fiction!

    • I swear I have always wondered that. could they have told them it was necessary had to be done. or they dont have a clue .

  8. strange how this is coming out now that everyone's talking about prince william & kate middleton and the royal family and stuff like that..

    • The whole "every camera in the tunnel not working" is an astronimical impossibility to say the least. That, if nothing else, should give anyone who doubts she was murdered pause..

    • John Todd always advice to look into things when any of them elites do a media extravaganza,

      they are always doing something behind these big events its like a magician taking attention with his right hand and pulling rabbits from under the table with his left hand that no one is paying any attention to, misdirection brah.

  9. Thank you, VC for always bringing stuff like this to our attention! I've learned so much from your site!


    • Sorry. When I posted, for some reason, the comments didn't show up so I thought I was first. Oops. =)

  10. kyenikinene on

    “If you want to be like me, then you have to suffer to get what you want…no perhaps what you deserve”….

    So, what DID Diana want or 'deserve'? This, I suppose, is the other side of the coin of 'Diana the Victim', which becomes 'Diana the active participant' in her own suffering. For the story, please read Matthew Delooze's analysis of Diana's death.

    I applaud the courageous director for making this new movie in the face of the wall of silence imposed by the British establishment and the media, and I look forward to watching it.

    • Errrrm . . . when she made that statement she may have meant that she wanted happiness. . . and when she changed it to "deserved", what she obviously meant was that she dserved happiness after her treatment at the hands of Prince Charles.

    • Seriously! All those herky-jerky effects served only to distract and disorient. That is a technique favored by those who want to shut our thinking processes down, not by those who wish us to deeply consider the information being presented.

  11. "Why would I watch the wedding? Why would I watch it? I couldn't take any of that seriously. I don't think the so-called Royal family speak for England now, and I don't think England needs them. I do seriously believe that they are benefit scroungers, nothing else. I don't believe they serve any purpose whatsoever.

    I'm not an anarchist, but I believe that people don't want the Royal family — the so-called Royal family. They're not royal to me, but they're royal to the media for some reason.

    The press reports from Buckingham tell you that people love them, but go out and speak to people on the streets and they will laugh at you. They really will."


    • Really ? Interesting. We are so bombarded, in North America, with news about people in UK being SO loyal and loving of "their" royal family… I'm surprised Geven… maybe a little shocked of the lie we're perhaps being sold for years and that curt around anything pertaining to the royal family. It seems as if English Canada is still oh so loyal to them… is that a lie too ? I wonder…

      • canada doesnt really even think the 'royal' family is royal. the only thing here that think their royal is the media.. which is actually kind of strange..

      • It's a whole lie. None of us were interested in the wedding, take a close look at the crowd, London is extremely diverse, it's really odd that almost the whole crowd was white. Our 'happiness' and 'joy' and 'loyalty' was assumed. On all of our bus stops in our area someone posted these posters that were titled 'Cut the wedding budget not the public services', they were really large with a picture of William and Kate on it. Later on the were all ripped off, and I wish I'd taken a picture. The wedding0the whole wedding was a headache, really. Too much traffic and everything, and all this bullshit about her being a commoner, when they met at some rich college.

      • Canada has a very good reason to be involved. The government are 'loyalists', the royal family even has a say in government. Here is a neat site about Canada

        HMCS – Her Majesty's Canadian Ship —The whole Canadian fleet is labled/branded royal family

    • they are royal to media…i'm so fed up with all the yahoo news.. everyday, there will be so many things to tell about the royals…even the so unimportant and silliest ones that people don't really care…

      • I'm british and I hate the inbred scroungers, every fucker does except for a few old bats who line the streets every time one of the twats marries their own sister or whatever

    • Robin Shadowes on

      Royal my arse. The Windsors are all Illuminati scumbuckets and should be sent to the Hague for prosecution for crimes against humanity.

      • Fvcking nasteee pasteeesss all of them. If you knew the brainwashing starts in schools in the UK, still they have only a few admirers. People woke up and smelt the coffee finally. And whoever said they are constantly on the news is right. I can't even log on, they come on my lappy screen. As far as I'm concerned they can do one. My dad is a royalist and there is no way he will change. He's been brainwashed for a long time, too late.

        And the palabra about Diana is nonsensical. If the media is their pawn, why they gave her so much positive media time in the past. Diana was either consciously a part of their game or they simply had a bigger plan to hype her son via her hype if you know what I mean. I felt sorry for her as I feel sorry for all the folks they bomb and kill in Libya.

    • severalminds on

      nice comment…actually i didn't watch the royal wedding and i'm asking myself how in XXI century in the world may exist the royal families, monarchies, especially in so called democratic, modern countries? i can't explain to myself how the english people is still there to pay the crazy taxes in order to keep so madly expensive family which has no reason and importance in UK politics with all their extremely expensive, useless cerimonies, servants, properties, gardens etc…it is really so bizard…

      strangely the most of monarchies are in so called modern, democratic european countries while so called "third countries" have their elected presidental system…there are really few monarchies in third countries…

      • Not So Royal on

        You know, it was estimated that 2billion people from all four corners of the globe would watch it. How many really did? Just 25 million – that is, if you believe everything you hear from the news. Even that, I find difficult to believe.

  12. she was obviously murderer!.. i mean the note, the cameras "not working", the explosion heard when the car crashed…. it is fenomenal how people with power can get away with murderer

  13. It's true that sitting ducks AKA general population in England and the UK in general don't like the Royals, they don't know how to get rid of them or they're just terrified to speak out. I have personal experience on the matter. It's just media hype. Can't say more though even if you don't take my word into consideration.

    The Greatest Spiritual Energy Extraction Scam of the 20th Century

    By Matthew Delooze

    Just step back from the pathetic hype that surrounded Diana for a moment and you will see that she was simply ‘groomed’ to become a massive pied piper. As soon as she started appearing in the media she was never out of it. The entire media cartel hyped Diana constantly, so please ask yourself why this was so as I’m sure most of you reading this article are aware that the illuminati control all mainstream media? Do you honestly thing the illuminati controlled media couldn’t have made Diana in to whatever they wanted? A scrubber? A lunatic? A paranoid drama queen? You name it they could have done it to her but they didn’t. Why was this so? Don’t tell me it was the will of the masses…. please.

    read below

  14. I saw the trailer for this movie and I really want to see it. I've always believed that she was murdered, never that it was just an accident. Have to get my hands on a copy of this film somehow. Thanks as always for your work VC

  15. Im still trying to consume the story years back,

    they said it was the paparazzi's fault for not helping them when the crash happened,

    how does the paparazzi's play into this

  16. It really surprises me that none of the Diana conspiracies look at Dodi's link to Adnan Khashoggi (his uncle). Khashoggi was the primary arms dealer in Iran Contra. Daniel Hopsicker (in Welcome to Terrorland) reveals that Khashoggi also had links to 911 – as co-owner of the Florida flight school where 3 of the hijackers trained in aero-terrorism. Khashoggi is also linked to the murder of investigative journalist Danny Casolaro (who was about to expose him for his involvement in BCCI and the Promis software scandal). Apparently even Mohammed Al Fayed believed Diana’s and Casolaro’s deaths were linked, but the CIA stonewalled his FOIA requests when he tried to prove it (see

  17. everything is becoming too clear

    there are way too many signs and unexplained clues for them too keep lying

  18. I'll just say this: I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if one of those expose' films come out in a decade or so concerning Osama Bin Laden's "murder"…much like Princess Diana's murder, there are SO many holes in this story that people will eventually grow wise to it sooner or later.

    The more time Americans have to get over the emotion, common sense will take over.

  19. I had the displeasure of bumping into the picture of di after the crash. It's seriously traumatic. Her face completely disfigured and i mean completely. I don't even want to describe. If you plan on watching this movie be prepared – the picture will never leave your mind. Now everytime I think if diana I see that picture.

    not that I don't buy that it was an accident but it's hard for me to believe someone remained alive after that crash. she practically smashed her entire face in. It's just not possible to sray after that

    Please be adviced, these pictures are awful.

  20. anti zionist on

    i hope someone would create a documentary/movie revealing the truth behind 911, ten years after the massive massacre conspired by the elite

    and better still a documentary or movie on the current unrelentless uncovered oppression of the palestinians by the israelites… i mean c'mon im f#(<ing sick of all these WW2 + holocaust documentary/movie being created over n over again… it feels like were being indoctrinated or sth.

  21. diana was an obvious sacrifice and it's sad what happened but she's not been the only one!

    what about what is happening right now in israel…this could eventually be big…I've experienced personally the hate arabs around the world have for israel and this could turn epic quickly!! PEOPLE PRAY FOR ISRAEL!

    • You have to understand that the hate is born from israel gouvernement, they kill and destroy lives of million palestiniens for the sake of what ? Claiming they deserve the land in the name of the Tora ? Is this really a good justification ?

      Palestine has always been a country or should I say an ex- province of the Ottoman empire, once the Empire collapsed after World War1, all the provinces were promised to be independent and internationaly known as Country. However, that didn't happen, some countries regain their freedoms after many years, while other didn't.

      Did you know, jews, christians and muslims were all living peacefully in Palestine before Occidental jews were put there by UNO ? Israel could have been created anywhere around the world even in Canada, yet they decided to create the land of Israel in Palestine for many reasons such as : controlling the oil coming from Middle-East countries to restrain the economical power and political influance of China and India.

      And many more reasons…but yeah, hate won't get us no where, saddly we can't change people minds

      • I would have to disagree.. minds are the ONLY thing we can change and the only thing that by changing, will make a difference.

    • Candy is right on this one, and history supports the claims made.

      There is a great reason why things have happened and somethings are of long term planning and design.

      Israel was created to be a secular state to cause divide between the major monotheistic religions. WW3 is being primed right now and all the media hype is a lot of yellow journalism and dark propaganda to promote fear, anger, and hatred among the religions pitted against each other.

      At the same time, this gives greater credance to the atheist's position that "religion is the root of all evil', that monotheism is a psychiatric disorder "The God Delusion", and to expose the hypocrisy of blind religious followers who drop the Love of neighbor and instead become the wicked mob under a rallying cry of anger, fear and under the false pretense of God.

      Israel is a secular state. Zionism and Judaism are entirely two different things, but if you ever watch the news they are always linked. In the USA mainstream if one speaks anything negative towards Israel (Zionism), they are immediately labled 'antisemitic' (if non-jewish) or 'self hating jew' (if jewish). Once that person is labled- they are discredited and lumped in with prejudiced and bigoted scum (even though the individual did not say anything about religion.)

      It is intellectually disingenous to blend to unlike things and sell it as a black and white issue –Bush did this a lot with his moronic slogans for war like 'your either for the troops, or for the terrorists' Can't you be for the troops because you have friends and family involved, but be against the War? Not if you buy into slogan, which is the same tactic as zionism except now its entranched by generations.

      Anyway, The hate you speak of is exactly what is being primed on all sides and promoted by the media. Monotheism will be scapegoated as the reason for all the atrocities to come and that is when the NWO will shine with a promise of enlightenment, dawn of a new age, a pheonix from the ashes, and a 'torch bearer of light' and an end to the old disease of relgion that has plagued the earth, kept humanity in the dark ages, and prevented humankind from evolving to it's fullest potential.

      Now is the time we need to Love one another more than ever.

      • Well said, I couldn't agree more, they plan on deviding us to conquer by using fear, suffering and more importently hat…after creating racism, they created neoracism : hate based on culturel origins and religious beliefs which can be spred easly and quickly via mass medias to communicate and hype the population on delusional fears as well as dumping it down…

        We can only delay the unavoidable at best, at least that is what we think but it was written for us long before we existed to experience things we can't stop nor prevant from appening such as NWO. Beside, Everything has an end same goes for their plans. After all, those idiots will experience some joy down here creating the chaos they are doing however, what awaits them after life isn't pretty the least…

  22. janie's gunn on

    I was 16 when Diana died. I distinctly remembered watching the breaking events on ABC.. I also remember ABC reporting that Diana had suffered a leg injury and was being rushed into surgery…moments later she was pronounced dead. I always wondered how did she pass from a leg injury. Now that I am older..things make more sense. This woman was murdered..

  23. I read your artical on the Diana and thought it to be very much the same as Rik Clay's (R.I.P)

    No mention of his name once in the ariticle?

    • I don't think it will be The Mark, but it will be a mark going toward that direction. The system will probably be in place (to work out the bugs) first before people start accepting or rejecting the mark by choice.

      We can't change our biometrics- that is just who we are biologically and that is what is being identified, logged in, and chategorized like a species of study. That is why I do not see this as the mark yet. It makes sense to have a biometric scan first so when people are chipped they have a tag matching its specimen, and if something happens to the tag (chip) you can still have a unique identifier to ensure you get the proper chip back in place.

      So, we still have time, no reason to panick yet :-)

  24. Whether she was murdered or not I think would be answered by this question: Do you really think that the Royal family is heavily into the occult and do they really have strong connections to the Illuminati and other secret societies? Whatever answer you find there, then that's the answer to the other question…

  25. actually they think all muslims are barbaric. I dont think that but i do believe that islam is a very dangerous religion.Of course the elite wants to control islam in many cases which they already do(they started islam through the catholic church)thats why even you religious leaders pay homage to the pope.Islam wont conform so they will make you guys hence Egypt rebellion,libya,and the troops in other countries.its an age old trick.Trust me that doesnt make your religion more credible but it does show that you guys live and die by it almost better than other religions,and they dont like that.I dont mean any harm at all.Sorry jews and christian has lost more than muslims. they been dieing 500 to 600 years longer than you guys and are still being killed by muslims in none western countries.also jews come on 6 million plus at holocaust and thousands of years before then.

    • Islam is not a dangerous religion-

      What makes you say that I wonder…The media of course!

      Islam is a religion of peace, Islam means peace and it promotes peace.

      The Illuminati are definitely against Islam because its a monotheist religion. They know Islam is true. Look at the Quran and compare it to any other book in the world. Not one of them come close to perfection the way the Quran does. Most of the things in the Quran, especially the scientific things, are proven to be true. Even though the Quran was revealed and written over 1400 years ago.

      Quran tells us one of the basic things about Planet Earth, that it is around. The Quran told us this 1400 years ago, way before the scientists these days discovered it. And of course there are many many more jaw dropping things to be found in the Quran. All from God.

      If you really want the truth then I suggest that you really do look into Islam. You won't regret it at all and you can thank me on the Day of Judgement when we're both saved from an eternity in hell, if God wills.

      • Islam is not a dangerous religion?? You've been brain-washed. Go get the book called "Captive in Iran" and read the horrors of what Islam has wrought. See the next comment below where the Quran calls for violence. Islam calls believers to kill non-believers and those who leave Islam. You obviously don't read the stories of the violence that has been unleashed on innocent men, women and children all in the name of allah. Allah is a false god. He's the devil himself. Jesus is the way, the truth and life and no one can come to the Father, except through Him.

    • @K

      "If you really want the truth then I suggest that you really do look into Islam. You won’t regret it at all and you can thank me on the Day of Judgement when we’re both saved from an eternity in hell, if God wills."

      Sounds like a nice Allah you have there. If he wills?

      Christianity was around several hundred years before Islam. If you want the truth, I suggest you start there.

  26. "When cover-ups are too sloppy and evidence begin piling disproving them, limited concessions are made to quell the public’s questions."

    Well said.

  27. Edge Of Glory on

    I bet Charles set it up. He's been a self-serving liar since day one. He had his own wife bumped off just so he could parade around with that Horse faced floozy for the benefit of the paps.

  28. It was never about Charles, it's all about William. You look back at Diana's bloodline and you'll see that she was the furthest thing away from a "commoner" imaginable – I see they're trying to push the same sh!t with Kate or Katherine or whatever the hell they're calling her today – "she's a commoner". Eh, no, she ain't. The Queen is coming to Ireland this week for 4 days and you'd want to see the uproar around Dublin – the whole city is practically cordoned off. Obama's due over in a couple weeks. Something's going down lads, big time.

  29. I don't think it's a war on Islam. I'm sorry, but as a veteran I have to say we bend over backwards to accomodate these people. They're allowed free expression of their religious observances and dress without discrimination, regardless of how it might interfere with a typical work week. Schools across the nation are now having "Discovering Islam" weeks and the like; meanwhile, Walmarts can't play traditional Christmas songs referencing Christ because it might "offend" someone.

    Despite Muslim's sometimes open disdain for the United States, they are allowed to come here, get educated, and rise to positions of great authority over others. Not to mention the mosque built a few blocks from the Twin Towers memorial–nice touch.

    Do you think that any Christian could go over to the Middle East, state they are a Christian openly, and be afforded the same benefits? Neither do I.

    • then you clearly haven't come to UAE…or the Gulf…you ought to know more about such things before making comments without any proof…

  30. For those of you worrying about Kate, you don't need to. Prince William and Kate are related; they're 12th cousins.

    • Absolutely. I shared this with a few people during a conversation and they looked at me like I was crazy. This bloodline is not only well protected but considered scared (in their eyes). They inbreed to ensure their power, prestige and the material items they amass are kept within their satanic, occult blood line.

  31. ThirdEyeAwake on

    Princess Diana was killed for mainly two reasons: First, because she had millions of followers and the world loved her. Whatever she (could) have said would have turned the tied for the NWO Agenda. Secondly, she was going to marry a Muslim. It is widely known that the Illuminati HATES Muslims, hence why the "War In Iraq" pile of garbage and the psychological war against the Middle East (Whenever you think of 9/11, which was planned by the government, who do you think of? That's right, Muslims).

    Also, she would have given birth to a Muslim baby, and again we all know the Illuminati take genetics and blood very seriously so what did they do to prevent ALL of this from happening?

    They killed her. End of story.

  32. I remember the day that Diana died. My dad (RIP) who was working for the Ministry of Defence at the time said to me "It wasn't an accident, she was killed by M15/M16…"He was deadly serious. I think once she was started going out with Dodi and became pregnant by him…the establishment had had enough. It was time for her to go

  33. coolawesomez on

    Isn't Keith Allen, Lily Allen's father? you know the singer who I believe is also mind controlled by the illuminati.Like the one in her song The fear, it has plenty of subliminal messages in the music video.If he knows so much about these stuff why can't he get his own daughter out of the business?

    • yep it's him..he's an actor, I suspect a freemason. I'm not going to pay to watch the film, unless it's on freeview.

  34. i'd like to ask when is the showing of this in all over the world except UK.. i mean right now i'm so interested about this and im so dying to watch the docu. ^^

  35. I wonder why the boys Willy and Harry don't ever question their mother's death. Are they not exposed to the information out there available to them? If they have come across some sort of evidence or info that relates to their mother's death then why not question it, how can they know that knowledge and live with it!….Sometimes I wonder how much these boys even love or miss their mother. But that's a bit irrelevant, I think the old git by the title of 'our queen' must have brain washed them with a few lies!

    Also in an article written here previously on a memorial that was done for Diana and Dody in Harrods, in which there were Free Masonic belongings all over…makes you wonder is Mohammed Al Fayed not aware of the illuminati behind his sons death if he allowed such Free Masonic objects to be present at their memorial OR is he not even aware that these are Free Masonic?…..Hmmm very thought provoking.

  36. It is a fact that Diana's family had a better lineage than Charle's. Now, we all know that the terrible "puzzle" regarding her death still remains unfinished. There are still far too many pieces which did not fall into places- not even by pushing here or stretching there! Not one of the important questions has been answered in a satisfactory way…and we should NOT STOP until we get those answers! Charles and Camila, in other circumstances, have what I could call a forbidden, beautiful and maybe true/undying love… My romantic side could even find excuses for their lives apart (she was married, not a suitable candidate, etc.) and their love seems to have remained strong and alive throughout the years… But the fact that everything was a "sordid plan" (specially by Camilla who acted as a mastermind, choosing the perfect bride for Charles), makes me feel sick to my stomach! How can someone possible have used a very young, innocent and emotionally fragile girl, full of aspirations, in such a cold and cruel manner??? I have no words to express my feelings towards all those involved in the HELL that they turned Diana's life into. Diana was the one who should be at the Abbey watching her precious son getting married. Not Camila!

  37. There's no question she was murdered. Royalty, hollywood, the social elite are just one dark sinister group. Unless they repent, they will have to answer to Jesus for the sins they committed. No one guess away with sin. No one.

  38. I remember this! The media reported the crash and I remember thinking how convenient because she had been extremely vocal about her unhappiness with the royal family and I believe she had won custody of her kids plus a settlement from Charles. Anyway, none of the news outlets reported any kind of fatal injuy. In fact they said the opposite, they said she was just being taken to hospital with minor injuries, some said she might need surgery. I went to bed. By the next morning she was dead! WTF?? I knew then she was murdered! Her death did not jibe with the reports from the night before and I thought once again. How convenient! Bastards, I loved Princess Di!

  39. Just Wondering on

    Ýou know, everytime I hear that some politician, star, or whatever popular person get´s accused of something I think "What did they do to get check mated?" Like Strauss-Kahn who is head of the IMF, and now being accused of rape by a maid. Who knows what he did wrong to the "elite" to get pushed off the plank. I honestly doubt that the 62 yearl old man tried or actually raped a hotel maid, he has all the money he needs to get any call girl or whatever luxury prostitute he wants. Not even his army of lawyers can get him out of jail, but Berlusconi who was caught redhanded with adolescents having sex parties is not in jail yet??? Hmmmm…. Then "The Royal Wedding" is right around premier time for the "Unlawful Killing" movie. Plus the media pushing the rape thing up to a high. Very suspicious… I don´t believe in coincidences.

    • severalminds on

      good observation…i also think that strauss is attacked by elite. I heard that he was a potential opposer of Sarkozy on the next elections in france…

      israel since it is created is always in conflict and often was called by international community to observe the rules of neighborhood, of good sense, sadly, they don't seem giving a damn to international community recomendations…

      i go a little off topic. Don't know if u heard about the nonsense written by some Arthur Koestler, the book is called "the13th tribe". Actually by this new false theory Koestler (jewish and ex KGB agent) wanted to obtain 2 targets: to put a base for future privatisation of caucasus by sionists 2) to cancel anti semitism as by the opinion of Koestler the anti semitism was a geoèpolitical problem, he was sure that if he could create a new origin for jews far from oriental lands, the anti-semitism would disappear…actually it is obviously stupid. However, Koestler wrote a false history claiming that many centuries ago Khazar turks were massively turned into judaism, suddenly without any region…however Koestler couldn't find any trace or proof on his theory, moreover, he couldn't in no way connect Khazars to 12 jewish tribes, so he was obliged to invent 13th tribe…later he confessed to the french biologist Pierre Ritzen that he wrote that false history in order to save his people from anti semitism..he was convinced that connecting the jews to turks, the people around would respect jews as part of turks…it is really sad and ridiculous in the same time, i wonder why the jews don't try to earn the respect just as jews, without attacking themselves to somebody elses reputation???…i wonder why some people go behind any false scientist which pops out suddenly writing the fables…so khazars never were jewish, they pracitced shamanism and then turned christian, later they were turned to islam by the arab invasors…this is the truth. Till now there is no jewish trace in caucasus…by the way, after his unconvenient confession Koestler was found dead/killed among with his wife at home…was he killed by his elite clients which ordered him to write a false book about history in order to confuse the story of nations and the world and create new conflict between the nations?….
      "Koestler's reason for writing it

      Koestler biographer Michael Scammell writes that Koestler told French biologist Pierre Debray-Ritzen he "was convinced that if he could prove that the bulk of Eastern European Jews (the ancestors of today's Ashkenazim) were descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear".[3] According to George Urban, Koestler's desire to connect Ashkenazi Jews with Khazars was "based on a tacit belief that the intellectual brilliance of and international influence of Hungarians and Jews, especially Hungarian Jews or Jewish-Hungarians, was due to some unexplained but clearly ancient affinity between the two peoples".[7]"

  40. severalminds on


    thank you for consideration. I do agree with your comments answering to the people who try to help the conflict between the one-god religions. Actually this is a part of illuminati plans – ro devide and empire, create conflicts between the one god religions in order to make confusion and feed the hate – the best food of evil…

    as i said before it is not about islam or christianism apart, but THEY are against all the motheistic religions…there is no problem for christians in islamic countries, furthermore, the christians are respected a lto by muslim people as those 2 religions have the same doctrine and origin.

    i see that the last years there a re a lot of new steretypes created on purpose by the evils servants which try to make appear the one God believers as stupid, ignorant, barbaric or dangerous. In movies, music videos, books and etc. they try to idolise the vampirism, darkness, magics and other bullshit of this category and by other side they attack badly the one God believers, religious, good, honest people. It is started almost by a long time, see the movie "grease" for example…the message of this movie is: if you want to obtain a consideration and success you must become a bitch…while the girl was good, timid, simple, not voulgar she wasn't considered, as soon as she changed her style to voulgar kind, started to smoke, to make up her face badly, she became a "winner"…this is the message that evil servants induce into the brain of young people in order to put them on the way of pervertion and moral degradation…for the same reason they have created the rubbish such as lady gaga, rihanna, perry etc. which adevertise a life with no moral values and dignity, total slaveness to devil…

    • Voice of Reason on

      I agree…and what's up with all of the 'May 21st is Doomsday' crap? Who's funding all of that? I'm not sure how many people are part of that group, but their new vans look very expensive, and their extensive billboard/ad campaign can't have been cheap. Yet, from what I've read, most of these people didn't sell their homes and belongings to finance this…they just walked away from their stuff.

      This makes me wonder if the whole mess was financed by the Illuminati, in yet another attempt to discredit Christianity; by portraying Christians as delusional, egotistical weirdos.

  41. In truth i think Diana was killed for several reasons.

    1. She was a sexaholic. She had slept around like a dog in heat with several people from her horse trainer to her doctor to her attendant, mostly at the same time. She was giving a bad name to the royal family.

    2. She then had the audacity to question the royal family and attempt to drag their name in the mud, plus essentially make Charles broke by collecting everything from him in the divorce proceedings. All this while, she became the darling of the media and used the media against the royals. She played the victim and made the royals look like molesters and brutes, but they did nothing.

    3. However, eventually she crossed the threshold. She started sleeping around with Dodi and when she realized she was pregnant for him, decided to get engaged to him. So the future King of England would now have a muslim half brother, assuming she ends up having only one kid for Dodi Al Fayed. There could be even more muslim half nieces for Queen Elizabeth. Sacrilege.

    4. She flaunted her pregnancy in the media in her bid to taunt the royal family and make them bitter. You see, Diana was always a bit of an immature, sulky kid who always wants things to go her way. So the royal family ordered the hit and the rest is history.

    I think her sons have been told why she was killed and they agreed with the rationale even if they wished it had turned out different. They'd have been asked, "what would you have done if you were King?". Believe me, the answer would have been "the same thing" even if she was my mother. The Royal family is bigger than any one person, especially one who was royal by marriage and not by blood. So it isn't a conspiracy. Deep down, everyone knows that Diana crossed the line and was killed…….because she rattled the cobras tail a little too often.

    • Still her murder isn't justified. The media is owned by them, they could easily ignore her and stop reporting her shenanigans. The whole thing has a nasty stench and there are no excuses in my book to murder her, whoever did it.

  42. the minute she died i knew she had been murdered. a beautiful girl, naive and lost in an old established FIRM….from the start she was made to feel insignificant, she became/was a loose cannon as she hurtled through fog…..i dont believe she was murdered by royalty but by fanatical loyalists…(Echo's and reminiscent of : 'WHO WILL RID ME OF THIS TURBULANT PEST") reverberate in my ears

    Darling Di rest in peace ….THEY didnt want a muslim so close to the british throne and future king!e

  43. I will be watching. I have always believed she was murdered too. Diana was a threat to the Royal Family because she was her own woman and went against everything the establishment represented. Didn't this "accident" happen shortly after she divorced Charles?

  44. I've known people at crash sites who were alert and talking after the crash, but then died. In those cases, it was internal bleeding.

  45. I obviously think that Diana was rather murdered in this fatal car accident. I felt bad for her since

    she was being put through this pressure of having had to be like one of the Royals. She was a beautiful and honest woman, she was herself and she went against everything that the Royals established. After doing tons of research on her, I learned that she was brought up just to marry Prince Charles.On August 31st 2005, which was the eighth anniversary of Diana’s death, the major questions still have not been answered, in fact the public now believe overwhelmingly that the biggest conspiracy theory, is the establishment view she was not murdered at all.

  46. Muslims view Jesus/Yeshua as a prophet, just like Mohammed.

    The real Yeshua was a Palestinian. Which also explains a lot.

    And he was agains religions and governments. And he even told the truth like it is, about Mother Earth and Father Sun, Sound and Light (electrons and atoms, per pure definition).

    Oh, and Satan was just Hebrew a word for sickness, and christ meant clean…

    Check out the Essene Gospel of Peace.

    Only thing that might save the world.

  47. Whether or not she died in that car accident I truly believe the queen (I refuse to capitalize the q) had something to do with her death, and people go around bowing and worhiping her, it's disgusting to watch.

  48. the watchful on

    wow i wonder if the same will happen to kate middleton,

    and what a coincidence that dodi and is father died on the same night??i never knew that..

  49. Did anyone hear the rumour about Diana being embalmed??

    Is it true?

    And isn't embalming illegal in France?

  50. i remember it very well , it was early in the morning and i was talking to my girlfriend on the phone when it popped up on the news , i saw her alive and smoking a cigerete with a small ambulance lady , they where walking in and out the back of the ambulance and checking on dodi in the back of the car , the news said dodi was dead and diana had a bad cut on her thigh , but i saw her walking about ? did anybody else see this ? i know my girlfiend did . i new it wasnt an accident at the time


  52. Here's the link to watch the documental online. Sorry about my english. Greetings from the Dominican Republic.

  53. Mommi Poppins on

    I know princess Diana would like monogrammed Holiday Inn cookies. Make sure you ask before you check in. Some locations don't have the cookies. She would also like the Charlie Brown Cafe. If you are still alive wear a mask and try these items.

  54. Graham John Baker on

    In my view I personally think Lady Diana is alive and well as is dodi a lot of celebrities do fake their deaths in order to escape the lime light in some cases the celebrity is in serious debt and owes hundreds of thousands of pounds if not millions to someone or an organisation such as a bank or other company etc and all too often the moment the celebrity has supposedly popped his or her clogs then all of a sudden all their merchandise mommorbelia suddenly sells like hot cakes and all of a sudden the amount of money being made from the sudden increase in all the merchandise and memobelia etc is is often more than enough to get them out of debt also being celebrity has its downside they cannot just go round to the local shops without being pestered for an autograph or a photo or being pestered in some way and although many have servents etc to go to the shops etc for them and others have security guards etc with them some well known celebrities have been seen on their own in their local supermarket or superstore etc so in order to escape the lime light they fake the death and go and live secretly in hiding somewhere in the world and they have more than enough money to disguise themselves with extra make up or even plastic surgery to change their appearance or could even cover their heads arms or legs etc if they are hiding in an arab country I think personally Lady Diana and Dodi are living in the middle east it would be very easy for her to disguise themselves by dressing up as arab muslims etc u would never recognise them even Michael Jackson and two Pack and Biggy and believe it or not Margaret Thatcher and many others are still alive we are just never told the truth

  55. I honestly believe Princess Diana was murdered. Lets look at the evidence shall we? The note, the explosion heard at the site, the cameras that were mysteriously off or not working, the mysterious white Fiat that was at the scene, according to eyewitness accounts that has mysteriously disappeared. The fact that it took a little over an hour to get to the hospital when it should have taken MUCH LESS than that. Coincidence? I THINK NOT! The paparazzi were not even there at the crash site. They chased Diana's car, then the car got away from them, then the paparazzi showed up after the "accident." I wonder if Prince William and Prince Harry know the truth or if they believe whatever lies Charles and the Queen have told them. RIP Diana.

  56. The woman (Diana) was able to live in another house with another man without the knowledge of the public for how long??? I have more than considered Diane and her new bo, or possibly her relationship with him was entirely made up, had made the decision to bow out of public, consider the divorce. Quite possible.

Leave A Reply