#Login Register
The Vigilant Citizen Forums
Cultural Marxism & The End Of Civilization


09-01-2015, 03:01 PM #1
sPEktrall
*****
Chaplain
Status: Offline Posts:1,262 Likes Received:1611
Cultural Marxism & The End Of Civilization

What is cultural marxism?  What are some examples of culture marxism in society and what has it ultimately led to? Is it really as progressive as progressives would believe?  Can you give any examples of how they are propagating this theme in entertainment and the media?  

Prov 15:7 The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.

09-01-2015, 03:38 PM #2
Robert Baird
****
Justiciar
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
The media includes our schooling and is a major means of socializing people. It has been used and abused by all manner of people with every agenda but along with the Internet it is far superior to the pulpit which once was supreme.

In short there is no area of society which is not engineered by policy makers and priesthoods of all warp and woof.

The idea that Marx was trying to upend society of the kind we have had since he wrote his book with Engels - is hard to fathom. The ideas he wrote were a major part of what has freed society from the prior Dark Ages. The use of egalitarian models of government he was in favor of has been influential in freeing women. There is a branch of feminism which looks at how capitalism has enforced inequities on women. Personally I think capitalism is not so much to blame for being aware of various demographics and religious impediments to real equality. Yes, businesses are our most democratic institutions in my opinion.

People who are equating Marxism with Machiavellian agendas or some Hobbesian appeals to all demographics are mistaking cause and effect as I see it. It is more properly described as an Hegelian Dialectic or "playing both ends AGAINST THE MIDDLE".

It does happen and social engineers will use any and all means to get where they think we should be going. Francis Fukayama's The End of History and The Last Man which lead to Bill Clinton thanking him as he moved up the ladder from US Policy maker to the Rand Corporation is a must read.

The link which follows is well thought out but offensive (I could say intentionally) and miserly in references, IMHO.
http://www.returnofkings.com/18998/cultu...matriarchy

09-03-2015, 08:17 PM #3
Robert Baird
****
Justiciar
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
It is certain that our history is a lie. You can argue about the extent of the lie but we know for a fact that destroying books has been done by religions and the nations they created who are still keeping those religions afloat. Yes, the churches could present a value to a community which would be a justification for them not to be taxed on income but that is a stretch, and given the land they were given when the invasion of the Americas took place it is no wonder the Nations are thankful as are the churches. You see the word 'invasion' and you may think back to the mini-series done by Kevin Costner called 'The Invasion of Paradise'.

That was a cover over which detailed almost nothing. But before proving that or that I can demonstrate humans were cultured and had advanced thinking including the ability to travel across the horizon navigating by the stars - A Million YEARS AGO! Before showing how likely it is that our history which gives us credit for being stone-aged (neolithic) people before 8,000 years ago, is not merely wrong but wrong by INTENT! I would like to get agreement that we discuss facts not BELIEFS! Beliefs have been created by those who destroyed the books and outlawed or burned real thinkers.

I leave you with just one little thread to peruse, but it is not really all that relevant except to show that some people do try to make sense of what is going on and why so many say the Pyramids were built by Aliens and the Bible confirms there were giants (Nephilim) etc. Our laws, our nations and our lives are at stake - and the deaths of those who fought the scholastic tyranny of the Dark Ages could be the kind of stake we deserve if we continue to BELIEVE!

http://forum.world-mysteries.com/threads...ads?p=3747
This post was last modified: 09-04-2015, 06:27 AM by Robert Baird.

09-04-2015, 06:14 AM #4
Anna
**
Knight
Status: Offline Posts:84 Likes Received:82
I have read that cultural marxism was created in order to change christian society in such way that it accepted communist revolution. Because christian workers in some countries didn't want to help the communists. And this change of society ended up with ruining of traditional western society. Reading this I wonder why do they continue to change society this way if there is no communist revolution planned.

09-04-2015, 06:44 AM #5
Robert Baird
****
Justiciar
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
Marx correctly said "Religion is the opium of the people".

And because the paradigm social engineers used every religion then and now, as Fukayama confessed, the pulpit pounders did fight 'communism'  because Bolshevism had outlawed them as had the French Revolution which also seized their assets for good reason. In fact the Catholic Church was so anti-communist during WWII it supported Hitler as I referred to their Concordat and as a recent book by the Catholics points out in support of this Pope being made a saint despite them being forced to admit (By a media team) that the Pope worked to get high ranking Nazis to South America and freedom - AFTER the war!  Remember Russia certainly was not communist - Castro may have started out as one = alongside Gandhi and Mandela - if you search for a quadrangle representation pictorially done you will see this.

The social engineers are using any and all means - as they always will to try to get people to behave. As Kissinger pointed out in his speech to the Bilderbergs at Evian, France in the last century. Religious extremism prevents Earth from entering the Intergalactic Brotherhood. He probably was trying to get his listeners to look at Earth and it's racism, wars and treatment of women and children in the eyes of an outsider. But I hate to admit I once thought it was possible this was evidence that aliens do consort with our leaders.

Can you think of a better way than Cultural Marxism (Hegemony or Hegelian Dialectic) than getting religion to change?

09-04-2015, 07:09 AM #6
Anna
**
Knight
Status: Offline Posts:84 Likes Received:82
Russia was not communist yet, but they believed they were changing in that direction.


"Can you think of a better way than Cultural Marxism (Hegemony or Hegelian Dialectic) than getting religion to change?"

Human brain needs some sort of religion. Usually people who gave up their parents' religion become bored with materialism/atheism, even agnosticism and look for some other religion, try to invent something new.
On the other hand I wanted to ask the same question. It is quite hard to invent something better. White heterosexual men don't like this era, but previous era was definitely not perfect and we need some fresh ideas.

09-04-2015, 07:20 AM #7
Robert Baird
****
Justiciar
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
You have some source for this statement that Russia was becoming Communist - UNDER STALIN????

The human soul needs spiritual sustenance but the brain is an easy thing to deceive. Thus churches have INSPIRED themselves to gain power over people. As Arthur C. Clarke said - he could see religion was a necessary evil in managing people - BUT so MUCH evil?

09-04-2015, 09:44 AM #8
Anna
**
Knight
Status: Offline Posts:84 Likes Received:82
(09-04-2015, 07:20 AM)Robert Baird Wrote:  You have some source for this statement that Russia was becoming Communist - UNDER STALIN????
Define communism please, looks like we are talking about different things. I am from former USSR. Not sure, if it is written somewhere, though it could, but I've heard, that they were going to build socialism as the middle link and then communism, and it would be their happy future.
About Stalin - most older people love him and vote for communist party. Sometimes they can joke about good old times that they "lived under communism", but they usually mean 70-s and Brezhnev is their favorite also.

(09-04-2015, 07:20 AM)Robert Baird Wrote:  As Arthur C. Clarke said - he could see religion was a necessary evil in managing people - BUT so MUCH evil?
Theoretically there can be ideal society where religion is not evil and the elites are not evil.

09-04-2015, 10:20 AM #9
Robert Baird
****
Justiciar
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
Yes, that is not only true it may be the only way Earth will survive this century which many wise people say it may not (Not apocalyptic garbage).

I think I posted a thread about Ecumenicism here.

Iesa (Jesus trans) stood for the Brotherhood of Man but the ecclesiasties who put words in his mouth stand for [power over people.

Thus I think good ministers can demand change in government and good government should tax churches who do not build ecumenicism and help society. It worked before Rome and Empire - it can work again. The Cathars were doing a fine job - thus had to be killed.
The following 1 user Likes Robert Baird's post:
  • LongFace

09-04-2015, 11:02 AM #10
umphreak
***
Marshall
Status: Offline Posts:258 Likes Received:516
(09-04-2015, 10:20 AM)Robert Baird Wrote:  Thus I think good ministers can demand change in government and good government should tax churches who do not build ecumenicism and help society. It worked before Rome and Empire - it can work again. The Cathars were doing a fine job - thus had to be killed.

That's pretty disturbing.  You think government should socially engineer religion through taxation to "help society"?  Good grief....
The following 2 users Like umphreak's post:
  • Goku, Vytas