Disturbing Sex Kitten French Vogue Photoshoot Featuring Children
By VC | December 18th, 2010 | Category: Latest News | 216 commentsThis issue of French Vogue features a truly disturbing photo shoot featuring young girls (around 6 years old) in heavy make-up, high heels and designer clothes. Some pictures actually “sexualize” these girls by placing them in strange settings.
Notice the presence of feline prints in many photos – a reference Sex Kitten programming (aka Beta Programming). Lost of innocence, premature sexualization, awkward settings, ritual abuse, blank stares…the pics truly reek of mind controlled children.
“Cadeaux” means “gifts” and, in the context of this last pic, the term takes a truly sickening meaning.
What the eff is this BS??!
Twisted isn’t the word. But how crazy is the theory now the Jon Benet Ramsey probably was fataly injured in some sick sex ritual hosted by her parents?! Not so much when you see pure pedophilia called “art.” When a society locks people up for life for drug crimes but child rapists get paroled, you know you’re living in a f’d up world with sick ass priorities!
How true. Our nearby small town of Pueblo, CO, has a local man that wrote a book called, “The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure”. It took a while for the pressure to mount and Amazon to finally pull the thing, due to their allegiance to protecting “free speech”.
http://www.newsfirst5.com/news/amazon-pulls-pedophile-book-by-pueblo-man/
These kids in the shoot are dressed pretty inappropriately and seductively. Quite offputting, IMO.
Only quite offputting
This one in particular – http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/vogue-paris-kids.jpg – and the one under that are distinctively disturbing because they’re overtly-sexualized. Unfknblvbl
Oh wow, that’s really inappropriate.
this is seriously nauseating.. materialism, exploitation of children, teaching them that looks matter most. and then putting her as a gift under the tree? so unnecessary
all of the things you stated are true in ANY beauty commercial, magazine, tv show, etc… Vogue is not to be martyrized.
This is so disturbing, I can’t even begin to describe…
With teenage pregnancy rising more and more, society really can’t afford anymore stupid girls getting knocked up so we the taxpayer support them the rest of their days.
But girls (and boys, mind you) are just so plugged into the system that they don’t care about anything other than the instant gratification of entertainment…
is that really what worries u about this shoot?? Not the fact that young girls have the highest rate of mental health problems then any other social group including eating disorders and depression. Or that rape and sexual assault amoung young people being at an all time high. Your worried that tax payers money might have to support the kids of stupid young girls. may I remind you it takes a stupid boy/man to get a girl pregnant, she doesn’t do it to herself.
oh dear, more and more paedophiles coming up
mind control or not this is still f*cked up .. I can’t imagine who are the parents who would put there girls through some thing like this
Who says they’re all girls? Sure they’re all made up as girls, but at least two of the pictures actually look boyish.
godozo….honestly if u look closely at them….every single one of them has features of a boy…..i think this shit is even sicker than meets the eye….they’re trying to confuse the mind like they have in so many other instances….and reality is we won’t even know but one thing i do know is that this world is a real fucked up place….god save us
It’s all about the money, GREED! GREED! GREED! Not even the children’s parents gives a damn! Otherwise, they would not have been in these pages. Don’t you see, It is we who created the monsters that we have today, preying on our children. May God helps is right!
Oh my God, I just noticed that indeed at least one them IS a boy, it’s the one in the 1st, 2nd, the middle one in the 5th , 7th and 8th picture. That one is heavily sexualized and covered in the prints and as the gift. If that isn’t pedofilia then what the heck it’s supposed to be??
don’t get me wrong..i things these pictures are VERY DISTURBING BUT How on EARTH did you determine that that’s a boy????!
I do think some of these pic’s are boys which is even sicker . God please be with these children.
Sorry. The parents of these kids are already deep into this, and the kids themselves are too ‘over there’ for God to care about them.
First of all, I don’t know who was the person who said these kids were already “too far from God”? Fuck you. These kids need God more than anybody else.
Now, more to the point— you’re all missing the jewelry. The jewelry might be the most obvious indicator of abuse, present (aside from the poses, probs and animal print.)
Notice all of the girls at least once wear rubies? (Reward for enduring sexual trauma.) The older girl has emeralds, which is appropriate, since she has most likely had more time to show family loyalty.
So what. This is about little children made up to turn on a god damn pedophile. Boy or girl, this is sick, disturbing sh*t, and it is absolutely disgusting this is put out as ‘art’. Child molestors run rampant in your govt buildings and some of the highest places in society. Our world is ruled by pedophiles. Straight up.
look at the girl in the fourth picture.
1.) why does she have a tooth brush. (weird prop for a high fashion photo shoot would you not agree?)
2.) Why is the tooth brush angled so you can see it protruding from the side of her cheek? (I’m sure all of you have seen some one make that same gesture in a sexual and disgusting way before)
3.) If you look at her lips closely you can see that an excessive amount of lip gloss or just flat out photo editing was done to make the light reflecting off of her lips look pure white. Disturbingly close to a certain bodily fluid produce by males.
I find these photographs horrific and extremely disturbing. I am about to have a child of my own and these photos really did scare the shit out of me. This battle can be won please people protect your children and stay informed. Hope is alive.
Which makes it even more sick!!
That’s true. I went back and looked after I read your post, and some of them look like boys.
One Word: Anime.
Especially the third picture.
That was my first thought too.
SOOOOO SIIIIIIIICK!!!!!!
This is just plain inappropriate. God deliver these kids and straighten the thoughts of their parents.
I dont think you can straighten thoughts of parents who take it this far. This is something inbreeded in these families. You would basicaly have to remove the child from that family enviroment. I say take off anyones head who commits these satanic acts against these children and I do mean that.
This is DISGUSTING!!! But hey this is Vogue, so it’s art :-/
ffffwhoa…Im a little speechless. Sexualisation of CHILDREN let alone grown adults in the media. This is wrong, full stop.
They don’t want kids to be just kids anymore…they are robbing their youth and trying to make it look trendy and fashionable. Kids today are trying to grow up waaay to fast …mostly because society is telling them they can.
but….Parents are suppose to protect their children & teach them how to act but with everyone letting TV’s babysit their kids until their adults im not really shocked…especially when their idols from Disney are now making it look cool to do drugs and dress like sluts etc…
Disney is a cover up for the biggest pedofiliers on the face of this earth. I hate Disney and anything associated with Disney. BASTARDS for what they do to these babies.
People this is preposterous, the parents of this children should be ashamed for allowing this crap in the first place,poor kids they even look so sad.
Boycott any of this shit magazines, write to editor and publisher, what a crime!!!
BOYCOTT DISNEY TOO
As a french girl who was born and lived in France I can honestly say that “the watchers” have full control over the french population. Affairs and infidelitys are accepted as mainstream. Woman are objectified and men are in sexual control of at least 2 in their normal daily lives. These young girls are being trained to be nothing but child bearing sex slaves. The lucky ones let their handlers buy them fancy clothes and jewlery in exchange for their discretion keeping secrets of 2 or even 3 mistresses. Its appalling.
Completely disgusting! The magazine should be charged with conducting/promoting the exploitation of minors. The picture of the girl with the toothbrush (I think it’s a toothbrush) is certainly simulating the act of oral sex. I bet every paedophile will have this picture taped about their beds. The fact that she looks as though she is of Asian/Oriental descent reeks of Cambodia where children are used as sex slaves. This magazine needs to be pulled and an investigation launched into the photographer, editor, and parents who have allowed this to happen. Turns my stomach!
Wow….now see, at first glance, most of these would be considered truly beautiful–because I think that it could pass for art, ya know? Sure the makeup was extreme, and the outfits were mature, but almost all little girls dress up that way and put on makeup during play time and would Love to have a photo shoot…And I LOVE stuff like that–but all the feline references everywhere just shows that it’s all about the whole sex kitten programing thing–which–if you don’t know about it–do some Google’ing and prepare yourself for the horrors you’ll find. That stuff is truly terrifying and I found it difficult to look these beautiful little girls in their eyes as I insepcted the pictures, because I wonder what they’re going through right now, or went through that day. I’m not kidding–that shit is SCARY, UNBELIEVABLE stuff.. God please be with them and help them, all of them..
Yeah, sure most little girls dress-up in mommy’s clothes, shoes, and make-up at home for play. But, these girls are in sexualized posses and in an adult magazine!!!! Good point someone made about the rabbits being a symbol of fertility, you know that was no accident by the photographer. So what are they implying? Just sick.
So true. While I was looking at that pic in particular, the rabbits really jumped out at me (pardon the pun) and I KNEW they were some sick symbol, I just couldn’t think of what it was…. now I got it. Un-freaking-believable.
I agree….this illuminati shit is so scary!! When I first found Vigilant I felt like I MYSELF fell down the rabbit hole! I can’t believe this stuff actually exists! But we are in a spiritual warfare of good versus evil.
The little girls are playing with rabbits. In paganism the Rabbit is a symbol of fertility. Happy Easter.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/19144/the_origin_and_history_of_the_easter.html
Yea i was abut to say the same thing as you. The rabbit is a symbols of fertility in the pagan world. In France the way we call a womanizer or player is ” show lapin’ which mean the rabbit’s show. They use this term in reference of the rabbit fertility . It is disgusting and we all know that all those ELITES people ( politicians, celebrities religious leaders ) are pedophiles. Anyone can go look up on Google. Most of the high level Freemason males are pedophiles. They are totally perverted, homosexuals, orgies and what not.
In MK Ultra the rabbit symbolizes the handler, the one who controls the victims once they are programmed.
THE RABBIT ALSO REPRESENTS THE FREAKIN PROGRAMMER / HANDLER OF THESE MK VICTIMS. GOD PLEASE BE WITH THESE BABIES
why does the girl in the 2nd pic have on a plunging neckline??? she’s not even old enough to have boobies but here she is in a bed posing…that’s sick. and is the girl in the 3rd pic supposed to be demonstrating fellatio???
I noticed that too! It’s just truly sick.
Disturbing and possibly criminal – How are they getting away with THIS blatant exploitation?
This makes me so sick to my stomach I can’t even find the words. And so sad for these little girls. Look into their eyes……some of them it’s like their souls are in mourning, and others just look so scared. I just want to take them home with me and rescue them from all the scum who are exploiting them. I”m betting there is a special place in hell for those involved in MK.
that sick,really sick.fucking vogue is trying to help the child predators out.
“Moreover, in these unhappy times, there will be unbridled luxury which, acting thus to snare the rest into sin, will conquer innumerable frivolous souls who will be lost. Innocence will almost no longer be found in children, nor modesty in women.”
Marian Apparition
Visionary: Venerable Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres
Quito, Ecuador
Early 17th Century
Uh, that’s not pornography. Its high-fashion art photography from Cadeaun. The child subjects look like they are having a good time. Child predators like images of kiddie toys and bondage, not empowered girls. This is no more shocking than the heavy makeup at a child beauty pageant.
…..yeah, and those child beauty pageants are just as WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW do the child subjects look like they are having a good time??? Truly sick.
@oldParasiteSingle How do you know what child predators like? And while heavy makeup looks wrong on a child in any setting, this images have blatant sexual implications. Why would you defend this? How could anyone find this acceptable?
Parasitesingle, you are probably a child predator yourself. For you to shrug this disgusting sh*t off and say umm yea theres not much wronghere, shows us all that you are a sick individual who is into this kind of thing. I hope you die soon.
Ummm…just curious – how would you say this shows “empowerment?” Because reclining on a chair, with a dress pulled up above the knee – or in the other pic, reclining on a bed, with ropes tied around one’s ankles (oh sorry, those are just shoe laces – whatever) – how does that reflect empowerment? And since when did jewelery or clothes give one power anyway? And let’s not forget the OBVIOUS fact of what we’re lookin’ at- kids! And kids are simply never “empowered.” They aren’t adults…they haven’t grown up yet. They are young, innocent, and small – and they need looking after by responsible adults. It’s the way of nature! It’s the way it should be. This crazy photo shoot is trying to send mixed signals all over the place in order to be “edgy” and confuse the viewer. The faces of the kids looks like the faces of many “adult” models…I say “adult” in quotes because most walking the runway are 15 or 16 so they do not qualify as adults yet either…but these kids with the large amount of makeup on at their ages really do resemble 15-16 year old faces. Of course their bodies look ridiculous in those clothes…but most models do too – in that the starvation they’re subjected to causes the body to delay developmentally. There is a strong mark of androgeny among most models these days and that’s due to 1) age (secondary sex characteristics take TIME to develop) and 2) like I mentioned prior…starvation delays this development. When the body is deprived of adequate nutrients it preserves what little fuel it has for what are called vital organs, therefore normal development is delayed. So most kids parading down a runway these days very rarely resemble the adult female form. One can argue that swimsuit models have secondary sex characteristics – but that’s because they’re selling swimsuits and swimsuits and such fashion have an appeal to men – and most men want a woman, not an underdeveloped 15 year old. But they’re still extremely thin – so they use implants to mimic the development of breast tissue. But I digress….the point is, it seems to me that all things natural these days – aging, families, death as an aspect of life – all these things are being packaged and sold to the public as “bad” and only eternal youth is “good” – and youth as an extreme, and in the forms I mentioned earlier. The line between male and female is being merged…androgyny seems to reign supreme in its sterile, uniform, features. People look more and more alike…and if they don’t resemble each other, they seek out plastic surgery to do so. Conformity to a great mass is beginning to take shape – and those who embrace nature and the natural course of aging and life are deemed “luddites” or “technophobes.” The dead eyes of the children in these pics I find the most disturbing. Some say these are kids playing dress up? If so – where is the life? Where is the innocence? Where is the joy in their eyes that true little girls have when trying to imitate mommy? I see none of that here. That would portray a true child. The goofy, silly, and innocent nature of a kid trying to imitate an adult. But instead we see kids with blank stares, slightly parted lips, and looking utterly lifeless…almost robotic in nature. This is not normal. I think anyone who believes it resembles normalcy should take a break from mass media and take a walk in nature to get back to what reality should be about – to reconnect to what life truly is – not as seen through the lens of a twisted photographer.
The last picture with the girl under the Christmas tree is purely sad and vile. What does her father think of this? I know damn well that my parents would beat the crap out of me if I were to engage in sexual stimulating ordeals such as this. I mean seriously! Not only are they preparing to be future sex symbols but they are also giving children their age something to “look up” to and something to admire and strive for. These poor children. What a sad sad world.
Dispicable.
Even from a young age, this is all they will ever say of us. This is all they will ever see; woman, the lesser being, is nothing more than a symbol of sex.
Don’t these kids have PARENTS?!
Their Parents are already F’Up to begin with; drug addicts, pedophiles…….., this is why the Elite chose these girls in the first place.
The parents are the ones who put them in these situations to begin with. The parents are more than likely abusing their kids, to have them in these types of situations. Think “Jonbenet Ramsey”.
That’s just mental…..
Really… How fucked up is this world?
these kids are most likely mk ultra. as the sickos known as the illuminati are getting them ready to be your next celebritys when there older so they can continue to brain wash the sheeple
This is so sick. I cannot believe what I have just seen. I would imagine that every paedophile has these photos pinned to the wall, for their ‘enjoyment’. The blank expressions on these poor kids faces make them look like the victims of abuse. If nothing else, these childrens’ human rights have been violated. Whoever commissioned these photographs and the photographer responsible for them should be prosecuted for child abuse. God help us.
Sadly this further confirms who’s running the fashion industry and why the models, mainly women, have to have these rail thin bodies. Grown women who physically look like children/boys. I’m sure they were happy to do a shoot where they didn’t have to get women of legal age, they just went right to what they always try to portray. If they could do it, and all roads seem to lead to it, the entire fashion industry would be only for children ages 2-8, 10-12 may be pushing it just a bit.
I wonder what types of parents would actually let these people dress their kids like that and put on that much make-up on them.LORD have mercy!!!
This is absolutely sick and turns my stomach. Interesting use of a toothbrush by the way. Absolutely, 100% disgusting and the sickos who publish this cr*p should be punished.
agreed, the toothbrush use is really inappropriate…
All these people are child porn pedophiles. They make me sick, and what is worse is the parents who let their kids participate in such crap for the opportunity of fame and fortune.
i am linking this article at my forum, this is absolutely insane that they are pushing shit like this ever increasing, and getting away with it. thank you for finding this and publishing it.
Odd name choice NWO..
its for SEO (search engine optimization) purposes for my website.
I hope I’m not looking into things too much but who takes photos of brushing your teeth or whatever she’s got in her mouth (3rd photo)?? Sexual imagery much??
Dont worry, Your not ‘looking into it too deep’! Theyre assulting yours and my minds by putting that connotation in there! Most people looking at it thinks the same! wow… I feel violated that my brain is being brought to those connotations!
I thought that was very odd too.
some of these comments are a STRETCH…..the suggestiveness of the toothbrush pose, however, is not a stretch.
*screams and runs away in horror*
I just came across this on another site on fashion as well. It disturbs me like crazy! My first thought was of that nude photoshoot Brooke Shields’ mother thought was a good idea at the time (maybe even now..). Children are meant to be cute and lively, not sullen and poutish.. Not giving blank stares in heavy make up and high heels!! Yet all this is probably no big deal in Europe, since they have a very relaxed culture there and I’m probably more on the prudish side.
that is what i thought of and the movie “kids”. The entertainment industry just loves to get their hands on kids with irresponsible, money hungry parents
The future Karen Mulders OMG
That first image shocked me, wtf ?
Another way people can boycott this is through avoiding buying certain perfumes…I am not someone who wears designer clothes but I used to buy some of the perfumes like Versace, and don’t anymore.
Diane von Furstenburg is definitely one to avoid…she was one of the many celebs who supported
the non imprisonment/punishment of Roman Polanski (Hollywood film director) Polanski being guilty of drugging, raping and sod*mising a 14 year old girl. Her fashion shows are also full of the leopard print clothing which as someone else mentioned here, is symbolic of MK ULTRA ‘sex kitten’ programming (Many celebrities, such as Britney, Christina A, Rihanna, and Gaga were programmed into this from a young age (for Brit and Christina A, via the Mickey Mouse Club), as well as many top models also. Hence the connection.)
The fashion industry is truly a very ugly place, I’m realising more and more, guilty of glamorising anorexia and hard drug addiction. Though this is taking the depravity to a whole new low…this sucks :/
I also agree with the person who says boycott magazines like this…
I read in the paper just today that the long time editor of French Vogue has resigned.
VOUGE: MAGAZINE COMANDED FOR A PEDOPHILE :S
Wow,those pictures are super chic.
GO TO HELL YOU SATANIC PIG FROM HELL!!!!!
I truly believe their goal is to also confuse the sheeps.
First photo, you’re looking at it wondering if it’s really a boy or a girl because s/he has both features.
Pedophiles and homosexuality, isn’t that what their aiming for? Look at all the mainstream videos, and glee too. Did you guys see the glee “baby it’s cold outside” two males singing to each other? Goodness and everyone wanted them to KISS.
This is just plain filth…… stuff like this should truly be illegal… just giving the pedophiles more ammunition to feed their sickness… oh thank God that this will soon be over….
omg you people are alarmists
its FASHION photograpy aimed at WOMEN
most women as little girls took pleasure dressing in their mothers clothes and makeup, thats what this shoot is alluding to.
You people saying they are boys dressed as girls, claiming some kind of homo/pedo agenda are the sick ones.
How do you explain the kitten references?
Most women fantasized about taking pictures as kittens when they were little girls right?
BETA-Programming and animal print
Cadeau means gift in french. In case you didn’t know. Are they intending to say that kids should get this “sexy” clothes as gifts or that the oversexed children could be used as “gifts”? What about the girl under the Christmas tree?
Vogue is an adult magazine, so why using kids instead of adult models? Think about it.
Is Cadeu possibly the photographed gift they advertise as suitable for children? Children that should be roaming in the gardens with knees bearing the signs of the latest fall from the bike (worked for me, at last)… That’s bad.
Subliminally the child “itself” is a Cadeau, maybe? That’s worse.
Personally, I find these photos disturbing because I hear about parents having trouble having photographed their own children on the beach. In other words, children can be exploited by the magazines while normal families must behave not to raise suspicion.
This is not news at all, of course. The same government that advocates control of internet here in Italy is headed by a guy who has 3 television channels. One of them aired for year a show with scantily clad teens dancing and stuff. That was supposed to be for teens, and in fact if you look it with innocence it was not as suggestive as this photos IIRC. But then they aired the reruns. After Midnight! Teens are supposed to be at 2AM watching tv???no wai the target is obviously different.
Does the system want paedophilia to rise so that there is another way to criminalize people? hmmmm.
About this photo set I would not even bother to read subliminal messages as the explicit message is clear enough: little ladies are old enough to dress in expensive dresses and imitate sexy grown-ups. Ain’t that scary enough?
You need to do a little more homework. Can’t women be pedophiles too? And if this imagery is aimed at young (under age 25) women…. um, they’re impressionable too, quite so actually, and the magazine publishers/advertisers all know this. It teaches women to accept this treatment as OK (for themselves or their daughters), through incremental exposure…. a VERY elementary concept.
No we are not the sick ones our eyes are open to this bs going on. Your the sick one for not thinking something is wrong with the pictures.
this is really disturbing.
2nd pic, the ankle bracelets looks like ropes, sex slave implication?
5th pic, it gives the impression that the girls are infront a mirror, but really there is no mirror, broken mirrors perhaps?
7th pic, black red white kittens masonic floor
also in the second pic, the rabbit’s eyes to the girl’s left (our right) is fixed on her private area
if you look closely at the sheet to the bottom right (our’s)…the long bulging line is implying a men’s penis. the tip or head, if you pay close attention can be seen toward the base of the pic
and it looks like shes directing the rabbit’s eyes to her private area by how shes gripping the neck.
the coloring of the designs of the chair in the first pic is that of a butterfly field. So it looks like the girl is sitting in a butterfly field.
the mirror picture…in the post to the far right (our’s) theres a very small pyramid carved out near the top
8th pic the girl is basically squeezing her breast.
sad to say but what breast?
What the hell? It’s bad enough that we have toddler/child beauty pageants but this is going to far… a child shouldn’t be glamorized in this way. Are the people behind this photo shoot pedophiles or something? If Vogue wanted do to do a child issue they should have done something that was age appropriate.
when I saw rabbits and mirrors I thought alice in wonderland, this is failry weak claim though seeing as I’ve nevr seen the actualy movie.
but if I did I’d like to see the Disney one for the sole sake of the art of old-school 2D animation. doubt I will anytime soon though..
the styling of the clothes used in the last pic is very impt…notice how she has the “one shoulder style” thing going on…it gives the impression as if shes undressing with the other shoulder sliding down. Notice how her hands are carefully placed over her private area…it is natural instinct to immediately cover your private area if you’re spotted naked by someone else which is what the last picture is implying…her undressing for a nude photoshoot to be someone by the public…
Who the fu** lets their kids do this, I mean the one with the toothbrush that is absurd.
i just think that the whole thing of the pictures is nasty but i could’nt help but laugh at the little girl with the big blue eyes with the black feathers on top of her head, she just reminded me of a mix between betty davis and lady gaga….
i am always hurt when i see girls and women being treated like that.i dont kno i have some special feelings abt them,i get sleepless nites when i hear such things or some1 talks abt porn they happen to watch.
Strange and disgusting, in the Netherlands we here and read daily, what this person has done to tchildren.
13-12-2010
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/8198137/Police-arrest-paedophile-babysitter-in-one-of-the-Netherlands-worst-abuse-cases.html
( in 2004 a mother of a child already reported this man, of abusing, the police did not do anything, she went away, from the police station with the words, told by an agent, ” children imagine a lot on that age”)
19-12-2010 this came out today , in the news
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12033773
Austria child porn suspects held after nationwide raids
It looks like a well programmed, EurOpe, media mind control program!
I can look at this pics whit out felling sorry for this kids and getting a feeling it is all off…weird, scary and awful
sorry I meant to say “I can’t”
Amazing how so many here complain about “mind control”, yet absorb the poison and brainwashing that has been fed to them by the government, news media, and fear- and hate-mongers like John Walsh.
This is really sick..
I am NEVER BUYING VOGUE in my life again. AT LEAST.
I had a thought, maybe its an issue for that same sick elite. SICK.
How is this NOT considered child pornography? God damn, let kids be KIDS! When I was 6 years old I wanted to be a ballerina…not a sex kitten. This is truly disgusting. It calls attention to pedophilia, child pornography, human sex trafficking, and of course the favorite: mind control/illuminati agenda. If you find this to be “artistic” then you’re probably the monarch programmed fool who did the photoshoot.
They’re kids but their eyes are like grown-ups………
This is the epitome of objectification. These photos display these girls as objects of sexual pleasure. It is illustrated that their value lies in their youth, whiteness, wealth, and ability to pleasure men. This is so wrong.
wow.
well… we have the info we need. now what are we to do.
i am a woman of faith… but i don’t subscribe to the notion that we will be saved/
this is a challenge to be met for our species, planet, and the spirit of the people.
its going to require imagination, courage, confidence, clarity, and care.
oh, and there is a term from Carl Yung that I’d like to share:
Enantiodromia (Greek: enantios, opposite + dromos, running course) is a principle introduced by psychiatrist Carl Jung that the superabundance of any force inevitably produces its opposite. It is equivalent to the principle of equilibrium in the natural world, in that any extreme is opposed by the system in order to restore balance.
–
even though i don’t think we are going to be saved… I do believe there are greater forces at work… laws of nature, and universe, laws of energy and karma- that will align (and are aligning now) for a favorable outcome for ‘the people” … but the people gotta meet them half way.
rise.
CCCC gotta agree with you. How does this magazine justify that they are not provocatively enticing pedophiles, and subconsciously screwing up peoples perceptions.
There seems to be no limits to the sick and twisted depravity of mankind. The scary thing is it will only get worse and I cannot even begin to imagine what that may be.
Very, very strange, and definetly the wrong message to the children.
Looks are NOT everything. :S
On the other hand, I can’t understand some of the reactions here, but maybe that’s just me.
It’s not very twisted in a sexual way, but rather in the general sense that kids will be even more shallow now.
OMW…What nonsense it this? This is sick.
this is just wrong in every way imaginable; mind control or just sheer vanity either way i feel bad for these kids. This world is getting filled with more and more sickos. If this is what i have to look forward to; please end it now.
these girls are absolutely beautiful. but it’s horrible because this is really no better than pageantry.
What did you think the modeling business was about? Who mostly runs the fashion world? Gay Men who tell women that they are too fat. and reward women that have more teen age boy figures (tall, flat chested, skinny). Straight Men who want to control women. And Vain women who want to out do each other? The French have pushed the fashion world to a new low. I will research who this fotopedifile is. Meanwhile there are a lot of people involved with OKing this shoot. The designer had to be ok with it as well as the magazine, the stylists, the modeling agencies and the parents. They all thought it was fine. If you are really appalled, then write to French Vogue and blog or tweet about it.
Children look gross when you put heavy make up on them. The clothes are ill fitting but i guess they did that in purpose.
I might get flamed here but i don’t see these pictures as being sexual really. In fact, I think the basic concept here is that underneath all the expenive jewlery, make up and clothes, all these materialistic diva’s are just little girls lost.
So, i don’t know. I’m not horrified by these pictures and don’t really see the big deal. Quiet frankly, to say a little girl who is fully dressed laying on her stomach is being overtly sexual seems a little weird to me….
yea, and the pedophiles too don’t see anything wrong with what they do: After all why do kids have sexual organs for? Helloooo!!! There’s NOTHING NORMAL about these pictures!!! They are plain sick and perverted! A kid should never have that expression on her face, or that clothing, or that make-up to begin with… Who are they trying to be appealing to? Definitely NOT to other kids. Definitely NOT to parents (they don’t advertise for anything other then themselves) … Than who??? Why do they have professional make-up if they are trying to suggest they applied it themselves???
Do you see anything wrong with the way YOU were created?
Sorry but you sound nuts.
Kids should never have that expression on their face? What expression?
You are probably some sexually twisted individual that sees sex and perversion everywhere. It’s a bunch of kids wearing clothes that’s to big for them and make up. I think you WANT to see something more perverse here…
Yeah, sorry guys, i just took another look at the pics. I’m still not seeing it
Now that picture of the Oh La La couture girls and noah cyrus was VERY, UNDENIABLY, inappropriate. But these girls are fully dressed, in fact you can’t see their bodies at all in most of the pics. And yeah the poses they are doing are a little grown up; not sexual really, but grown up in that these are pretty typical poses for grown up models.
So…yeah…maybe just a little too much sex on the mind here?
I’m sorry, but how are you missing it? Very very young girls wearing 6 inch heels? The girl/boy in the first two photo’s LYING on a bed & sitting on a chair with her dress slid up?
The same girl/boy in the last photo’s with her legs up? This isn’t supposed to be “in your face” sexual situations, but “suggestive”. Like the toothbrush is sybmolic for SOMETHING???
Ugh… there is no girl/boy. If you put heavy make up on little kids they are going to look all kinds of awkward. Even like drag queens.
I’m sorry but some of you guys are loosing it…I swear..
@Nova
In high school, an english teacher shared a strange hobby he had with our class. He had a collection of advertisements that “objectified” women. or young children, and he wanted us to see them so we would be aware of some of the messages these things were sending. This particular class was encourage to have lively discussions of all the things we read and wrote about, so I was a little surprised that he would bring up something so prosaic as the “dangers of advertisement.” We were teenagers, but even we knew not to take ads too seriously.
The first time I saw the pictures, honestly, they didn’t strike me as unusual at all; just your typical advertising campaigns. Some of the pictures were a little odd, but ads are suppose to catch your eyes, right?
But then the teacher started pointing out some of the problems. The one ad I thought a bit weird was of a man yelling at a lady’s head.through a megaphone. The extremely oversized megaphone practically covered the lady’s head. The teacher then asked us something I hadn’t considered before: What is that photo saying? Exactly what is the guy in that ad trying to accomplish by screaming at that woman? To buy more of the product?? Really?
The more the teacher spoke, the more my eyes started to pick up what was “a bit odd” about these ads. All of them had some element that hinted that a women/child (and some were deliberately ambiguous on this issue) had value as a sex tool, or something to be controlled.
I’d say they were subtle, but at that age, most things like this would have to be pretty direct to catch my attention; I was one of those kids actually trying to well in school and go to a good college. But I can understand why people would think this inappropriate portrayal would be a stretch. If you’ve never paid much attention to these set of techniques, or are not thinking “sex” and actually have something worthwhile to do besides look at ads, you probably see these as a silly and move on. But the fact that so many other people are picking up on this is a good indication that there is something to this.
I have to admit Nova, I was a bit of a hard sell on this. OK, the megaphone was a bit over the top, but the rest? This was English class, and after I heard how many ways poems could be interpreted, I was skeptical about about interpreting anything at that point. But what really did it for me was a picture of a young girl holding perfume bottles against her chest. Again, all I thought when I first saw the picture was that it seems a bit odd.
The teacher asked us to take a really good look at this picture, and notice where the bottles where being held, what shape they were, and what else the child was wearing in the ad. And then think about this: why were there rounded bottles being held against the young girl’s chest while she was wearing a light beige colored body suit?
Is there some manufacturing process that prevents these bottles from being produced in another shape? There were no other clothing but skin colored leotards in the shoot? The girl couldn’t put the bottle over her head, at arms length, by her feet without spoiling the artistry of the shot? Or maybe, just maybe, folks in charge of the photography wanted to leave you with subtle implication of a ripening young female? It’s not like all these props are just accidentally thrown together, and flash goes the camera.
This was back during the good ole days of stranger/danger when every other kid/teen show was about child molestation. And yes, people still sued others like there was an expiration date on the process. So with all the money available (photo shoots can be quite expensive) and potential lawsuits threatening, you’re really going to get a thinking person to believe they just couldn’t quite make this ad NOT look like some kind of 1950′s kiddy pin-up? I got opened eyes and a turned stomach that day.
Oh my God people, sometimes I lay on my bed with my feet up like that. Does it mean I’m craving cock? NO!
Exactly what way can a woman/girl stand that doesn’t scream “I WANT DICK” is that’s the case? They are standing still looking into a camera, One is laying on her belly, one is sitting up on a bed with her legs closed. Golly, I’ve been in all those positions and I can tell you, once again, sex is probably the furthest thing from my mind.
Seriously, some of you are a getting a little scary…
I believe you Nova.
But here’s the question: While in these poses, did you photography yourself and post them online?
Nowadays, the answer might actually be, Absolutely! But if you did it on MySpace, or any of the myriads of social networks, I guarantee you that at least one person made some kind of lewd comment about it (unless it was perhaps MomonsUnite.com, or something similar). Who knows why you’d publish photos like that, but after the age of no less than 18, you’d have to realized that if you did, there are plenty that absolutely would see them as something sexually suggestive. And hopefully, knowing that the entire internet world could be watching, you would modify the poses at least a bit, unless of course you were trying to get that type of response.
Vogue has been in business for a long time, spending lots of time and money taking pictures to sell magazines. But yet somehow they couldn’t quite predicted something that thousands of high schoolers know instinctively: dressing certain ways produces certain responses, period. Maybe you’re right Nova. If so, that editor badly needed a new job.
They have little children dressed as adults, in sexy clothing, with seductive looks and poses… wtf are you missing, retard. Perhaps you are into this sort of thing, so this is no big deal to you. But for normal thinking adults, this is absolutely disgusting.
Seek help, you child moletor.
you’re right: the only people who cannot see the grotesque in these pictures are the ones who got desensitized to such poses, the ones who are in it…
Um WOW ! These poor babies . I blame their parents their is no way I would allow my little girl to be exploited like this. THey have sick parents. God be with these babies of MK families.
This is sick beyond belief… I think Sodom and Gomorrah’s people were innocent compared to these seriously disturbed satanic animals… Check the last picture, the boy under the tree… he’s the gift!!
They are certainly not suggesting the kids are playing dress-up despite the too big clothes and shoes: the professionally applied make-up strongly indicate adult involvement.
This is just as disgusting as those pageants. I hate the way they dress those little girls up in those too. They could of done it more tastefully.. like cute pictures of a little girls with moms hat and some heels that were too big for them.. or something like that. The sad thing is that these little girls moms probablly didnt think twice about the photoshoot. Those type of mothers are living vicariously through there kids anyway.
This is NOT cute.
This is NOT high fashion.
This IS child abuse. Period.
OMG THIS IS HORRIBLE!!!!!
What the hell were they thinking?! This is pedophile material in a real way. I can’t believe this garbage is actually on the news stands.
I concur with most everything said here – for all to know, the editor of French Vogue, Carine Roitfeld, has been fired a few days ago. Apparently the head of LVMH, a big provider of advertising contracts for Vogue, was not too happy about the bad taste demonstrated by this photo shoot – and for a while now, French Vogue had been publishing editorials too focused on porn-chic style, if you see what I mean. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back. We can only hope the new editor will make saner choices, but….
How absolutely inappropriate…and so sad for those little girls. Where are the adults (aka parents/guardians) who are supposed to PROTECTING their innocence? So sad.
Not that I’m saying it’s ok but the girls are very beautiful little girls but overall this is too disturbing to even focus so much on that fact. All I can ask is, “WHY?”
shame on us we’ve become fearless human beings,, little girl under a tree so this is what santa gives nowadays for X’mas
I think people are reading way too much into this. Granted this shoot is part of the capitalist drive to exploit every market, including the sexualisation of children. However to say that it is pedophilic porn is going too far – it just looks like professional photo shoot of girls dressing up in their mums clothes.
Vive y salud!
You’re a sicko.
vc you have to do an article on jadan & willow smith I just listened to whip my hair in reverse & Im speechless It pretty much sums up that she is a sex slave
i cant even look at this.
This almost brings a tear to my eye. With God and myself and many followers I do beleive the world will be saved one day.
Does anyone else think this is similar to those little girls on those beauty pageant shows? You now, the ones like “Toddlers and Tiaras” where the moms pimp out their daughters in high heels, too much makeup, and short dresses to win trophies an cash prizes? This is similar. And think about all the stars whose parents started them out in modeling when they where infants, and then moved to TV. A prime example is the Oslen twins. You think about it, they never really had a childhood. Lindsay Lohan, Taylor Momsen, oh I could go on. I think someone said something about Spears, of course! All the kids on the Mickey Mouse club started out too young to imagine. The worst part about these pictures is that it’s in a high fashion magazine!!! And I love high fashion, too, but little girls like this should be playing with dolls and crap! Not posing like a woman 3 times her age in a magazine girls her age don’t even read. Too sexy too soon!!! Pedophiles will be all over this.
How far has humanity fallen? Innnocence, which should be protected and cherished is being degraded and explited. Shame.
You need to change your hosting provider (is it GoDaddy) because your site takes entirely too long to load. GoDaddy is known for that problem. This is an Interesting article though. Seems like they’re trying to make people accept pedophilia by introducing it in a form that’s less harmless.
Err… who buys VOGUE magazine ..?
WOMEN do.
And I see one or two women here defending the above photos…
Surely women can go out and buy different and perhaps more down to earth mags? ( And those “he said -she said” GOSSIP mags are just as bad).
After all they used to complain about ‘Playboy’ and ‘Hustler’, so they should be quite capable about bitching about VOGUE too.
Or are the materialistic trinkets shown in these magazines (the baubles and do-dads that you need half a dozen credit-cards to pay for), are they just so enticing that you don’t care what sort of unnatural methods are used to get you to part with money you don’t have.
Women are also the ONLY ones I’ve heard say that homosexual necking depicted on TV is ‘touching’ or ‘ground-breaking’. There’s a whole lot of new sicknesses out there that women fail to see or choose not to see. Don’t let your children be next just because you are a slave to trends!!
No horror movie is as disturbing as these images.
The little girl with the toothbrush in her mouth really pisses me off. Is that supposed to simulate oral sex? DISGUSTING!!!
burn down vogue offices….
i must say they are all beautiful children, but to see them exploited in such a way is just sickening. The beauty pageants people put their children through is no less disgusting than what I’ve seen here. I don’t know about anyone else but I will take time to pray to God about these issues, i mean think about how he could feel towards these innocent children being mentally and sexually manipulated.
What joe said.
Emeralds – Emerald City – Wizard of Oz programming.
Little girl in the mirror – Through the Looking Glass
Positively sickening.
This is all part and parcel of the new world order.
I hope vouge magazine goes belly up for this and never recovers, this is NOT ALLRIGHT NOT ONE BIT!!
http://politicsreport.com/news/american-tax-dollars-funding-child-rape
Please view the movie “They Live”,its an 80s movie about alien programming.
Anyway.
I agree with a post way above about learning techniques on how to catch symbolism,ect.Ive been reseraching mostly online,trying to learn those very techniques.If you don’t know what things mean,you probably wont understand the entire picture.
I did see a pyramid in the mirror pic.
….Most people outside america expect bad,and strive for good,mainly for themselves. Here in america,we are so shocked when something bad happens,yet nothing is done about it.
This type of thing has been going on for years…and still only a small few know whats going on,and those who want to help,have no power.
I as a researcher/investigator…i find it hard to look at many horrifc images such as this,and i know in the future,ill have to view graphic material,but i dont think i’ll ever understand perversion/molestation/rape/torture/incest…although i can understand murder in some cases as to self defense.
……Im tired of being quiet,it seems everyday gets worse…but the more you open up,and see,you can help others open up and see.
….the kids they wish they could get their hands on are indigos,because their energy is psychic…wich is the problem,they’re too alert.They look for kids with self esteem issues and parents of greed and of cloudyness.
This is totally inappropriate and I blame the parents as much as the magazine for this. These photos are to me like pimping out a child. There is absolutely no need for children this young to be photographed in such suggestive poses. It is very clear that Vogue’s actions were irresponsible and careless and disrespectful to the fullest in regards to a child’s innocence. Is it not enough to use pubescent and teenage girls in such a manner?!?!? I don’t even care if most reader’s of the magazine are women. I don’t care that they are not exposed, I don’t give a hoot of whatever excuse the magazine may have of “Artistic freedom” or creativity. There Isn’t any two ways about it… this is wrong straight up!!!
I think it’s cute. To me there’s no such thing as a sexy kid. Some might think these pictures are suggestive because they are adults. But children are innocent and I see them as just that. I don’t care how many make up you put on 6 year olds. They’re still babies. And I still see them that way.
It’s the same with people that complain about young girls wearing bikini’s. There can’t be anything sexual about a child. those people have a problem for seeing it that way. Would I let my daughter pose for a magazine like that? If my husband agrees with me, sure. I’m sure these kids don’t do this on a weekly basis. Neither does the magazine.
ya right…… jill the shill
F****cccckkkk! I have barely seen anything as revolting as this! Excuse me I have to puke.
Trashy editor Carine Roitfeld got fired over this shoot – good riddance. She went too far even for an Illuminati magazine.
Trashy editor Carine Roitfeld got fired over this shoot – she finally went too far even for an Illuminati magazine. Good riddance.
Who would even consider doing some sick shit like this, wtf??!!
They are beautiful girls. It’s France. What do you expect. Some of the poses are too adult themed. But, it’s France. Things there aren’t as taboo, I would imagine. If one likes leopard print does that mean anything all the time? I don’t wear it but I like it and think there are some cute shoes with the print on it.
kudos to the parents on the child rearing
I believe these photos are intended more for an older audience, however the comments about being off putting, sexualized, and even exhibiting traits of lesbianism, are utter “B.S.” As for the comment about the jewels representing sexual abuse, i believe it is an abhorrent comment and one made to re-present pure co-incidence, if that. People will see what they want, perverts or saints… and ultimately only those whom are open to perversion will find sexual behaviour based from their own deviant impulses or fantasies.
You must be one of the pedophiles if you think those photos are appropriate.
It’s a little TOO creepy.
Scratch that, it’s WAY TOO creepy!
This is beyond disgusting…But I’m afraid it is not anything new for the country this mag was published in. We were warned against going the way (culture wise) of certain EU nations. The loss of childhood innocence is somehow conflated with a liberated social conscious… Sad, Sad, times we are in.
What kind of sicko parent would allow their child to pose like that? I feel sorry for those poor little girls.
My heart hurts
Your answer to these pictures and the publishers are in the jewish talmud! Read it! No study it, if you have the stomach for it.
When are mothers going to learn not to sexualize little girls this way. Children like to play dress up, but these pageants and photos are the stuff of dreams for pedophiles. These people can’t control themselves. Give your kid a childhood.
Kaye Cee
Another sickening thing: same butterflies, same Mickey Mouse hat, same Vogue… And androgyny at its most:
If Vogue’s goal was to show children trying to be like their mothers’ or act like ‘grown-ups’, why not have the girls do their own make-up and hair? At least, we would be able to see the awkward side of youth, and it would have been easy to reinforce the idea that children are supposed to be nurtured instead of over sexualized. It would also help explain the “gift” notion as these children are gifts to their parents.
Instead, these children were dressed, and directed to make fierce, ‘sexy faces’.
They were directed and groomed to appear as grown-up as possible. There wasn’t a presence of a maternal or paternal figure in the shoot with them which reinforces the message that children of any age are capable of making the same decisions as an adult.
Here’s a link I found related to signs of a pedophile:
http://www.aupairclearinghouse.com/node/561
In that link, it mentions that a pedophile may communicate with a child in ways that equalize their relationship. So, when others here stress that these pictures are pedophilic in nature, they have a sound argument. With the fact that they are groomed so provocatively and to look so dour, it leads us to suspect that the shoot is purposefully trying to send out a double meaning by associating the children as “gifts”.
Also, the child underneath the Xmas tree looking so lifeless beside other inanimate objects, lends towards objectivization of the child.
As far as artistic freedom is concerned, Brooke Shield’s mother had her pose nude in the 70s. Those pictures are, more than likely, still being viewed by pedophiles.
In some ways with pictures like these, they’re even rationalizing pedophile’s behavior as it is justifying their belief that children are objects of sexualized beauty. And, that they are mature enough to give & receive as any adult.
Pedophiles tend to be very emotionally immature due to their sickness, and I think by having young children dressed and made-up in such a way to appear as an adult may actually encourage or provoke a pederast to act on their drives instead of seek help. While those responsible for these photos are hiding behind artistic freedom, they completely lack an understanding of artistic responsibility.
And, I bet these photos have already made circuits in pedo usenet groups, too.
Found an article that goes into detail regarding the Carine Roitfeld firing. Apparently, Tom Ford designed and edited the controversial issue. He is good friends with notorious Terry Richardson, who has a penchant for young models and even wrote a song called “Child Molester’s Coming For You”. So, everything is not really as it seems when you even take out the deeper connotations (specifically, references to beta programming) of these pictures.
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/women/2011/01/another_assault_on_little_girl.html?
Three candle(pillar) cabala symbol in one pic.
Lit , illumined. Phallic symbol in mirror.
Red,white,black color symbolism.
ders no pictures!! its not loading :O
Vogue Magazine should be questioned for this; people are serving life sentence visiting website, or offering even looking at pictures.
My heart just breaks for these children, especially the last one. This is sick and those of u who dont see it…i feel sry for u.
wow so utterly sickening I actually felt sick looking at these in fact could barely look they are just so disturbing. I really dont understand why people do these things to children. Totally sickening!
sick stuff
Last picture:
what the hell is he/she holding in her hands?
I’m reading through these comments and am only halfway through but I have to say it sounds as though a lot of people have not read any background either on this site, or by doing their own research. Yes, this is tragic, terrifying and evil – and it is happening all around us, and the media makes sure of that. There are so many posters here decrying the parents of the models and talking about the media making it fashionable for children to be sexualised at an earlier and earlier age, but they seem to not be understanding the central point – that being that the parents of these children are working for the Illuminati either directly or non-directly. A lot of people here do not seem to be grasping the fact that all over the [under]world there are populaces of such children bred for these purposes, bred, or sold or kidnapped into these things. The parents are not like you or I.
It is really disturbing to read that some people actually believe that this shoot is simply a game of ‘dress-up’ – and those of you who think that should “Educate Yourselves” first in order to recognise the reality that is in front of you, both on this page and on your TV screens, every day. Perhaps these people are already de-sensitised to the point where they truly can’t see, and perhaps some of these people simply don’t want to believe that the world is really this way. It’s called disillusionment – that is the true meaning of the word, the dissolving of illusion, the dismantling of the illusion, call it what you will – but it would appear some are more attached to the illusion than others, and are not ‘illuminated’ to what is happening and don’t want to be. These are the people who will prove dangerous when it comes to crowd control, law enforcement on citizens of the world. Because they are the sheep who are asleep.
Finally, to speak of these models simply in terms of the shoot itself and how fashion is accessorising children as sexual entities is also minimising a greater issue here – that of mind controlled slaves and programming and splitting of the person. Read Fritz Springmeier he has gone to great length to explain the processes and history to such programs. The only difference these days is that the media has become flagrantly brazen in its attempt to seduce us all with its lustfully perverse symbolism and imagery.
Ever notice how whenever there is a disaster/war on tv you rarely get to see the actually film – they play the images whilst talking over them. This age is all about the image, and your mind absorbs EVERYTHING it sees. You may not remember, but your mind does. It’s like Cormack McCarthy said in his book, “The Road” – “You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget.”
If we all believe in what we see as always “out there” we will always be separated from one another and in a state of hypnosis – under the control of the state.
If we see such images as the above and do not feel alarm bells signalling that something here is wrong, the mission has been accomplished. You no longer know the difference between right and wrong and you are satisfied to be spoon-fed what you are told is right. The sacrifice is reflected in our own lives, as individuals.
Become aware, be conscious, get in touch with your instinct that you are lonely without. Switch off the god damned TV and read a book, sit in silence, listening to your breathing, listen to your child, listen to your inner child, learn to find the space the media has filled and fill it with your own wonder at the life you have. Be grateful and be strong and that way – the bastards can’t bring you down.
This must be a fantasy land brought to reality, just fasten your seat belt…we’re going off!
I thought those pictures were lovely, except for the last two. I think it could be more appropriate but I think the girls in those “beauty pageants” look waaaaaaaaaaaay more sexualized then these girls. At least they were covered up fdor the most part
She looks like she is just modeling.
Don’t see any sexual references here. I think society makes everything some sort of sexual or unlawful act towards children.
So then how should she be photographed? so that is satisfies you?
There good shots. Very professional like all Vogue Shots.
For those who don’t speak french, “cadeaux” means “gifts”. Equally creepy inadvertent meaning much? Like these kids are to be offered up as “gifts”? Ew.
Kudos to the person who said Karine Roitfeld got canned for this. Those Conde Nasties are ridiculous. And yes, having lived in France, I remember seeing fashion spreads like this in mags all the time. Granted, the girls in the shoots were *slightly* older- but not much. The fashion industry is by it’s nature pedophilic, though. I also visited Denmark and I found the sensibility to be the same if not worse- isn’t Scandinavia supposed to be one of the hotspots for kiddie porn/human trafficking?
I would much rather my kid dress up like that then dress up in those awful outfits they wear in Toddlers & Tiaras, those look way more sexualized than this.
this reminds me of JonBenét Patricia Ramsey who was murdered at age 6 and attracted a lot of media coverage. She was enrolled by her mother in a variety of different beauty pageants in several states. The mother even funded some of the contests in which JonBenét participated. Her active role in pageants was highly scrutinized by media following the murder
Hey France – no wonder some women in your country want to wear burkhas, since your population is apparently a bunch of paedophile panderers. How about you make burkhas compulsory so we never have to witness such disgusting child abuse (and hypocrisy) ever again?
Utterly sick and disturbing. In line with US pageants, equally abusive. Everyone PLEASE boycott this magazine, and laws really ought to be in place to protect kids from this exploitations. Horrific.
Seriously I don’t see the big deal.
If you think this will incite pedophiles that’s just stupid pedophiles will go after kids, no matter what.
may be now you would understand why I am so against lowering the culture bar, we must have a standard for the community, you can even call it a moral boundaries that must not be crossed, if we have fourteen year olds having babies and 12 year olds have there vaginas waxed then we will go on looking for the bottom still, we must stop saggy pants and exposed cleavages and shorts with bare butts first or there will be no bottom.
I think that this free of speech has gone too far. You really should put yourself in other ppl’s shoes. That is why, it’s so hard now a days to educate a child. Because what they see outside their home environment is far to corrupt. Therefore is brings a difficult relationship in doors, as parents struggle to set maintaing what is right and what is wrong to their children. Blame the f**** media and the Ellite for this.
Also to the individual who claimed everyone should wear burquas, how is it any better to cover a woman from head to toe? There needs to be some BALANCE here.
can you interpret these pics and support your interpretation with symbols and or anything from the scenes?
or are you just a loudmouth idiot looking for attention?
personally, besides the sex-kitten programming reference I don’t feel like there are many ‘symbols’ in this particular photoshoot, just more of a “lets fuck up people’s minds” goal. the kids, and the people looking at who subconsciously might find this sexy because of how they’ve pictured these girls.. sick.
Other than all of the leopard prints, rabbits (Alice in Wonderland), the ‘green’ girl having a bra on the outside of her shirt, possible lesibanism in the 3rd pic, & the armband (5th pic) and anklet (8th pic) signifying slavery, I don’t seem too much symbolism in this shoot. **kanyeshrug**
One word: JEWELRY.
(And are you kidding me, guys? You don’t see any more symbolism? The RED car on the CHECKERPRINT floor? The WHITE RABBIT? Give them another look.)
No offense but lesbianism? Really? So if your daughter and her friend are playing dress up and you take a picture like that of them, that’s lesbianism? How can you think like that? They’re children! I see this whole thing as little girls playing dress up. I have leopard print shoes. If my little niece wants to play with them, it’s not sex kitten programming. They’re just leopard print shoes. I love this site. But I sometimes feel people read into things to much. Especially this. I don’t care what they’re trying to portray. All I see is little girls dolling up.
No offense but lesbianism? Really? So if your daughter and her friend are playing dress up and you take a picture like that of them, that’s lesbianism? How can you think like that? They’re children! I see this whole thing as little girls playing dress up. I have leopard print shoes. If my little niece wants to play with them, it’s not sex kitten programming. They’re just leopard print shoes. I love this site. But I sometimes feel people read into things to much. Especially this. I don’t care what they’re trying to portray. All I see is little girls dolling up.
Notice all of the girls at least once wear rubies, signalling ritual sexual abuse The older girl has emeralds in one photo, which is appropriate, since she would’ve had more time to prove family loyalty. Look it up, girls who are higher up in the Illuminati families are programmed with jewels.
It’s not little girls dolling up, it’s a photo shoot styled by professional editorial people in an international magazine. The little girls didn’t choose to sexualize themselves to this degree.
Really, Jill? And if Brooke Shields who was I believe 9 or 10 when she filmed Louis Malle’s movie
Pretty Baby playing a child-in-training-to-be-a-prostitute doing the exact same things as these children in the photo shoot- was she “just playing dress up” too? Watch that film and if you aren’t disturbed then by the “just playing dress up” scenes in those movies, I am pretty sure you aren’t reading *enough* into this photo spread. The goal of fashion mags is sexualization and eroticism of the inanimate. Models are not hired to “think”. They are hired to be blank slates, projections of whatever sexuality they are supposed to represent. Do you think child beauty pageants are creepy or “girls just playing dress up”? Because those are prime hotspots for creating Monarch slaves too. I have been a survivor of trauma based programs and I know several women who are in deep Illuminati incest-based Monarch-groomed families and all of them were child models/in beauty pageants or had a mother who did that. This is not a coincidence, and what it most certainly is NOT is “kids just dressing up” Ms. Roitfeld is a stone cold, calculating witch and so is her ex-colleague Anna Wintour. They know exactly what they are doing.
You are an ASS… go watch more TV
Well done, Anya. You couldn’t have said any better!!!!!