#Login Register
The Vigilant Citizen Forums

Cultural Marxism

09-23-2016, 07:59 AM #1
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
The Bolshevik cancer that has taken hold of the West. 


Quote:Cultural Marxism has been dubbed "the greatest cancer in the Western world" but few even know what it is.

Definition of Cultural Marxism:

Cultural Marxism: An offshoot of Marxism that gave birth to political correctness, multiculturalism and "anti-racism." Unlike traditional Marxism that focuses on economics, Cultural Marxism focuses on culture and maintains that all human behavior is a result of culture (not heredity / race) and thus malleable. Cultural Marxists absurdly deny the biological reality of gender and race and argue that gender and race are “social constructs”. Nonetheless, Cultural Marxists support the race-based identity politics of non-whites. Cultural Marxists typically support race-based affirmative action, the proposition state (as opposed to a nation rooted in common ancestry), elevating non-Western religions above Western religions, speech codes and censorship, multiculturalism, diversity training, anti-Western education curricula, maladaptive sexual norms and anti-male feminism, the dispossession of white people, and mass Third World immigration into Western countries. Cultural Marxists have promoted idea that white people, instead of birthing white babies, should interracially marry or adopt non-white children. Samuel P. Huntington maintained that Cultural Marxism is an anti-white ideology.  Critics of Cultural Marxism have maintained that Cultural Marxists intend to commit genocide against white people through mass non-white immigration, assimilation, transracial adoption and miscegenation.

Notable Cultural MarxistsAntonio GramsciHorkheimer and AdornoHerbert MarcuseFranz BoasIsrael Ehrenberg (aka Ashley Montagu),  Richard LewontinStephen Jay Gould, and Others

Concepts to oppose Cultural Marxism:

Genophilia:  The love of one's own race. A natural instinct that Cultural Marxists want to deny (at least for whites).

Identitarian Religion:  An older form of religion that stresses ancestral obligations.  Adamantly opposed by Christian Cultural Marxists (at least for whites). Throughout nearly all human history, identitarian religion (aka, ethno-religion), has been the norm. 

Leukophobia:  The irrational fear of whites organizing racially.

Nation:  The very word 'nation' (from Latin 'nasci') implies link by blood.  The traditional (non-Marxist) understanding of nation implies racial homogeneity.  (Until very recently Europe has always been racially homogenous and USA, in 1960 census, was 90% white.)

Notable Quotes:

"The very essence of Cultural Marxism is the support of mass immigration / open borders."

"The end goal of Cultural Marxists is white genocide."

"Political correctness is Cultural Marxism."

"Cultural Marxists have taken over the institutions of the media, education, mainstream Christianity (conservative and liberal), law, and finance.  Their goal is the annihilation of Western Civilization in general and white people in particular." 

Quote:What is Cultural Marxism?
William S. Lind
In his columns on the next conservatism, Paul Weyrich has several times referred to “cultural Marxism.” He asked me, as Free Congress Foundation’s resident historian, to write this column explaining what cultural Marxism is and where it came from. In order to understand what something is, you have to know its history.

Cultural Marxism is a branch of western Marxism, different from the Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as “multiculturalism” or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism.”

Cultural Marxism began not in the 1960s but in 1919, immediately after World War I. Marxist theory had predicted that in the event of a big European war, the working class all over Europe would rise up to overthrow capitalism and create communism. But when war came in 1914, that did not happen. When it finally did happen in Russia in 1917, workers in other European countries did not support it. What had gone wrong?

Independently, two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary, came to the same answer: Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interest that Communism was impossible in the West until both could be destroyed. In 1919, Lukacs asked, “Who will save us from Western civilization?” That same year, when he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary, one of Lukacs’s first acts was to introduce sex education into Hungary’s public schools. He knew that if he could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself.

In 1923, inspired in part by Lukacs, a group of German Marxists established a think tank at Frankfurt University in Germany called the Institute for Social Research. This institute, soon known simply as the Frankfurt School, would become the creator of cultural Marxism.

To translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, the members of the Frankfurt School - - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Eric Fromm and Herbert Marcuse, to name the most important - - had to contradict Marx on several points. They argued that culture was not just part of what Marx had called society’s “superstructure,” but an independent and very important variable. They also said that the working class would not lead a Marxist revolution, because it was becoming part of the middle class, the hated bourgeoisie.
Who would? In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question: a coalition of blacks, students, feminist women and homosexuals.

Fatefully for America, when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School fled - - and reestablished itself in New York City. There, it shifted its focus from destroying traditional Western culture in Germany to destroying it in the United States. To do so, it invented “Critical Theory.” What is the theory? To criticize every traditional institution, starting with the family, brutally and unremittingly, in order to bring them down. It wrote a series of “studies in prejudice,” which said that anyone who believes in traditional Western culture is prejudiced, a “racist” or “sexist” of “fascist” - - and is also mentally ill.

Most importantly, the Frankfurt School crossed Marx with Freud, taking from psychology the technique of psychological conditioning. Today, when the cultural Marxists want to do something like “normalize” homosexuality, they do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual (the Frankfurt School’s key people spent the war years in Hollywood).

After World War II ended, most members of the Frankfurt School went back to Germany. But Herbert Marcuse stayed in America. He took the highly abstract works of other Frankfurt School members and repackaged them in ways college students could read and understand. In his book “Eros and Civilization,” he argued that by freeing sex from any restraints, we could elevate the pleasure principle over the reality principle and create a society with no work, only play (Marcuse coined the phrase, “Make love, not war”). Marcuse also argued for what he called “liberating tolerance,” which he defined as tolerance for all ideas coming from the Left and intolerance for any ideas coming from the Right. In the 1960s, Marcuse became the chief “guru” of the New Left, and he injected the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School into the baby boom generation, to the point where it is now America’s state ideology.

The next conservatism should unmask multiculturalism and Political Correctness and tell the American people what they really are: cultural Marxism. Its goal remains what Lukacs and Gramsci set in 1919: destroying Western culture and the Christian religion. It has already made vast strides toward that goal. But if the average American found out that Political Correctness is a form of Marxism, different from the Marxism of the Soviet Union but Marxism nonetheless, it would be in trouble. The next conservatism needs to reveal the man behind the curtain - - old Karl Marx himself.

(The Free Congress Foundation’s website, www.freecongress.org, includes a short book on the history and nature of cultural Marxism, edited by William S. Lind. It is formatted so you can print it out as a book and share it with your family and friends.)
The following 5 users Like Stride's post:
  • MainStreetFatCat, EliasP, irrationalNinja, The Zone, slave_of_God

09-23-2016, 06:59 PM #2
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
More background information on the West's greatest cancer. 

Quote:Cultural Marxism is largely a synthesis of Marx and Freud. It is Marxism as applied in the cultural sphere and the analysis and control of the media, art, theatre, film and other cultural institutions in society, often with an emphasis on class, race and gender.

Shortly after the Russian Revolution, in 1919 the Bolsheviks founded Comintern (the Communist International) to “fight by all available means … for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie for the creation of an international Soviet republic.” 

Two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary, concluded that the Christianised West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order. Gramsci said that Christianity had corrupted the working class and the West would have to be de- Christianised by a “long march through the culture” – starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and the presentation (and revision) of history.

In 1923 Lukacs established the Institution for Marxism in Frankfurt – later known as the Frankfurt School. Lukacs said “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution.  A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”

During the Second World War, the Frankfurt School relocated to various campuses in the  United States and many became influential in American universities. The Frankfurt School’s studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to form the basis of what became known as “Critical Theory.” – the destructive criticism of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, ethno-centrism, conservatism.

Critical Theory repeats over and over this mantra of alleged Western evils: racism, sexism, colonialism, nationalism, homophobia, fascism, xenophobia, imperialism, and of course religious bigotry (only applied to Christianity).

In 1950, Theodor Adorno of the Frankfurt School proposed the idea of the ‘authoritarian personality‘ – claiming that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist, and everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism or free markets needs psychological help.

The Frankfurt School were frustrated at the persistent lack of interest by the Western working class in revolt. Herbert Marcuse asked the question: Who could substitute for the working class as the agent of revolution?

His answer was:  marginalized groups, including black militants, feminists, homosexual militants, the asocial, the alienated and third world revolutionaries represented by the mass murderer Che Guevara.

Cultural terrorism – now called political correctness – was to be waged against white, Christian, capitalist, heterosexual males.

So victim groups were to be defended:  Blacks, women, also now Muslims as alleged victims of “racism“ and “genocide”  and also, more recently, the environment (being raped by white capitalists).
Marcuse’s book ‘Eros and Civilization’ (1955) promoted free love and the pleasure principle – giving rise to the mantra of the late 1960s onward of “Make love not war” and “If it feels good, do it”. 

This in turn led to the drug counterculture of the 1970s – “turn on, tune in, drop out”. This is very subversive of traditional values like the work ethic and the pursuit of excellence. These victim groups are the basis of the gay studies, black studies, women’s studies, peace and conflict studies, etc. departments now infesting universities, along with the “Green Left”.

None of these departments encourages genuine critical thought: they peddle only a one-sided agenda of destructive pessimism about Western culture.

Although the Frankfurt School gradually became autonomous, it continued to receive Soviet support and encoragement.   Communist bookstores in Western countries in those days were full of books promoting gay and lesbian rights, land rights, feminism and the rights of minority groups such as America's blacks and Hispanics. The books, together with Soviet financial and organisational support spawned activist groups, all with a common pro-Communist, anti-American and anti-establishment theme.

Cultural Marxism now riddles the institutions of Western society – universities, and especially the public media.  Its tactic of political correctness – linguistic fascism – now intimidates and suffocates much public discourse.  It afflicts the major political parties, not only the Left.
This post was last modified: 09-23-2016, 07:02 PM by Stride.
The following 1 user Likes Stride's post:
  • slave_of_God

09-23-2016, 07:15 PM #3
The Zone
Status: Offline Posts:410 Likes Received:980
I have just finished two films on this and studying a bit on what forms of Christianity were most affected. There is a lot to take in on this subject which is actually leading me to branch off into more conspired agendas.

The following 3 users Like The Zone's post:
  • EliasP, Stride, slave_of_God

09-24-2016, 10:55 AM #4
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
“Diversity” and “Multiculturalism” Is Largely a Jewish Movement in the West

by Jonas E. Alexis


The western world, at its core, welcomes any individual, regardless of national or ethnic background, who tries to enhance the ideas and principles inherent in the western intellectual tradition for the benefit of society.

As we shall see in a moment, multiculturalism does not appreciate this form of unity. One of the problems with multiculturalism is that it is inherently hostile to the West, and it has not been without its critics.[1]

That multiculturalism is hostile to the West was expressed more vividly in 1988 when Jesse Jackson and a group of Stanford University students began to chant, “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go!”[2]

Ever since Jackson’s protest, the works of Plato, Aristotle, and a host of others have been viewed as almost a relic of the past in many colleges and universities around the country.[3] One writer for the Stanford Review later declared,

“These protests yielded the desired results, as Stanford no longer required courses in Western Civilization and multiculturalism pervaded the curriculum. Still, Stanford has no classics requirements and universities often face claims of having a lack of courses in their curriculums that teach about conservative political thought…

“Specific to Stanford’s case is a core curriculum that does not require students to take Western civilization courses. The Western civilization requirements made students read and analyze texts that formed the groundwork for liberal political systems and modern Western thought.”[4]

It must be said at the outset here that it is foolish to dismiss the people who have established the intellectual tradition of Western civilization, and certainly removing them from the core curriculum was a dangerous move.

I think mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead has a point when he said that the classics give us “a thorough study of language to develop the mind in the regions of logic, philosophy, history and of aesthetic apprehension of literary beauty.”[5]

This is not to say that the words of the shapers of Western civilization must not be questioned. Aristotle for example criticized Plato and rejected some of his views. Reasonable discussion is part of life. I also am not dismissing the works of other people here.

But it is foolish to dismiss the shapers of Western culture as dead “white” male or racist or Eurocentric. Those men were generally concerned with arguments and logical deduction. In the process, they also studied other cultures, as we all should.[6]

 At the same time, we are not suggesting that reading the classics will automatically open one’s mind, but reading them will surely challenge a real student to confront the big issues and questions such as right and wrong, truth and error, outright lies and falsehood.

Allan Bloom’s work, The Closing of the American Mind, has spawned and continues to evoke substantial discussions on this very issue. The book came out in 1987.Like any controversial book, The Closing of the American Mind has been praised and criticized by numerous writers.

One critic accuses Bloom of a “nasty, reactionary attack on the values of young people and everyone else under forty.”[7]

Lawrence W. Levine of George Mason University commented: “We keep hearing romantic calls for the ‘restoration of the classical tradition,’” but a real emphasis on the Great Books “is itself a relatively recent invention.”[8]

Joseph Baldacchino, another critic, writes: “At best, The Closing of the American Mind is a confused book. At worst, it is deliberately subversive, intended to undermine some of the strongest pillars of Western Civilization.”[9]

Some even went so far as to say that Bloom’s diagnosis is “Hitleresque,”[10] forgetting the fact that Bloom was an ethnic Jew. Henry Louis Gates, Jr., a noted Harvard professor, indirectly charges Bloom of being Eurocentric. He writes:

“These two men [Bloom and William Bennett] symbolize for us the nostalgic return to what I think of as the ‘antebellum aesthetic position,’ when men were men, and men were white, when scholar-critics were white men, and when women and persons of color were voiceless, faceless servants and laborers, pouring tea and filling brandy snifters in the boardrooms of old boys’ clubs.”[11]

In the same vein, Ralph Wiley, a proponent of Afrocentricim, charges that Bloom is very narrow-minded in his analysis because he failed to acknowledge the works of people such as Richard Wright, Gwendolyn Brooks, Lorraine Hansberry, and others.[12]

According to Wiley, Bloom reasoned that way “because Black people are not seen by most White people as being within the same value system—a convenient blindness that allows them to think what they like and make it come true.”[13]

Janice E. Hale-Benson, professor of early childhood education at Cleveland State University, writes: “The emphasis of traditional education has been upon molding and shaping Black children so that they can be fit into an educational process designed for Anglo-Saxon middle-class children.”[14]

This sentiment was echoed by many other writers such as June Jordan, Andrew Hacker, Toni Morrison, Bell Hooks, Molefi Kete Asante, and Asa Hilliard.[15] Page Smith, former professor at UCLA, charges:

“‘Western Civilization’ as a required academic subject not only trails its defeats behind it; its basic impulse is retrograde and, is suspect, racist in its inner core.”[16]

As we shall see in the next article, the word “racism,” like “anti-Semitism,” has been weaponized and used so carelessly that people are just scared to death to say that the emperor hath no clothes.

 What is Multiculturalism?


Angela Merkel

German chancellor Angela Merkel declared that the multiculturalist idea promoted by many utopians simply does not work in the real world.[17] It took Dorothy Rabinowitz of the Walll Street Journal twenty years to realize that the “mulitcuaralism” or “diversity” which she had hoped was true was indeed nonsense; her epiphany came in February 2011 after the incident in Texas with Major Hasan.[18]

Let us be clear here. If “diversity” means that people should be cherished for who they are, regardless of color or creed, then it is reasonable, logical, and displays common sense. If “diversity” means lowering test scores or implementing affirmative action in order to bring in a “diversity” of people, then it is irrational, unreasonable, and should be rejected.

Moreover, if “diversity” is used as a means to irrationally deconstruct Western culture and elevate demonstrably false ideas, then cultural conflict is not far behind.

Affirmative action in particular has been a vehicle in the culture war. It has never worked in the real world, instead creating havoc in the academic world in foreign countries such as India, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and even Nigeria.[19]

Let me give an example to make sure that I am not being misrepresented, “The U.S. Department of Justice recently ordered Dayton, Ohio’s police department to lower its written exam passing scores so as to have more blacks on its police force.”[20] This is not diversity; this is complete foolishness.

But this is this kind of multiculturalism that has been promoted over the past few decades by many in academia, and it has generated rational anger among thinking people for good reason.[21]

Even people like Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Walter E. Williams, have been implicitly characterized as sell-outs because they provide rational refutation of this “multiculturalism” madness.[22]

Yet this issue will simply refuse to go away until ideologues stop using “race” as an excuse for reaching political or ideological ends. The flip side of affirmative action is that whenever affirmative action is used to get non-qualified students into colleges and universities, often students who had a higher score get ignored.[23] In recent time, the Abigail Fisher case is a classic example.[24]

In a nutshell, affirmative action essentially rejects equal opportunity. Some are favored or denied because of their race. If there is one thing that I agree with Martin Luther King, Jr., it is the view that a man should not be judged by the color of his skin but by the content of his character.

If we take this seriously, currently many whites and Asians are being judged by the color of their skins when it comes to college admissions. This is certainly not fair and everyone ought to be playing by the same rule.[25] Even a Zionist shill such as former presidential candidate Herman Cain had an ounce of sense to say that affirmative action was a bad move.[26]

Multiculturalism is also based on the relativistic idea that all cultures are equally valid. In other words, in “primitive” cultures some people might sacrifice children or promote polygamy,[27] while other cultures might uphold family and monogamous marriages.[28]

Multiculturalism implicitly states that child sacrifice and family values, polygamy and monogamy, are equally valid. Yet whenever these lines of reasoning are applied, they always end up in cultural relativism.

If cultural relativism were true, it certainly would undermine many historical, scientific and technological enquiries, including anthropology, and the United Nations would have to close down its offices for good.[29] We will come back to this issue in an upcoming article.

If “diversity” was intended to elevate Western values—sticking to reasonable and defensible principles—probably no right-wing American would object to it, not even Patrick J. Buchanan.[30] read full article Here
The following 3 users Like Stride's post:
  • MainStreetFatCat, EliasP, slave_of_God

09-24-2016, 07:40 PM #5
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
Fox News Contributer Defends Hitler, Calls Out Frankfurt School Jews as the Root of Our Ills

Chuck Woolery, former game show host and Fox News contributor, just went on to talk about the Hollywood actor-filled Joss Whedon ad against Trump – and attacked cultural Marxism and DEFENDED ADOLF HITLER.

Here are the statements:

Quote:    When the cultural Marxists get together in their sheep pen … it’s like they all follow each other because they’re afraid to do anything else. I guarantee you, I don’t know all of these people, I’m not sure I know any of them, however, I know the culture, I lived there 45 years, I know what it’s like. You do it for one reason, one is you want to work, the other is it’s not important to know anything as long as someone has a teleprompter in front of you to give you the lines to say.


    There’s got to be kind of a backlash against this. It’s really what probably Trump’s candidacy is all about and we all know that. But it’s this massive backlash agains this PC, which, you know, no one knows where this stuff came from, it just kind of – PC just kind of appeared. Well, it didn’t. It was the Frankfurt School is where it appeared. And the Frankfurt School, it’s a real interesting little piece. Frankfurt School was in Germany obviously, brought on PC, [sic] .... By the second World War, Hitler was such an anti-communist that the Franklin School had to move – prolly the Frankfurt School – so they moved here, to the Columbia University Campus. You will find the Frankfurt School on Columbia’s property. That’s where political correctness came from.

    I like the history of all of this stuff, so that I understand what’s happening today. I want to know who my enemy is. Our enemy is cultural Marxism. And that’s with Hollywood, with everything.

This is just glorious.


Things have changed so, so much. This is one step away from saying straight up “Hitler was right about these Jews.” Look at the way he doesn’t even bother to insert the caveat of “oh well of course Hitler was such an evil guy, but…” He just basically says “Hitler didn’t want them destroying his country so they fled to ours.”

“Frankfurt School” means “Jews.” Every member of the Frankfurt School was Jewish, and their agenda was a completely Jewish tribal agenda, something which has been examined at length by Dr. Kevin MacDonald (there’s also a pretty detailed Wikipedia page).

And this isn’t something like “liberalism,” where “conservatives” can say “well, yes, there are a lot of Jews involved in liberalism, but it isn’t all Jews…” It’s not even like the neoconservative movement, which is almost entirely Jewish, but where you have to say “oh well, Cheney and Rumsfeld were goyim…”

No. Every member of this organization was a Jew. It epitomized Jewry.


This is where the basic concepts of Western civilization as a disease came from. Woolery is 100% correct in his assertions here. It was a program to destroy Western civilization and it worked.

Under the umbrella of “Critical Theory,” these Jews gave us such great ideas as:

    Sexual liberation
    Gender theory
    Gay Rights
    Racial equality
    Black liberation

The entire 1960s social revolution program came directly from these Jews.

Most likely, Woolery got this information from William S. Lind’s 1999 documentary “Political Correctness: The Frankfurt School (alternately titled “The History of Political Correctness”), which was picked-up by Tea Partiers in the late 00s.

Certainly, many who watched that documentary and recognized its truthfulness are not necessarily anti-Semitic. Woolery may or may not be up on the IQ. The point is that when you understand that all of these ideas came directly from Jews, who identified strongly as Jewish and viewed their work as a part of the Jewish Tikkun Olam agenda – and even realize this was why Hitler had such a problem with these people – you are literally one step away from grasping the entire picture of what is going on on planet earth in the year 2016.

The maker of the above documentary himself has said that the Frankfurt School was “Jewish, to a man.”

Byron Jost made a better version of the same documentary which calls out the Jews by name and features Kevin MacDonald entitled “Minority Rule: The Rise of Political Correctness.”

This clip on Fox News was pro-Hitler and anti-Semitic, just using different language.

The patriots are Winning

Be extremely weary of any of these people who are attempting to steer the Alt-Right away from the Jewish question at this crucial juncture. The Jews are 100% aware of what is going on, they know how close they are, and that is why we see this concerted attempt to redirect the movement. 

It all seems to center around the Jewish homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos.

And it involves the feds. Anyone who doesn’t think there are feds in this movement is being dangerously naive. Just look at the history of pro-White movements in America. Most of them ultimately ended up being led by feds. In the past, the purpose was to lead people into violent acts, or agreeing to do violent acts, but at this point, because we’re on the internet, the goal is to breakup or redirect the movement.
This post was last modified: 09-24-2016, 07:41 PM by Stride.
The following 3 users Like Stride's post:
  • MainStreetFatCat, slave_of_God, EliasP

09-24-2016, 09:02 PM #6
Status: Offline Posts:465 Likes Received:645
100% insightful topic. I've saved the page, I'll likely be studying this tonight.

Edit: finished reading. It's hard to believe there are people advocating this.
This post was last modified: 09-25-2016, 01:38 AM by EliasP.

My Worldview
America's Foundation - The Origin of Mankind Pt. 1, Pt. 2

The following 2 users Like EliasP's post:
  • slave_of_God, Stride

09-25-2016, 01:29 AM #7
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
Cultural Marxism is indeed a Bolshevik cancer.

Adolf Hitler was indeed right about them.
The following 2 users Like Stride's post:
  • slave_of_God, EliasP

09-26-2016, 10:16 PM #8
Status: Offline Posts:97 Likes Received:202
Okay, so the cultural Marxism is putting stress on society.... what is the next milestone?

Is Trump the next Hitler then, the guy who will light the culture bomb that they have armed? 

Is the whole world the cultural experiment, or just the USA or Europe?   And who are those who are to be culturally "expelled".  Muslims? 

I fear it's not just Muslims, but all Monotheists.  Or, is this just the next stage in increasing the pressure cooker of cultural homogeneity?

I always thought that the measure of a man was learning how to take responsibility for himself and his actions. When did the act of fellatio become the decider?
- - TheFallenAlchemist

The world has lost the power to blush over its vice; the Church has lost her power to weep over it.
- - Leonard Ravenhill
The following 2 users Like gcha8e's post:
  • slave_of_God, Stride

09-27-2016, 07:58 AM #9
Status: Offline Posts:1,267 Likes Received:1907
Trump is no Hitler. Trump is Jew controlled and Adolf Hitler was the good guy in WWII and fought to free Europe of Bolshevism, destroy Jewish power by printing his own currency backed by the labour of the German people and to expel Jews from Europe by forced immigration. 

He only became the most lied about and demonised man in history because the Jew controlled USA / UK / France ganged up against him with the Jewish controlled Soviet Union to destroy Germany, which was the last nation / empire to stand in the way of Jewish global domination and preserve white European Christian culture.  It was 6 times the population against Germany and Germany almost won.

So no, Trump is no Hitler.

Cultural Marxism needs to be banished and every time someone cucked with the PC / SJW mental illness calls names because you don't agree with their brainwashed views designed to destroy white European Christian society you need to stomp on them and their destructive insane views. 

You have to ignore the fact that they're too stupid to realise how badly they've been played and they're just a shabos goy.  But it's very much time to call them out, stomp on them and destroy the pox of cultural Marxism. .
This post was last modified: 09-27-2016, 08:17 AM by Stride.
The following 3 users Like Stride's post:
  • Freetoday, slave_of_God, EliasP

09-27-2016, 08:04 AM #10
Status: Offline Posts:465 Likes Received:645
Hitler -
"As soon as a nation has so far lost its courage as to submit to this impudent defamation on the part of the Jews it renounces the most important source of its own inner strength. This inner force cannot arise from a policy of pandering to the masses but only from the worship of men of genius, whose lives have uplifted and ennobled the nation itself."

Adolf Hitler placed great emphasis on the worship of heroes, it's all over Mein Kampf and alluded to in a November 12, 1944 speech.

While I was away from here, I was researching the concept of hero worship. After much study, I now realize the necessity of this, as it leads to an emulation of the hero. That is the purpose of worship in general, you clothe yourself with the person you idealize.

My Worldview
America's Foundation - The Origin of Mankind Pt. 1, Pt. 2

The following 2 users Like EliasP's post:
  • slave_of_God, Stride