#Login Register
The Vigilant Citizen Forums

The Concave Earth Theory

01-23-2016, 12:13 AM #1
Status: Offline Posts:256 Likes Received:168
You all heard about the flat Earth theory which was a failure. But few do know that there is also a third model called the concave Earth theory. Unfortunately, some material in this presentation will be hard for you to comprehend, but I have to present you this material anyway due to its importance. Here, I will show you why you shouldn't trust space agencies, debunk flat Earth theory, critize ball Earth theory and make a presentation for the concave Earth theory.

Can we trust space agencies?
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files...as_dxm.png (The word "SEX", on the left side.)
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files...e_west.jpg (Compare this picture with the next picture.)
http://www.frugalsmile.com/plutopluto.png (Pluto, from the cartoon, on the planet Pluto.)
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassin...07966.html (The eerie sounds of Saturn.)
http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddar...hrise-2015 (The Earth from the moon. It looks like a CGI.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAPBRvd8OTY (The first spacewalk looks like a cartoon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7r2T1ggBn8 (The first US space walk looks windy.)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xrrlGaoD_Qw/Uf...-Logos.jpg (Could this mean that the space agencies around the world are owned by one agency?)

The Earth is not flat
The flat Earthers had some intresting arguments, but the truth is that the Earth can't be flat. Here are some reasons:
* https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirror...58ded7.gif (View of CN Tower of Toronto from a distance.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNGorPyX9OQ (Ship is sinking behind the horizon.)
* Southern celestial pole is rotating clockwise and northern celestial pole is rotating counterclockwise.
* If the Earth was flat, it would take much longer time to see the Sun at the edges of the Earth because the circumference value will continue to increase as we move from the center of the Earth towards the edge of the Earth.
* Antarctica is not a place filled by patrolling military:
http://www.usap.gov/jobsAndOpportunities/ ("USAP deploys roughly 3,000 people to Antarctica every year to conduct scientific research".)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...on_Map.png (Research stations in Antarctica.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_a..._Antarctic (About military activity.)

Problems with our current Earth model and other related issues
* If you wish to describe our nature with Einstein's theories then you should take a look at this following material:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tB3IBXTgEc (""I Am No Einstein!" | Space News".)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws ("Elegant Math and Failed Theory | Space News".)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.3404.pdf?origi...ion_detail (Conflict with the broader philosophical principle of relativity.)
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/TimeDilation.htm (Time dilation must be impossible.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBKZOl_dRlQ (Properties of light, part 1. He states that the particle form of the light, the photon, is electromagnetism with dielectric pulse acting like a mass. This stands in contrast with Einstein's description photoelectric effect, but I can't tell you about what this has to do with his other theories.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUMP6-Gos2I (Properties of light, part 2.)

* Why does the ball Earth model not follow the mathematical formula for the calculation of distance to the horizon? Why the objects lying behind the horizon doesn't tilt back?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr0OJLRDq7s (Observation of the curvature.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOTTT-DuFmQ (Chicago on the horizon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAWAHAEvAzc (Chicago time-lapse.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTFEu-Tod7s (Chicago time-lapse 2.)
http://discoverstjoseph.blogspot.se/ (View of Chicago from St Joseph.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EgobyiimKE (Laser experiment.)
https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirror...4ba8ee.jpg (The yacht should have an apparent back tilt.)
(Some useful concepts: Mirage, superior mirage, Fata Morgana, looming, atmoshperic refraction.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon#/m...stance.png (For the calculation of the distance to the horizon.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon#Ef...refraction (About the atmospheric refraction.)
Example (link 1):
The observer is positioned close to the sea level and looks at an object at a distance of 11 km. Atmospheric refraction, with standard atmospheric condition, can cause the visible distance to be extended by 8%. If we are going to include the atmospheric refraction in our calculation, the actual distance to an object will be 11/1,08=10,2 km. If the observer wants to see an object positioned at the sea level, then the observer needs to have a height of (10200/3570)^2=8,2 m above the sea level. Watching that video, you will see that this result doesn't correspond with the reality.
(Mathematical calculations for the distance of horizon doesn't correspond with the reality and the objects do not appear to tilt back. I wouldn't say that these phenomenons could be explained away with the concepts I listed above, yet I can't completely rule out that possiblity.)

* Why do we can't prove the existence of the curvature on the horizon without relying us on the space agencies?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQITXbcz2hg (Weather balloon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCAnLxRvNNc (Weather balloon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWUZDOQm_HE (Weather balloon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnzUgKZ8m2k (Weather balloon.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1vmVJKqUFE (NASA spacecraft at an altitude of 143 km and no curvature.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon#Cu...he_horizon (For the calculation of the curvature.)
[If we exclude the calculation problems (e.g. clouds and refraction of light), then we should be able to see a 6 degree curvature at 35 km altitude. Camera can play a significant role on the appearance of the curvature and this makes it hard to draw a solid conclusion. If the NASA video is real, then we should able to see a 12 degree curvature, provided that we ignore the calculation problems. I can't draw a solid conclusion due to those problems I mentioned.
Here, it is stated that one should be able to see a curvature at the height of around 10600 m:

* Why do we always see the same side of the moon? Did it just happen to be that the moon rotates and orbits in perfect harmony so that we always see the same side of the moon? It is also intresting to point out that the sun and the moon have almost identical size during a solar eclipse. But there is a problem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lkz_JHuHrBI (Strong variation of the moon's size.)

The concave Earth theory
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC79vDkb-1c (Model of the concave Earth.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IinxfgwR0w (The rectilineator documentary.)
* http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70...n83OC9.png (Bending of light.)
http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70...Cpa9B1.png (Light in the concave Earth.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i63LLOVBzlk (3D simulation of the horizon.)
* http://engineering.stanford.edu/news/tam...trol-light (Bending of light.)
* http://www.wildheretic.com/bendy-light-the-evidence/ (Bending of light.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=001IXnp0ogc (Amateur rocket stops suddenly up in the sky. I'm not really sure if it did hit something or it was stopped by some other way.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-nvuTSP3z4 (Glass in the sky.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8tnx88dhs4 (Glass in the sky .)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uziAafdZVpM (Quadruple rainbow.)
* http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70...691_06.png (Birefringence.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KAHDlpN0do (Polarization of the glass sky.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgtTUB_-mc8 (Explanation for the blue color of sky.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsSxsCuHXMI (The moon.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xypm-XKw4_A (The planets.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUnc_HjBcT4 (The stars.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEDh9JcSiRA (Dark matter and the sound of the stars.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0RiLixkftE (Bipolar nebulae.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxIKwOfPkU (Gegenschein.)
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOPo46UOgX4 (An octahedron in the celestial sphere.)

* http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70...age550.jpg (Logo.)
* http://welcome-to-concave-earth-forum.70...7/dell.png (Logo.)

There is a possibility for the Earth to be concave shaped. We can't trust the space agencies regarding this big question because it is apparent that they aren't serious with their work and we should be careful and not be afraid to question the conventionally accepted descriptions of our nature. More proofs and more clarity is required in order to draw a solid conclusion.
This post was last modified: 03-19-2016, 05:49 PM by Mint05.

01-23-2016, 02:15 AM #2
Status: Offline Posts:1,958 Likes Received:2253
Holy mother of deities, these threads are stupid af
The following 7 users Like FlixKandish's post:
  • truthseeker, Loki, sophiaponders, TonyVanDam, Riddler, Goku, cameronjcw

01-23-2016, 02:29 AM #3
Status: Offline Posts:939 Likes Received:831
Quote:No stupid posts please!

Good one, lol.
The following 3 users Like Thunderian's post:
  • truthseeker, Riddler, Goku

01-23-2016, 04:40 AM #4
Status: Offline Posts:732 Likes Received:1383
For me personally all three theories are wrong...Yet if we are to judge by our current abilities we have now, there is only one fitting option and it is off course round earth.. I have no idea if you read/watched all links you posted here , but if you did, you really spending a lot of energy wrong way...
Its probably a stupid post...by your standards...im sorry...
This post was last modified: 01-23-2016, 04:41 AM by Vytas.

Truth is precious it's guarded by God
The following 2 users Like Vytas's post:
  • Tarikko, Scimitar

01-23-2016, 01:38 PM #5
Status: Offline Posts:1,911 Likes Received:4353
@ op, you do know this concave earth has been debunked already in one of our threads regarding the bullshiz FE
and that i LITERALLY PREDICTED that the next step was to start posting CONCAVE EARTH threads?

ugh. this is so bS.

and you must be a special form of stupid to believe you aren't looking straight but with a curve Big Grin

"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout ‘Save us!’ And I'll whisper ‘No
The following 1 user Likes Riddler's post:
  • sophiaponders

01-23-2016, 01:41 PM #6
Status: Offline Posts:1,911 Likes Received:4353
matter of fact, here is that very post i predicted with


(01-17-2016, 11:35 AM)Riddler Wrote:  oh and for you flatearthers,
i know your next move
its here already so you can fck your own minds with your tiny sausages and prepare with these vids and theories to spread out in a topic or a topic of 10, despite its all bs
have fun idiots.

f*cking idiots
This post was last modified: 01-23-2016, 01:44 PM by Riddler.

"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout ‘Save us!’ And I'll whisper ‘No
The following 3 users Like Riddler's post:
  • Tarikko, cameronjcw, Scimitar

01-23-2016, 02:33 PM #7
Grand Commander
Status: Offline Posts:5,735 Likes Received:11513
The earth is a sphere, anyone with two braincells to rub together can cause that spark of understanding the earth is a sphere.

What I fail to understand is what these PTB get in making us believe the earth is a sphere or flat?

It makes no difference at all... so these flat earthers are beating a dead horse, really.

It's so illogical to go down this route of attmepting to disprove the model of a spherical earth, the flat earthers don't even know why they are doing it - they just have a problem with authority. Which I can understand... but to take it this far is really beyond me to grasp lol.


Out beyond ideas
of wrong-doing,

and right-doing,

there is a field...

...I'll meet you there.

Jalaluddin Rumi
The following 1 user Likes Scimitar's post:
  • Tarikko

01-23-2016, 02:50 PM #8
Status: Offline Posts:1,911 Likes Received:4353
i think it's rather a game. a test.
like boston. like paris. taking it one step further and further to see 'how far' they are and need to go to fraud the people into believing something fake or untrue. to control the masses. to convince them, and how much it takes and how to achieve that.

what better to 'force' or 'push' conspiracists, whom in general tend to inform themselves a tad better then the general population, and are more critical thinkers then others, to fool or persuade them into believing something like this.

if they can achieve that, then they recognise and reach a pattern.

it is ultimately what satan wants; to create a false image of peace. to fool people into having created an utopia.

these shills dont even know they're being used indirectly.

"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout ‘Save us!’ And I'll whisper ‘No
The following 2 users Like Riddler's post:
  • Tarikko, Scimitar

01-23-2016, 10:22 PM #9
Status: Offline Posts:256 Likes Received:168
(01-23-2016, 04:40 AM)Vytas Wrote:  For me personally all three theories are wrong...Yet if we are to judge by our current abilities we have now, there is only one fitting option and it is off course round earth.. I have no idea if you read/watched all links you posted here , but if you did, you really spending a lot of energy wrong way...
Its probably a stupid post...by your standards...im sorry...
No, I'm not spending my energy in the wrong way. If you think this is stupid, then explain me why doesn't the ball Earth model follow the mathematical calculation to the horizon, even if we include the atmospheric refraction? But the concave Earth model do solve this problem and bending of light is possible:
This post was last modified: 02-07-2016, 08:27 AM by Mint05.

01-23-2016, 10:26 PM #10
Status: Offline Posts:256 Likes Received:168
Seriously, what's wrong with you? The only stupid thing in this thread are people calling something stupid without knowing anything about it.

And I do have some degree of understanding about the things I've posted here. I didn't just throw some bunch of links to waste your time. Do your homework and it will make sense.
This post was last modified: 02-07-2016, 08:28 AM by Mint05.