#Login Register
The Vigilant Citizen Forums
Postmodernism and luciferianism


06-11-2015, 07:04 PM #1
sophiaponders
*****
Chaplain
Status: Offline Posts:1,315 Likes Received:2148
IMHO Postmodernism is yet another philosophy which luciferians use. It fits along quite perfectly with their deceptions (reality vs unreality/ true vs false) defamiliarization, absurd 'acts', games, and overall obsession of deconstructing reality into something else (-where evil is good and good is evil/black is white and white is black, of course-) or sometimes even trying to deconstruct it into nothing at all.

2) (copied from wikipedia) Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, including the assertions that postmodernism is meaningless and promotes obscurantism. For example, Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge. He asks why postmodernist intellectuals do not respond like people in other fields when asked, "what are the principles of their theories, on what evidence are they based, what do they explain that wasn't already obvious, etc.?...If [these requests] can't be met, then I'd suggest recourse to Hume's advice in similar circumstances: 'to the flames'."

Christian apologist William Lane Craig has noted "In fact, a postmodern culture is an impossibility; it would be utterly unliveable. People are not relativistic when it comes to matters of science, engineering, and technology; rather, they are relativistic and pluralistic in matters of religion and ethics. But, of course, that's not postmodernism; that's modernism!"

Formal, academic critiques of postmodernism can also be found in works such as Beyond the Hoax and Fashionable Nonsense.

Philosopher Daniel Dennett declared, "Postmodernism, the school of 'thought' that proclaimed 'There are no truths, only interpretations' has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for 'conversations' in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster."
This post was last modified: 06-11-2015, 07:30 PM by sophiaponders.

*************************************
If you are interested in Palestine feel free to join my group https://www.facebook.com/groups/101464189944996/
**************************************

06-11-2015, 08:31 PM #2
sPEktrall
*****
Chaplain
Status: Offline Posts:1,262 Likes Received:1611
(06-11-2015, 07:04 PM)sophiaponders Wrote:  IMHO Postmodernism is yet another philosophy which luciferians use. It fits along quite perfectly with their deceptions (reality vs unreality/ true vs false) defamiliarization, absurd 'acts', games, and overall obsession of deconstructing reality into something else (-where evil is good and good is evil/black is white and white is black, of course-) or sometimes even trying to deconstruct it into nothing at all.

2) (copied from wikipedia) Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, including the assertions that postmodernism is meaningless and promotes obscurantism. For example, Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge. He asks why postmodernist intellectuals do not respond like people in other fields when asked, "what are the principles of their theories, on what evidence are they based, what do they explain that wasn't already obvious, etc.?...If [these requests] can't be met, then I'd suggest recourse to Hume's advice in similar circumstances: 'to the flames'."

Christian apologist William Lane Craig has noted "In fact, a postmodern culture is an impossibility; it would be utterly unliveable. People are not relativistic when it comes to matters of science, engineering, and technology; rather, they are relativistic and pluralistic in matters of religion and ethics. But, of course, that's not postmodernism; that's modernism!"

Formal, academic critiques of postmodernism can also be found in works such as Beyond the Hoax and Fashionable Nonsense.   

Philosopher Daniel Dennett declared, "Postmodernism, the school of 'thought' that proclaimed 'There are no truths, only interpretations' has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for 'conversations' in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster."

The Bible makes mention that doctrines of demons will have sway over the collective train of thought in the latter days.  There are two spirits active in the world, the spirit of God and the spirit of Antichrist.  Satan has legal jurisdiction over the multitudes and controls them whether they realize it or not, because anyone who has not the spirit of God adheres to "the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience"

The scripture implies that Satan dictates the course of this world.  If you look at the ancient civilizations you will notice that worship of the gods, human sacrifice, and sorcery were present.  These are all symptoms of a demonized society, or a culture bound, influenced, and dictated by demonic powers.  The trends of these pagan cultures came from the kingdom of darkness.  Nothing has really changed, even America serves it purpose as the military arm of the NWO.  Taxpayers are having their earnings sucked dry and it all goes to the nuts and bolts framework of building the beast system.  The only reason America isnt a society rife with voodoo, witchcraft, and shamanism like regions in Africa and other third world countries is, because Satan needs the industrialized world to bring about global governance.

Prov 15:7 The lips of the wise disperse knowledge: but the heart of the foolish doeth not so.

06-12-2015, 02:46 AM #3
Distracto
Peasant
Status: Offline Posts:5 Likes Received:0
Wow,  so eloquently stated

06-12-2015, 05:48 PM #4
MinutemanX
*
Squire
Status: Offline Posts:47 Likes Received:40
Chesterton had it right when he said we've exhausted reason- we have questioned the existence of thought itself.  Now we're left with a society that  contradict themselves at every turn, not knowing who or what they are and why and what they believe.  Take the statement- "There are no truths" - except of course for that one!  This bit of Chestertons was brilliant:

“But the new rebel is a sceptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be really a revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciations implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it. Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of women, and then he writes another book (about the sex problem) in which he insults it himself. He curses the Sultan because Christian girls lose their virginity, and then curses Mrs. Grundy because they keep it. As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and the, as a philosopher, that all life is waste of time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a policeman for killing a peasant, and then prove by the highest philosophical principles that the peasant ought to have killed himself. A man denounces marriage as a lie, and then denounces aristocratic profligates for treating it as a lie. He calls a flag a bauble, and then blames the oppressors of Poland or Ireland because they take away that bauble. The man of this school goes first to a political meeting, where he complains that savages are treated as if they were beasts; then he takes his hat and umbrella and goes on to a scientific meeting, where he proves that they practically are beasts. In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite sceptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines. In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling morality; in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men. Therefore the modern man in revolt has become practically useless for all purposes of revolt. By rebelling against everything he has lost his right to rebel against anything.”
This post was last modified: 06-12-2015, 06:04 PM by MinutemanX.