#Login Register
The Vigilant Citizen Forums

Bush and other criminals

09-24-2015, 09:51 PM #1
Robert Baird
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
General Douglas MacArthur's Disappearance

 Former CIA Director James Woolsey and Bennett are out and about in 2003 telling the truth about the Cold War being properly called World War Three. Just as the current war on terror is WWIV and will continue to be. MacArthur did not want that to happen and he was ready to use the A-Bomb to end the Korean War. He had to be replaced - that kind of sensible action (A-Bombs are tactical weapons and actually save overall life and create less pollution than the alternatives.) could cut into a lot of cronyistic money-making and fear-mongering.

 MacArthur was a long time hero of mine and I read all I could about him and his excellent administration in Japan as well as the inspiring speech that is summed up as 'I shall return'. I used that phrase frequently for many years.
 In 1980 or thereabouts I went to New Orleans and hired a man who had been George Marshall's top NCO and the Allied chief NCO of commandos in Korea. Thus began my real education and since then I have found much of the stories about MacArthur are really attributable to Marshall or are mere gloss-overs of the truth. Things were not as simple as this man was aware of either. For example the UN was in charge of the Korean operation but a Russian was in charge of its administration.

 There was one story my short-term employee had that made a lot of sense. Apparently Truman had to put a stop to the reporting about it because the American people would have been easily whipped into a frenzy by the fact that the Chinese were taking American POWs and betting on when they would die. They drove bamboo shoots into their bodies and continued until the person was declared dead. The winner was the one who had correctly calculated how many it would take and the betting and wagering continued as people saw their original bet go by the wayside. Yes, I can see how this would have made Americans mad enough to use the Bomb on China and end all the nonsense of the Cold War that makes so much money for the armaments and financial concerns with long term investment horizons.

 But why would MacArthur back down and not pursue his admitted desire for being President? Why did the Kennedy family keep quiet? What is so HUGE that this kind of thing gets stopped in its tracks? Earlier he had covered up the use of bio-weapons used with American POWs by the Japanese according to various credible sources. But I still don't think that would have stopped him. There must be something more to it. Here is a somewhat radical source for the proof stating what Manchester (a very credible source for the paradigm) covered regarding a Nazi criminal that MacArthur worked with at the same time Kissinger came to be part of General Clay and Baruch's re-construction with other Nazi wanted criminals.

 "General Douglas MacArthur -- Another World War II hero, he helped to cover up Japanese war crimes involving chemical and biological experiments on American prisoners so that we could use the secret results. (3) This operation and others directly involved MacArthur's chief of staff, Colonel Charles Willoughby, who is in reality a Nazi criminal, Kurt Weidenbach." (4 & 5)

 So why did MacArthur simply disappear from the world stage? It is the same people and plan that includes the assassination of JFK. JFK was about to stop interest on the US debt as well as end the spy network which is run by the Merovingian Rothschild complex including the IMF and World Bank. There are other issues including the Russell Merovingian drug business that George Bush fronted in China and as CIA executive. There is the issue of Old Joe Kennedy and the mob as well as the image or Spin that the Kennedy Stuart Merovingians needed to maintain despite their children being drug using womanizers or consorts with the highest paid prostitute the world has ever seen, who later married (Please check into Jackie's marriage agreement with Onassis who was part of his family's long term involvement in drug running out of Smyrna.) another Merovingian. There are lots of details in the confusion of Plausible Deniability and patsy types who keep us and our attention mired down in all manner of games. But first on the list of causes for the assassination of JFK, Lincoln and Garfield are the banking interests. In fact the corporate behemoth and involvement of the international financial concerns who own the media has gone unabated and their temerity knows no bounds. But people like Chomsky and McLuhan still don't write it plain and simple - secret societies are the main clearing-house and planning group. They do say it in speeches or in person though. There are two good movies to watch and research which tell a little of the story. One is The International which is like BCCI and Bush had a lot to do with. The other is Margin Call and pay close attention to the speech by Jeremy Irons near the end. Then look up every date (year) to see The Treaty of Westphalia and many more humanity shattering dates.

You will find I am often placing other links and as much information as possible to support what I say. I hope my authentication stands up well against academic me-too think. In truth my sources include the best Nobel Laureates and researchers as well as sources which may seem less reputable. No matter which they should all be questioned as should I be questioned. The next report documents a little about Bushco and BCCI which I first clued into while watching the movie JFK near the end when they comment on Clay Shaw's little phone book. Of course the media hatchet job on Garrison was not corrected when the CIA admitted Shaw was exactly what the New Orleans District Attorney accused him of and which the Dulles deviates refused to release information on, despite it shedding real light on the assassination and their own involvement in it, along with George Bush.

"Two decades ago, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a highly respected financial titan. In 1987, when its subsidiary helped finance a deal involving Texas oilman George W. Bush, the bank appeared to be a reputable institution, with attractive branch offices, a traveler's check business, and a solid reputation for financing international trade. It had high-powered allies in Washington and boasted relationships with respected figures around the world.

All that changed in early 1988, when John Kerry, then a young senator from Massachusetts, decided to probe the finances of Latin American drug cartels. Over the next three years, Kerry fought against intense opposition from vested interests at home and abroad, from senior members of his own party; and from the Reagan and Bush administrations, none of whom were eager to see him succeed.

By the end, Kerry had helped dismantle a massive criminal enterprise and exposed the infrastructure of BCCI and its affiliated institutions, a web that law enforcement officials today acknowledge would become a model for international terrorist financing. As Kerry's investigation revealed in the late 1980s and early 1990s, BCCI was interested in more than just enriching its clients--it had a fundamentally anti-Western mission. Among the stated goals of its Pakistani founder were to "fight the evil influence of the West," and finance Muslim terrorist organizations. In retrospect, Kerry's investigation had uncovered an institution at the fulcrum of America's first great post-Cold War security challenge."

This post was last modified: 09-24-2015, 09:53 PM by Robert Baird.

09-24-2015, 10:02 PM #2
Robert Baird
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282

 This link details the nature of plausible deniability and how easy it was to get people lining up to help or kill JFK. Remember George I was CIA and he was involved in changing the route of the motorcade at a minimum. Somehow the Dulles CIA brothers get a place on the Warren Commission too. Their family plot at Fort Hill cemetery near Auburn, New York is most important to my research on Myles Keogh who is probably my ancestor and who was involved with a Martin (Martinists are above Dragon Royals maybe.).


 There are many authors and many, many witnesses that have agendas galore.


"Now if the first shot that wounded President Kennedy did not go on to penetrate Governor Connally also, and if one accepts the Commission's conclusion that President Kennedy was not shot before frame 210 of the Zapruder film, and Governor Connally was not shot after frame 240, then two shots must have been fired in the time it took the Zapruder camera to run through the 30 frames from 210 to 240. That time, at 18.3 frames per second, is something over a second and a half. But tests prove that Oswald's rifle, having once been fired, cannot be fired again in less than 2.3 seconds --- this being the minimum time needed merely to operate the rifle's bolt action, without aiming or otherwise hesitating or pausing. On the Commission's assumptions as to the timing of the shots, therefore, it was physically impossible for Oswald alone to inflict President Kennedy's first wound and also shoot Governor Connally, unless he did it with a single bullet. He could not possibly have done it by shooting twice. If there were two shots within this time-span, there were two assassins. Hence it was entirely "necessary" to the "essential findings of the Commission" to determine just which shot hit Governor Connally; the Commission should have known that it was, and it is not easy to see how the three dissenters from the one-shot hypothesis could sign the Report."


In William Manchester's first hand account of how things went down in the White House the day after Dallas you see two important things. LBJ sucking up and being a chameleon but making it clear Averill Harriman who had control of the Manchurian Candidate (Shrub) was the key person LBJ wanted to please.

You know already about my many year relationship with Jim Marrs who was there as a reporter for the Dallas paper. I think there were many different agendas lined up but the most important was JFK taking on the CIA and wanting to end the debt by issuing Silver Certificates. The Vatican was very concerned about this but their bankers were more concerned. But the Vatican had lost control of the secret agencies after the Templars fought them alongside the Cathars.

In the Lincoln assassination Surratt was kept safe by the Vatican for seven years - his mother went to jail. Yes, there is much debate about Booth and whether he died as said. Nothing is simple except people who point fingers at just one group or cabal. Our problems start when we BELIEVE - anything at all.

As any accountant knows (I was a public accountant first) a business must balance the books and follow GAAP. But no nation does - the debt grows and we could simply do proper accounting to get the bankers off our backs - why does this not happen? Why is the major landholder in this world exempt from paying even land taxes?
This post was last modified: 09-24-2015, 10:17 PM by Robert Baird.

09-25-2015, 12:18 PM #3
Robert Baird
Status: Offline Posts:914 Likes Received:282
Is this true - page not found?

Many times I have tried to post a Stephen Kinsler article addressing the Dulles Bros around the Warren Commission era including JFK saying he would disband the CIA. In fact this whole thread was not coming up when I searched under my name.
This post was last modified: 09-25-2015, 12:28 PM by Robert Baird.