It could be, and then it actually could be total BS.
i have my reserves about sudden claims that fit a new agenda or theory.
For example, first, the moon rocks had different oxygen isotopes. this was a scientific claim,
mind you. knowing how 'scientists' are vicious on protecting their claims, if you'd doubt such
a thing back then, you'd be hammered a fool.
what happens now? suddenly there is the claim the isotopes are the same. well it can't be both,
now can it? so the real question here is, what was the first claim about? something thus is not
right here. if you'd ask me, this new theory fits a 'new' agenda better and thus suddenly 'science'
changes its dogmas for their own benefit. typical.
either way, i'd go as far as to ask another question; why does two objects having the same oxygen
isotopes define it into being 'from the same origin'? I'm not saying thats impossible, but i'm merely
emphasising that all planets could have the same oxygen isotopes.
but of all things, i find the biggest doubt originating in the claim 'the astronauts from the apollo moon
landings took these moon rocks with them'.
first of all -> i have extreme doubt any astronaut EVER set foot on the moon, let alone get passed the
van allen belt. so if no astronaut went there, no apollo mission took it from there, so it dit not get aquired that way.
second of all -> the apollo missions happened decades ago. and only now all of the sudden a new finding erupts from these decades-old materials that must have been investigated thoroughly decades ago? why the sudden investigation and shift of theory?
third of all -> these materials being here decades atleast, could the oxygen isotopes not be influenced by their decade-old stay on earth, thus 'polluting' them so to speak?
fourth of all -> since i dont believe astronauts set foot on the moon, these objects are either non-lunar, or if actually lunar, they must have come here through being lunar debris resulting in lunar impacts from other 'heavenly' bodies.
so if that is the case - not impossible - then a) are they the actual lunar materials, or are they from the heavenly body that hit the moon? or b) if this indeed is lunar debris, then wouldn't the impact, the travel, passing through earths atmosphere, and landing on earth, and perhaps being on earth for thousands of years before being 'discovered' as lunar material by 'scientists' - then would these events influenced and polluted the material?
so in conclusion;
i think it's as bullshiz as usual, and its merely uncontrolled, unwatched, and uncorrectable science claims that only fit a behind-the-scenes agenda for the scientifical community that adapts itself through lies, decieve, deciet and veils to further their agenda.
# reminds everybody for example about the dutch SCIENCE team that once recieved a lunar rock for science research and who came up with many science 'novelties' whilst the actual truth was these scientists NEVER were given lunar material [proven] but their claims and discoveries ACTUALLY REMAIN.
# reminds everybody on science's decievings in the 'evolution' of species on delibaretly putting different species on year-incorrect display to decieve people in having proof how a monkey turned into a human
# reminds everybody the totally debunked and exposed lie of the 'piltdown man' who is still used as scientific proof whilst it is nothing but a exposed 100% fraud.
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout ‘Save us!’ And I'll whisper ‘No